Department of Internal Medicine, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2022 Jan-Mar;20(77):93-96.
Background Diagnostic evaluation of pleural fluid according to Light's criteria to differentiate between exudative and transudative fluid takes 1 or 2 working days. For rapid clinical management, especially in critically ill patients, a simpler bedside diagnostic test can be done which has similar diagnostic accuracy as that of Light's Criteria. Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Drop Hydrogen Peroxide test to differentiate exudative and transudative pleural effusion in comparison to Light's criteria. Method A concurrent validity test was performed using a convenient sampling technique including patients presenting to the Department of Internal Medicine from January to September 2021, who had pleural effusion. Two milliliters of tapped pleural fluid of patients who underwent aseptic thoracocentesis was collected in a test tube to which one to two drops of 20% hydrogen peroxide was added. Presence of bubbles suggested an exudative type of fluid. Rest of the tapped pleural fluid was sent to the laboratory for further evaluation by Light's criteria, which was compared with the results by Drop Hydrogen Peroxide Test. Result There were 83 patients who had pleural effusion, of them a total of 43 patients had transudative pleural effusion while 40 patients had exudative pleural effusion based on Light's criteria and 37 patients had transudative pleural effusion while 46 patients had exudative pleural effusion based on drop hydrogen peroxide test. Conclusion The drop hydrogen peroxide test allows cost effective and prompt evaluation of the type of pleural effusion is exudative or transudative, thereby making it a convenient diagnostic bedside test.
背景 根据 Light 标准对胸腔积液进行诊断评估,以区分渗出液和漏出液,需要 1 到 2 个工作日。为了快速进行临床管理,特别是在危重症患者中,可以进行更简单的床边诊断测试,其诊断准确性与 Light 标准相当。目的 确定滴双氧水试验鉴别渗出性和漏出性胸腔积液的诊断准确性与 Light 标准相比。方法 采用便利抽样技术进行了一项同期有效性测试,包括 2021 年 1 月至 9 月期间在内科就诊的胸腔积液患者。无菌胸腔穿刺术抽取的 2 毫升患者胸腔积液收集在一个试管中,向其中加入 1 到 2 滴 20%的双氧水。如果出现气泡,则提示为渗出性液体。其余的胸腔积液被送到实验室进行进一步的 Light 标准评估,并与滴双氧水试验的结果进行比较。结果 共有 83 名患者出现胸腔积液,其中根据 Light 标准,共有 43 名患者为漏出性胸腔积液,40 名患者为渗出性胸腔积液;根据滴双氧水试验,共有 37 名患者为漏出性胸腔积液,46 名患者为渗出性胸腔积液。结论 滴双氧水试验可经济有效地评估胸腔积液的类型是渗出性还是漏出性,因此是一种方便的床边诊断测试。