School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Shaanxi Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 21;17(10):e0276366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276366. eCollection 2022.
This article is based on the relocation project of the 330 kV overhead line in Xi'an, China. In this paper, the soil settlement under different jacking depths was calculated by using the modified Peck's formula. Meanwhile, by modeling in ABAQUS, the jacking process of a single-chamber double-line large diameter pipeline under different soil conditions was simulated, and the ground deformation data under the different simulated working conditions were obtained. The results of the two methods were compared with the construction monitoring results, and it was found that the finite element simulation results were closer to the actual results. The control variable method was used in the analysis of the surface soil deformation law to analyze the effect of different soil parameters and pipe jacking depths on surface soil deformation. Finally, the best soil conditions applicable to single-chamber double-line large diameter pipe jacking construction were obtained through comparative analysis. The results show that (1) when using double-line construction, the maximum surface settlement under different soil conditions is located 11-15 m from the centerline of the soil above the pipeline, the minimum settlement location is inside the isolation pile, and with the increase in jacking distance, the settlement at the same section of the surface will gradually decrease and finally produce a small uplift. (2) In the first jacking, the settlement of powder clay is the largest, and the maximum settlement points in the surface section are more distributed. The maximum settlement value is approximately 11.66 mm. The settlement of powder soil is the smallest but produces a certain uplift deformation, and its maximum settlement is more concentrated in the surface section. After the comparison of deformation and soil parameters, loess-like soil is more suitable for single-compartment double-line large diameter pipe jacking construction. (3) When the top pipe burial depth changes, the greater the burial depth is, the smaller the settlement but the greater the lateral influence range. In the soil parameters, the modulus of elasticity only changes 3 MPa, and the settlement change value is approximately 5 mm. By changing the parameters, it can be obtained that the larger the modulus of elasticity of the soil is, the smaller its deformation. The larger the internal friction angle of the soil is, the smaller its deformation, but the maximum value of settlement change is only 1.7 mm, which means that the change in the internal friction angle has little effect on the soil deformation.
这篇文章基于中国西安的 330kV 架空线路搬迁项目。本文采用修正后的 Peck 公式计算了不同顶进深度下的土体沉降。同时,通过在 ABAQUS 中建模,模拟了不同土壤条件下单室双线大直径管道的顶进过程,得到了不同模拟工况下的地面变形数据。将两种方法的结果与施工监测结果进行了比较,发现有限元模拟结果更接近实际结果。通过控制变量法分析了地表土变形规律,分析了不同土性参数和顶进深度对地表土变形的影响。最后,通过对比分析,得出了适用于单室双线大直径管顶进施工的最佳土质条件。结果表明:(1)在采用双线施工时,不同土质条件下的最大地表沉降位于管道上方土体中心线 11-15m 处,最小沉降位置位于隔离桩内,随着顶进距离的增加,同一断面的沉降会逐渐减小,最终产生小的隆起。(2)在第一次顶进时,粉质黏土的沉降最大,地表断面的最大沉降点分布较多。最大沉降值约为 11.66mm。粉质土的沉降最小,但产生一定的隆起变形,最大沉降值在地表断面较为集中。通过变形和土性参数的对比,黄土状土更适合单室双线大直径管顶进施工。(3)当上顶管埋深发生变化时,埋深越大,沉降越小,但侧向影响范围越大。在土性参数中,弹性模量仅变化 3MPa,沉降变化值约为 5mm。通过改变参数,可以得出,土的弹性模量越大,其变形越小。土的内摩擦角越大,其变形越小,但沉降变化的最大值仅为 1.7mm,这意味着内摩擦角的变化对土的变形影响较小。