College of Life Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Safety and Health, State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics and Precision Application, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510070, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Safety and Health, State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Institute of Microbiology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiomics and Precision Application, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510070, China.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2023 Jan 2;384:109957. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109957. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
Oysters and mussels are important vectors for norovirus (NoV). An efficient pretreatment method for NoV detection in oysters based on ISO 15216-2:2019 was established in our previous work, but its effectiveness for other types of shellfish remains unknown. Therefore, this study systematically compared the differences between the standard and modified ISO methods in detecting NoV for oysters and mussels. Using the standard ISO method, the recovery rates of NoV in oysters (2.10 ± 0.80 %) and mussels (2.39 ± 0.56 %) were comparable (p > 0.05, unpaired t-test). In contrast, the virus recovery rates in oysters (19.83 ± 3.64 %) and mussels (46.96 ± 3.55 %) were both significantly improved by the modified method. Also, a significant difference was found between the virus recovery rates in two shellfish (p < 0.05, unpaired t-test), resulting in a 2.09-fold difference in their virus concentrations. Additionally, the limits of detection at 95 % probability of the modified ISO method for oysters and mussels could both reach 3.33 × 10 copies/g of digestive glands. Finally, the modified ISO method has been successfully applied in commercial oysters (14/27, 51.85 %) and mussels (15/23, 65.22 %), and the results indicated a significant difference in NoV recovery rates between two shellfish (p < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance). In summary, the modified ISO method showed higher virus recovery rates than the standard ISO method, which would be used as an essential tool for NoV detection in oysters and mussels.
牡蛎和贻贝是诺如病毒(NoV)的重要载体。我们之前的工作建立了一种基于 ISO 15216-2:2019 的牡蛎中诺如病毒检测的高效预处理方法,但它在其他贝类中的有效性尚不清楚。因此,本研究系统比较了标准和改良 ISO 方法在检测牡蛎和贻贝中诺如病毒的差异。使用标准 ISO 方法,牡蛎(2.10±0.80%)和贻贝(2.39±0.56%)中 NoV 的回收率相当(p>0.05,非配对 t 检验)。相比之下,改良方法显著提高了牡蛎(19.83±3.64%)和贻贝(46.96±3.55%)中病毒的回收率。此外,两种贝类中病毒回收率之间存在显著差异(p<0.05,非配对 t 检验),导致病毒浓度差异高达 2.09 倍。此外,改良 ISO 方法在 95%概率下对牡蛎和贻贝的检测限均可达到 3.33×10 拷贝/g 消化腺。最后,改良 ISO 方法已成功应用于商业牡蛎(14/27,51.85%)和贻贝(15/23,65.22%),结果表明两种贝类中 NoV 回收率存在显著差异(p<0.05,单向方差分析)。总之,改良 ISO 方法比标准 ISO 方法具有更高的病毒回收率,将成为牡蛎和贻贝中诺如病毒检测的重要工具。