Yamamoto Mayu, Kurino Taiki, Matsuda Reiko, Jones Haleigh Sakura, Nakamura Yoshito, Kanamori Taisei, Tsuji Atushi B, Sugyo Aya, Tsuda Ryota, Matsumoto Yui, Sakurai Yu, Suzuki Hiroyuki, Sano Makoto, Osada Kensuke, Uehara Tomoya, Ishii Yukimoto, Akita Hidetaka, Arano Yasushi, Hisaka Akihiro, Hatakeyama Hiroto
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8675, Japan; Laboratory of DDS Design and Drug Disposition, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8675, Japan.
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8675, Japan.
J Control Release. 2022 Dec;352:328-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.10.032. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
Chemotherapy for peritoneal dissemination is poorly effective owing to limited drug transfer from the blood to the intraperitoneal (i.p.) compartment after intravenous (i.v.) administration. i.p. chemotherapy has been investigated to improve drug delivery to tumors; however, the efficacy continues to be debated. As anticancer drugs have low molecular weight and are rapidly excreted through the peritoneal blood vessels, maintaining the i.p. concentration as high as expected is a challenge. In this study, we examined whether i.p. administration is an efficient route of administration of high-molecular-weight immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of peritoneal dissemination using a model of peritoneal disseminated carcinoma. After i.p. administration, the amount of anti-PD-L1 antibody transferred into i.p. tumors increased by approximately eight folds compared to that after i.v. administration. Intratumoral distribution analysis revealed that anti-PD-L1 antibodies were delivered directly from the i.p. space to the surface of tumor tissue, and that they deeply penetrated the tumor tissues after i.p. administration; in contrast, after i.v. administration, anti-PD-L1 antibodies were only distributed around blood vessels in tumor tissues via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Owing to the enhanced delivery, the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-L1 antibody in the peritoneal dissemination models was also improved after i.p. administration compared to that after i.v. administration. This is the first study to clearly demonstrate an EPR-independent delivery of ICIs to i.p. tumors by which ICIs were delivered in a massive amount to the tumor tissue via direct penetration after i.p. administration.
由于静脉给药后药物从血液向腹腔内转移有限,化疗对腹膜播散的疗效不佳。腹腔内化疗已被研究用于改善药物向肿瘤的递送;然而,其疗效仍存在争议。由于抗癌药物分子量低且通过腹膜血管迅速排泄,将腹腔内浓度维持在预期的高水平是一项挑战。在本研究中,我们使用腹膜播散癌模型研究腹腔内给药是否是一种有效的给药途径,用于治疗腹膜播散的高分子量免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)。腹腔内给药后,转移到腹腔内肿瘤中的抗PD-L1抗体量比静脉给药后增加了约八倍。瘤内分布分析显示,抗PD-L1抗体直接从腹腔空间递送至肿瘤组织表面,并且在腹腔内给药后它们深入渗透到肿瘤组织中;相比之下,静脉给药后,抗PD-L1抗体仅通过增强的通透性和滞留(EPR)效应分布在肿瘤组织的血管周围。由于递送增强,与静脉给药后相比,腹腔内给药后抗PD-L1抗体在腹膜播散模型中的治疗效果也得到了改善。这是第一项明确证明ICIs通过腹腔内给药后直接渗透将大量ICIs递送至腹腔内肿瘤的EPR非依赖性递送的研究。