• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单腔双线顶管穿越不同土质材料对地表隆起和沉降影响的模拟分析。

Simulation analysis of the effect of single-chamber double-line pipe jacking through different soil materials on surface uplift and subsidence.

机构信息

School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Shaanxi Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 21;17(10):e0276366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276366. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0276366
PMID:36269728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9586396/
Abstract

This article is based on the relocation project of the 330 kV overhead line in Xi'an, China. In this paper, the soil settlement under different jacking depths was calculated by using the modified Peck's formula. Meanwhile, by modeling in ABAQUS, the jacking process of a single-chamber double-line large diameter pipeline under different soil conditions was simulated, and the ground deformation data under the different simulated working conditions were obtained. The results of the two methods were compared with the construction monitoring results, and it was found that the finite element simulation results were closer to the actual results. The control variable method was used in the analysis of the surface soil deformation law to analyze the effect of different soil parameters and pipe jacking depths on surface soil deformation. Finally, the best soil conditions applicable to single-chamber double-line large diameter pipe jacking construction were obtained through comparative analysis. The results show that (1) when using double-line construction, the maximum surface settlement under different soil conditions is located 11-15 m from the centerline of the soil above the pipeline, the minimum settlement location is inside the isolation pile, and with the increase in jacking distance, the settlement at the same section of the surface will gradually decrease and finally produce a small uplift. (2) In the first jacking, the settlement of powder clay is the largest, and the maximum settlement points in the surface section are more distributed. The maximum settlement value is approximately 11.66 mm. The settlement of powder soil is the smallest but produces a certain uplift deformation, and its maximum settlement is more concentrated in the surface section. After the comparison of deformation and soil parameters, loess-like soil is more suitable for single-compartment double-line large diameter pipe jacking construction. (3) When the top pipe burial depth changes, the greater the burial depth is, the smaller the settlement but the greater the lateral influence range. In the soil parameters, the modulus of elasticity only changes 3 MPa, and the settlement change value is approximately 5 mm. By changing the parameters, it can be obtained that the larger the modulus of elasticity of the soil is, the smaller its deformation. The larger the internal friction angle of the soil is, the smaller its deformation, but the maximum value of settlement change is only 1.7 mm, which means that the change in the internal friction angle has little effect on the soil deformation.

摘要

这篇文章基于中国西安的 330kV 架空线路搬迁项目。本文采用修正后的 Peck 公式计算了不同顶进深度下的土体沉降。同时,通过在 ABAQUS 中建模,模拟了不同土壤条件下单室双线大直径管道的顶进过程,得到了不同模拟工况下的地面变形数据。将两种方法的结果与施工监测结果进行了比较,发现有限元模拟结果更接近实际结果。通过控制变量法分析了地表土变形规律,分析了不同土性参数和顶进深度对地表土变形的影响。最后,通过对比分析,得出了适用于单室双线大直径管顶进施工的最佳土质条件。结果表明:(1)在采用双线施工时,不同土质条件下的最大地表沉降位于管道上方土体中心线 11-15m 处,最小沉降位置位于隔离桩内,随着顶进距离的增加,同一断面的沉降会逐渐减小,最终产生小的隆起。(2)在第一次顶进时,粉质黏土的沉降最大,地表断面的最大沉降点分布较多。最大沉降值约为 11.66mm。粉质土的沉降最小,但产生一定的隆起变形,最大沉降值在地表断面较为集中。通过变形和土性参数的对比,黄土状土更适合单室双线大直径管顶进施工。(3)当上顶管埋深发生变化时,埋深越大,沉降越小,但侧向影响范围越大。在土性参数中,弹性模量仅变化 3MPa,沉降变化值约为 5mm。通过改变参数,可以得出,土的弹性模量越大,其变形越小。土的内摩擦角越大,其变形越小,但沉降变化的最大值仅为 1.7mm,这意味着内摩擦角的变化对土的变形影响较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/a06e1cde7b5c/pone.0276366.g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/ba37a4a1faee/pone.0276366.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/55d8346d436e/pone.0276366.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/b72227b090ea/pone.0276366.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/bdb2bdf231d8/pone.0276366.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/b8e03dc98c64/pone.0276366.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/a017ef896e55/pone.0276366.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/63dd5702c35e/pone.0276366.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/56d2aca8c548/pone.0276366.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/8e12b2ee019c/pone.0276366.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/f4fbfaa4082c/pone.0276366.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/242df65e0afe/pone.0276366.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/6de571a89166/pone.0276366.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/5374a531c453/pone.0276366.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/060e31711f1b/pone.0276366.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/57798804889e/pone.0276366.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/7c98f4edf829/pone.0276366.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/37398e82925a/pone.0276366.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/6222e30a5199/pone.0276366.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/a2b9db52b2c1/pone.0276366.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/948eb5815b5a/pone.0276366.g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/c407d6891c9f/pone.0276366.g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/a06e1cde7b5c/pone.0276366.g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/ba37a4a1faee/pone.0276366.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/55d8346d436e/pone.0276366.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/b72227b090ea/pone.0276366.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/bdb2bdf231d8/pone.0276366.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/b8e03dc98c64/pone.0276366.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/a017ef896e55/pone.0276366.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/63dd5702c35e/pone.0276366.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/56d2aca8c548/pone.0276366.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/8e12b2ee019c/pone.0276366.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/f4fbfaa4082c/pone.0276366.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/242df65e0afe/pone.0276366.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/6de571a89166/pone.0276366.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/5374a531c453/pone.0276366.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/060e31711f1b/pone.0276366.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/57798804889e/pone.0276366.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/7c98f4edf829/pone.0276366.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/37398e82925a/pone.0276366.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/6222e30a5199/pone.0276366.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/a2b9db52b2c1/pone.0276366.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/948eb5815b5a/pone.0276366.g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/c407d6891c9f/pone.0276366.g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5378/9586396/a06e1cde7b5c/pone.0276366.g022.jpg

