• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国创伤中心接受血管造影术和栓塞术的成年创伤患者的生存相关因素。

Factors associated with survival in adult trauma patients undergoing angiography with and without embolization across trauma centers in the United States.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Department of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.

出版信息

Emerg Radiol. 2023 Feb;30(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02094-6. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10140-022-02094-6
PMID:36264528
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Interventional angiography is increasingly utilized in trauma management for various injuries. Despite published guidelines by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma on the use of angiography, limited data exist on factors associated with outcomes in angiography procedures. This study examines factors associated with survival to hospital discharge in trauma patients undergoing angiography with or without embolization across US trauma centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study used the National Trauma Data Bank 2017 dataset and included adult trauma patients who underwent conventional angiography with or without embolization. A bivariate analysis was done to compare patients' characteristics by outcome (survived/died), followed by a multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine factors associated with survival to hospital discharge after adjusting for important confounders.

RESULTS

In the included sample of 4242 patients, median age was 41 years and male gender was predominant (72.6%). Overall mean time to angiography was 263.77 ± 750.19 min. Factors positively associated with survival included treatment at large facilities with over 401 beds (OR = 2.170; 95% CI, [1.277-3.685]), helicopter ambulance/fixed-wing transport (OR = 1.736; 95% CI, [1.325-2.275]), mild Glasgow Coma Scale (OR = 7.621; 95% CI, [5.868-9.898]) and moderate Glasgow Coma Scale (OR = 3.127; 95% CI, [2.080-4.701]), SBP ≥ 90 (OR = 1.516; 95% CI [1.199-1.916]), and spleen as embolization site (OR = 1.647; 95% CI [1.119-2.423]).

CONCLUSION

This nationwide study identified variables associated with survival in trauma patients who underwent angiography. These variables can serve in creating standardized risk stratification tools that could be incorporated into evidence-based guidelines for angiography candidates.

摘要

简介

介入血管造影术在各种创伤的治疗中越来越多地被应用。尽管东部创伤外科学会(Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma)发布了关于血管造影术使用的指南,但关于血管造影术相关结果的影响因素的数据有限。本研究在美国创伤中心调查了接受血管造影术(有或无栓塞)的创伤患者与生存至出院相关的因素。

材料和方法

本回顾性观察性研究使用了国家创伤数据库 2017 年数据集,纳入了接受常规血管造影术(有或无栓塞)的成年创伤患者。通过双变量分析比较了不同结局(存活/死亡)患者的特征,然后进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定在调整重要混杂因素后与生存至出院相关的因素。

结果

在纳入的 4242 例患者样本中,中位年龄为 41 岁,男性占主导地位(72.6%)。总体平均血管造影时间为 263.77±750.19 分钟。与生存相关的因素包括在床位超过 401 张的大型医疗机构治疗(OR=2.170;95%CI,[1.277-3.685])、直升机救护车/固定翼运输(OR=1.736;95%CI,[1.325-2.275])、轻度格拉斯哥昏迷量表(OR=7.621;95%CI,[5.868-9.898])和中度格拉斯哥昏迷量表(OR=3.127;95%CI,[2.080-4.701])、收缩压≥90mmHg(OR=1.516;95%CI,[1.199-1.916])和栓塞部位为脾脏(OR=1.647;95%CI,[1.119-2.423])。

结论

这项全国性研究确定了与接受血管造影术的创伤患者生存相关的变量。这些变量可用于创建标准化风险分层工具,纳入血管造影术候选者的循证指南。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with survival in adult trauma patients undergoing angiography with and without embolization across trauma centers in the United States.在美国创伤中心接受血管造影术和栓塞术的成年创伤患者的生存相关因素。
Emerg Radiol. 2023 Feb;30(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02094-6. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
2
Interventional angiography utilization for adult trauma patients in Trauma Centers across the United States: An observational study using the National Trauma Data Bank.美国创伤中心成人创伤患者介入血管造影的利用:一项使用国家创伤数据库的观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 7;101(40):e30900. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030900.
3
Does time to angiography affect the survival of trauma patients with embolization to the pelvis? A retrospective study across trauma centers in the United States.血管造影时间是否影响接受骨盆栓塞治疗的创伤患者的存活率?美国创伤中心的回顾性研究。
Injury. 2023 Dec;54(12):111173. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111173. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
4
Increasing use of endovascular therapy in pediatric arterial trauma.小儿动脉创伤中血管内治疗的使用日益增加。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4):1175-1183.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.072. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
5
Factors Associated with Survival After Emergency Department Thoracotomy for Adult Trauma Patients in the United States.美国成人创伤患者行急诊开胸术后生存相关因素分析。
J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;59(2):169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
6
Risk stratification of survival in injured patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the first hour of arrival to trauma centre: retrospective analysis from the national trauma data bank.创伤中心到达后首小时内接受心肺复苏的受伤患者生存风险分层:来自国家创伤数据库的回顾性分析
Emerg Med J. 2017 May;34(5):282-288. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204306. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Influence of postoperative hepatic angiography on mortality after laparotomy in Grade IV/V hepatic injuries.术后肝动脉造影对 IV/V 级肝损伤剖腹手术后死亡率的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Aug;85(2):290-297. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001906.
8
Splenic Embolization After Trauma: An Opportunity to Improve Best Immunization Practices.创伤后脾栓塞:改善最佳免疫实践的契机。
J Surg Res. 2018 Dec;232:293-297. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.036. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
9
Impact of Trauma Center Designation Level on the Survival of Trauma Patients Transported by Police in the United States.创伤中心指定级别对美国警察转运创伤患者生存率的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 Jul-Aug;26(4):582-589. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1983092. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
10
Association Between Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices for Treatment of Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures and Mortality Rates Among US Trauma Centers.创伤性肋骨骨折患者治疗的循证实践依从性与美国创伤中心死亡率之间的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201316. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1316.