National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Apr;38(7-8):5963-5992. doi: 10.1177/08862605221127216. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
This study compared how two different measurement methods of client-perpetrated violence influence findings on prevalence rates and mental health outcomes in a probability sample of 660 Norwegian public sector child welfare workers. Using a single-item self-labeling approach, 15.4% reported exposure to physical violence, and 19.3% reported exposure to threats. Using a 15-item behavioral experience inventory, the prevalence rates ranged from 4.4% to 65.7%. A comparison of these methods uncovered a high number of false negatives when using the single-item approach as 62.2% of those who indicated that they had not experienced any workplace violence when answering the single-item questions reported being exposed 1 to 2 times when responding to the behavioral inventory. Results based on the behavioral inventory further revealed that the most frequently occurring actions in the child welfare service were direct and indirect forms of threats (24.5%-65.7%), while the least reported behaviors were threats and violence including objects (4.4.%-9.1%). Although client-perpetrated violence was significantly associated with mental health problems (e.g., symptoms of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress [PTS]) for both assessment methods, the magnitude of the effect sizes differed from η = .000 to η = .121. These findings highlight that the use of different measurement methods for workplace violence has significant consequences for the assessment of prevalence rates, as well as on results of associated outcomes. Consequently, the decision on how to assess workplace violence has practical implications for uncovering how prominent the issue is, as well as the way in which this negative workplace exposure is subsequently addressed and counteracted. Therefore, both scholars and the child welfare service, and similar fields in which workplace violence frequently occurs, should take these findings into consideration for future assessments.
本研究比较了两种不同的客户暴力测量方法对挪威公共部门 660 名儿童福利工作者概率样本中流行率和心理健康结果的影响。使用单一项目自我标记方法,15.4%的人报告遭受身体暴力,19.3%的人报告遭受威胁。使用 15 项行为体验量表,流行率范围从 4.4%到 65.7%。比较这两种方法发现,使用单一项目方法会产生大量的假阴性,因为在回答单一项目问题时表示没有经历任何工作场所暴力的人中,有 62.2%在回答行为清单时报告了 1 到 2 次暴露。基于行为清单的结果进一步表明,在儿童福利服务中最常发生的行为是直接和间接形式的威胁(24.5%-65.7%),而报告最少的行为是威胁和暴力包括物体(4.4.%-9.1%)。尽管客户暴力与两种评估方法的心理健康问题(如焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激 [PTS] 症状)显著相关,但效应大小的大小从η=0.000 到η=0.121 不等。这些发现强调,使用不同的工作场所暴力测量方法对流行率评估以及相关结果的评估具有重大影响。因此,如何评估工作场所暴力的决定对揭示问题的严重程度以及随后如何处理和应对这种负面工作场所暴露具有实际意义。因此,学者和儿童福利服务以及类似经常发生工作场所暴力的领域都应该考虑这些发现,以便在未来进行评估。