Buhr Tony L, Borgers-Klonkowski Erica, Gutting Bradford W, Hammer Emlyn E, Hamilton Shelia M, Huhman Brett M, Jackson Stuart L, Kennihan Neil L, Lilly Samuel D, Little John D, Luck Brooke B, Matuczinski Emily A, Miller Charles T, Sides Rachel E, Yates Vanessa L, Young Alice A
Naval Surface Warfare Center-Dahlgren Division, Concepts and Experimentation Branch (B64), Dahlgren, VA, United States.
Naval Research Laboratory (Plasma Physics Division), Washington, DC, United States.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Oct 4;10:875817. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.875817. eCollection 2022.
The dosages and efficacy of 14 ultraviolet (UV) decontamination technologies were measured against a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus that was dried onto different materials for laboratory and field testing. A live enveloped, ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 was dried on stainless steel 304 (SS304), Navy Top Coat-painted SS304 (NTC), cardboard, polyurethane, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) materials at > 8.0 log plaque-forming units (PFU) per test coupon. The coupons were then exposed to UV radiation during both laboratory and field testing. Commercial and prototype UV-emitting devices were measured for efficacy: four handheld devices, three room/surface-disinfecting machines, five air disinfection devices, and two larger custom-made machines. UV device dosages ranged from 0.01 to 729 mJ cm. The antiviral efficacy among the different UV devices ranged from no decontamination up to nearly achieving sterilization. Importantly, cardboard required far greater dosage than SS304. Enormous variability in dosage and efficacy was measured among the different UV devices. Porous materials limit the utility of UV decontamination. UV devices have wide variability in dosages, efficacy, hazards, and UV output over time, indicating that each UV device needs independent technical measurement and assessment for product development prior to and during use.
针对一种干燥在不同材料上的新冠病毒替代病毒,测量了14种紫外线(UV)消毒技术的剂量和效果,用于实验室和现场测试。一种新冠病毒的活包膜核糖核酸(RNA)病毒替代物以每个测试样本>8.0对数菌斑形成单位(PFU)的量干燥在304不锈钢(SS304)、海军面漆涂覆的SS304(NTC)、纸板、聚氨酯、聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)和丙烯腈丁二烯苯乙烯(ABS)材料上。然后在实验室和现场测试期间,将这些样本暴露于紫外线辐射下。对商用和原型紫外线发射设备的效果进行了测量:四台手持式设备、三台房间/表面消毒机、五台空气消毒设备和两台大型定制设备。紫外线设备的剂量范围为0.01至729 mJ/cm²。不同紫外线设备的抗病毒效果范围从无消毒到几乎达到灭菌。重要的是,纸板所需的剂量远高于SS304。不同紫外线设备的剂量和效果存在巨大差异。多孔材料限制了紫外线消毒的效用。紫外线设备在剂量、效果、危害和紫外线输出随时间的变化方面存在很大差异,这表明每个紫外线设备在使用前和使用期间都需要进行独立的技术测量和评估,以用于产品开发。