Suppr超能文献

安慰剂在胃轻瘫中的反应和不良事件发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Response and Adverse Event Rates With Placebo in Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Graduate Research Education Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Dipartimento Universitario di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun;21(6):1447-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.09.033. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Multiple drugs have been used to treat gastroparesis symptoms, yet their therapeutic benefits are poorly understood partly due to lack of insight into response and adverse event rates with placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We evaluated these issues systematically in drug trials for gastroparesis.

METHODS

We searched the medical literature through August 2, 2022 to identify RCTs comparing active drug with placebo in patients with gastroparesis. We assessed placebo response rates according to at least one of the following endpoints: improvement according to a composite outcome, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bloating, or fullness, as well as total adverse events, and adverse events leading to withdrawal. We extracted data as intention-to-treat analyses with dropouts assumed to be treatment failures. We pooled placebo response and adverse event rates using a random effects model and expressed as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were eligible. Among 23 trials reporting a composite endpoint of improvement, the pooled placebo response rate was 29.3% (95% CI, 23.7%-35.2%). Pooled placebo response rates were higher in idiopathic compared with diabetic gastroparesis (34.2% vs 28.1%), among trials that did not use validated symptom questionnaires (31.2% vs 27.4%), and in RCTs of shorter duration (<4 weeks, 32.6% vs ≥9 weeks, 23.2%). Adverse events occurred in 33.8% (95% CI, 26.4%-41.8%) of patients with placebo, in 27 trials, and were less common in idiopathic compared with diabetic gastroparesis (17.9% vs 43.4%), trials of shorter duration (<4 weeks, 33.7% vs ≥9 weeks, 40.7%), and trials with lower randomization ratios of active drug to placebo (1:1, 26.7% vs 3:1, 50.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis assessed placebo response and adverse event rates in gastroparesis. To accurately assess therapeutic gain, future trials should be a minimum of 8 weeks duration, use validated questionnaires, and distinguish gastroparesis subtypes.

摘要

背景与目的

已有多种药物被用于治疗胃轻瘫症状,但由于缺乏对随机对照试验(RCT)中安慰剂反应和不良事件发生率的了解,其治疗效果仍不清楚。我们系统地评估了这些药物治疗胃轻瘫的临床试验中的问题。

方法

我们通过 2022 年 8 月 2 日检索医学文献,以确定比较胃轻瘫患者活性药物与安慰剂的 RCT。我们根据以下至少一个终点评估安慰剂反应率:根据综合结果、恶心、呕吐、腹痛、腹胀或饱胀、以及总不良事件和导致停药的不良事件改善。我们采用意向治疗分析提取数据,假定脱落为治疗失败。我们使用随机效应模型汇总安慰剂反应和不良事件发生率,并以 95%置信区间(CI)表示比例。

结果

有 35 项研究符合条件。在 23 项报告改善综合终点的试验中,安慰剂反应率为 29.3%(95%CI,23.7%-35.2%)。与糖尿病性胃轻瘫相比,特发性胃轻瘫的安慰剂反应率更高(34.2%比 28.1%);与未使用经验证的症状问卷的试验相比,安慰剂反应率更高(31.2%比 27.4%);与持续时间较短(<4 周,32.6%比≥9 周,23.2%)的 RCT 相比,安慰剂反应率更高。在接受安慰剂的 33.8%(95%CI,26.4%-41.8%)患者中发生了 33.8%(95%CI,26.4%-41.8%)的不良事件,在 27 项试验中发生了不良事件,且与糖尿病性胃轻瘫相比,特发性胃轻瘫较少发生(17.9%比 43.4%)、持续时间较短(<4 周,33.7%比≥9 周,40.7%)和活性药物与安慰剂的随机化比例较低(1:1,26.7%比 3:1,50.5%)。

结论

本荟萃分析评估了胃轻瘫中安慰剂的反应率和不良事件发生率。为了准确评估治疗效果,未来的试验应至少持续 8 周,使用经验证的问卷,并区分胃轻瘫亚型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验