[Study on diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation and related factors based on dynamic electromyography].

OBJECTIVE

To analyze dynamic electromyography characteristics and related factors of lumbar back muscle activity in patients with lumbar disc herniation, and to clarify the clinical significance of dynamic electromyography in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation(LDH).

METHODS

From September 2014 to March 2021, 40 patients with lumbar disc herniation(LDH group) were detected by surface electromyography telemeter. There were 14 males and 26 females, aged from 20 to 61 years old, with an average of(40.68±10.56) years old, the course of illness was from 1 to 120 months, with an average of (17.75±27.56) months. In addition, 12 normal people were recruited as the control group. There were 2 males and 10 females. The age ranged from 24 to 53 years old, with an average of(36.50±10.30) years old. All subjects were subjected to dynamic electromyographic tests of the subthoracic erector spinae, lumbar erector spinae, and multifidus muscles during static standing and trunk flexion and extension. Compare the EMG activity data (average EMG amplitude, median frequency, original EMG graph) of the tested muscles between patients with lumbar disc herniation and normal people, and analyze the correlation between the general data of patients with lumbar disc herniation and the tested muscle EMG data.

RESULTS

When standing still, the average electromyographic amplitude of the erector spinal muscle of the right and left thoracic segments of the subjects in the LDH group increased compared with the control group, and the difference was significant(<0.05). In the trunk flexion and extension, the average electromyographic amplitude of the right and left proximal thoracic erector spinae, the right left lumbar erector spinae, and the right left multifidus muscle of the subjects in the LDH group are all larger than the control group, and the difference was significant(<0.05). In the trunk flexion and extension, the median frequencies of the right left proximal thoracic erector spinae、the right left lumbar erector spinae, and the right left multifidus muscle of the subjects in the LDH group were all larger than the normal control group, and the difference was significant (<0.05). During trunk flexion and extension, the original electromyographic patterns of subjects in the LDH group were significantly different from those in the control group. During the maintenance of the maximum trunk flexion of the subjects in the LDH group, there was a high level of electromyographic activity of the lower back muscles, and the electromyographic static signals that should appear regularly in the original signal could not be distinguished. When the trunk was flexed and extended, had gender, age, weight and height of subjects in the LDH group were not significantly correlated with the average EMG amplitude and median frequency of bilateral proximal thoracic, lumbar erector spinae and bilateral multifidus muscles respectively(>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with lumbar disc herniation have characteristic surface EMG changes in the back muscles that are different from those of normal people. These features can more objectively reflect the patient's muscle condition and can be an effective indicator for the diagnosis and treatment effect evaluation of patients with lumbar disc herniation. It can be seen that surface electromyography is not only a detection method, it can be considered in the routine diagnosis and treatment plan of LDH to guide clinical work.