Sharma Radhika, Dwivedi Laxmi Kant, Jana Somnath, Banerjee Kajori, Mishra Rakesh, Mahapatra Bidhubhusan, Sahu Damodar, Singh S K
International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Department of Survey Research & Data Analytics, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Oct 3;19:101252. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101252. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Implementing a large-scale survey involves a string of intricate procedures exposed to numerous types of survey errors. Uniform and systematic training protocols, comprehensive survey manuals, and multilayer supervision during survey implementation help reduce survey errors, providing a consistent fieldwork environment that should not result in any variation in the quality of data collected across interviewers and teams. With this background, the present study attempts to delineate the effect of field investigator (FI) teams and survey implementation design on the selected outcomes. Data on four of the bigger Empowered Action Group (EAG) states of India, namely Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, and Rajasthan, were obtained from the fourth round of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) for analysis. A fixed-effect binary logistic regression model was used to assess the effect of FI teams and survey implementation design on the selected outcomes. To study the variation in the outcome variables at the interviewer level, a cross-classified multilevel model was used. Since one interviewer had worked in more than one primary sampling unit (PSU) & district and did not follow a perfect hierarchical structure, the cross-classified multilevel model was deemed suitable. In addition, since NFHS-4 used a two-stage stratified sampling design, two-level weights were adjusted for the models to compute unbiased estimates. This study demonstrated the presence of interviewer-level variation in the selected outcomes at both inter- and intra-field agencies across the selected states. The interviewer-level intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for women who had not availed antenatal care (ANC) was the highest for eastern Madhya Pradesh (0.23) and central Uttar Pradesh (0.20). For 'immunisation card not seen', Rajasthan (0.16) and western Uttar Pradesh (0.13) had higher interviewer-level ICC. Interviewer-level variations were insignificant for women who gave birth at home across all regions of Uttar Pradesh. Eastern Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Bihar showed higher interviewer-level variation across the selected outcomes, underlining the critical role of agencies and skilled interviewers in different survey implementation designs. The analysis highlights non-uniform adherence to survey protocols, which implies that not all interviewers and agencies performed in a similar manner in the field. This study recommends a refined mechanism for field implementation and supervision, including focused training on the challenges faced by FIs, random vigilance, and morale building. In addition, examining interviewer-level characteristics, field challenges, and field agency effects may also highlight the roots of interviewer-level variation in the data. However, based on the interviewer's performance in the field, the present study offers an intriguing insight into interviewer-level variations in the quality of data.
开展大规模调查涉及一系列复杂程序,容易出现多种调查误差。统一且系统的培训方案、全面的调查手册以及调查实施过程中的多层监督有助于减少调查误差,营造一个一致的实地调查环境,确保不同访谈员和团队收集的数据质量不会出现差异。在此背景下,本研究试图阐述实地调查员(FI)团队及调查实施设计对所选结果的影响。从第四次全国家庭健康调查(NFHS - 4)中获取了印度四个较大的赋权行动小组(EAG)邦,即北方邦、中央邦、比哈尔邦和拉贾斯坦邦的数据进行分析。使用固定效应二元逻辑回归模型来评估FI团队及调查实施设计对所选结果的影响。为研究访谈员层面结果变量的差异,采用了交叉分类多层模型。由于一名访谈员在多个初级抽样单位(PSU)和地区工作,且未遵循完美的层级结构,所以认为交叉分类多层模型是合适的。此外,由于NFHS - 4采用两阶段分层抽样设计,对模型调整了两级权重以计算无偏估计。本研究表明,在所选邦的不同实地调查机构之间及内部,所选结果在访谈员层面存在差异。在中央邦东部(0.23)和北方邦中部(0.20),未接受产前护理(ANC)的女性的访谈员层面组内相关系数(ICC)最高。对于“未见过免疫接种卡”,拉贾斯坦邦(0.16)和北方邦西部(0.13)的访谈员层面ICC较高。在北方邦所有地区,在家分娩的女性的访谈员层面差异不显著。中央邦东部、拉贾斯坦邦和比哈尔邦在所选结果上显示出较高的访谈员层面差异,凸显了不同调查实施设计中机构和熟练访谈员的关键作用。分析突出了对调查方案的不统一遵守情况,这意味着并非所有访谈员和机构在实地的表现都相似。本研究建议完善实地实施和监督机制,包括针对实地调查员面临的挑战进行重点培训、随机监督和鼓舞士气。此外,研究访谈员层面的特征、实地挑战和实地机构的影响,也可能揭示数据中访谈员层面差异的根源。然而,基于访谈员在实地的表现,本研究对数据质量方面访谈员层面的差异提供了有趣的见解。