相似文献

1
Simulation analysis of the effect of single-chamber double-line pipe jacking through different soil materials on surface uplift and subsidence.单腔双线顶管穿越不同土质材料对地表隆起和沉降影响的模拟分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 21;17(10):e0276366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276366. eCollection 2022.
2
Surface settlement law of double-hole pipe-jacking tunnel undercrossing expressway.双孔顶管隧道下穿高速公路地表沉降规律
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 7;13(1):19286. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46364-w.
3
Comparative research on the pipe-soil frictional resistances of circular and rectangular pipe sections during trenchless pipe jacking.非开挖顶管施工中圆形和矩形管段管土摩擦力的对比研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0297537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297537. eCollection 2024.
4
Frictional resistance calculation and jacking force prediction of rectangular pipe jacking.矩形顶管的摩阻力计算与顶力预测
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 11;13(1):14992. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42189-9.
5
Analysis of factors influencing surface settlement during shield construction of a double-line tunnel in a mudstone area.泥岩地区双线隧道盾构施工地表沉降影响因素分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 30;12(1):22606. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27206-7.
6
Prediction method of surface settlement of rectangular pipe jacking tunnel based on improved PSO-BP neural network.基于改进的 PSO-BP 神经网络的矩形顶管隧道地表沉降预测方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 4;13(1):5512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32189-0.
7
Analysis and Prediction of Subway Tunnel Surface Subsidence Based on Internet of Things Monitoring and BP Neural Network.基于物联网监测和 BP 神经网络的地铁隧道地表沉降分析与预测。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 14;2022:9447897. doi: 10.1155/2022/9447897. eCollection 2022.
8
A Novel Detection and Assessment Method for Operational Defects of Pipe Jacking Tunnel Based on 3D Longitudinal Deformation Curve: A Case Study.基于三维纵向变形曲线的顶管隧道运行缺陷新型检测与评估方法:案例研究
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 9;22(19):7648. doi: 10.3390/s22197648.
9
Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors for Pile Jacking Monitoring in Clay Soil.用于黏土中静压桩监测的光纤布拉格光栅传感器
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 14;20(18):5239. doi: 10.3390/s20185239.
10
Field Test of Excess Pore Water Pressure at Pile-Soil Interface Caused by PHC Pipe Pile Penetration Based on Silicon Piezoresistive Sensor.基于硅压阻式传感器的PHC管桩沉桩引起桩土界面超孔隙水压力现场测试
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 16;20(10):2829. doi: 10.3390/s20102829.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative research on the pipe-soil frictional resistances of circular and rectangular pipe sections during trenchless pipe jacking.非开挖顶管施工中圆形和矩形管段管土摩擦力的对比研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0297537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297537. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Apical stress distribution under vertical compaction of gutta-percha and occlusal loads in canals with varying apical sizes: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.不同根尖尺寸根管内牙胶垂直加压与牙合向负载下的根尖应力分布:三维有限元分析。
Int Endod J. 2018 Feb;51(2):233-239. doi: 10.1111/iej.12825. Epub 2017 Aug 21.