Ono Yoshihiro, Inoue Yosuke, Ito Hiromichi, Sasaki Takashi, Takeda Tsuyoshi, Ozaka Masato, Sasahira Naoki, Hiratsuka Makiko, Matsueda Kiyoshi, Oba Atsushi, Sato Takafumi, Saiura Akio, Takahashi Yu
Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
HPB (Oxford). 2023 Jan;25(1):100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.09.012. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely used to treat borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the serum carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 response, in association with survival, after four cycles of NAC-gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel.
From 2015 to 2018, patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were treated with NAC. Patients were stratified into two groups after excluding CA19-9 non-secretor: Group L (CA19-9 ≥2 and ≤500 U/mL) and Group H (CA19-9 >500 U/mL). The CA19-9 decrease during NAC was evaluated as a response of NAC and was assessed in association with survival concomitant with other prognosis factors.
Eighty-seven patients were evaluated (Group L: n = 43, Group H: n = 44). In intention-to-treat-based analysis, Group L exhibited significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) than Group H (median PFS: 24 vs 14months). In resection cohort, no correlation was detected between the CA19-9 decrease and survival in Group L. In Group H, the CA19-9 decrease ≤80% was associated with unfavorable survival in multivariate analysis [Hazard ratio: 4.738 (P = 0.007)].
In patients with pre-treatment CA19-9 >500 U/mL, the CA19-9 decrease ≤80% was strongly associated with poor survival and new strategy should be reconsidered for these patients.
新辅助化疗(NAC)被广泛用于治疗可切除边缘性胰腺癌。本研究旨在评估吉西他滨联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇进行四个周期新辅助化疗后血清糖类抗原(CA)19-9反应及其与生存的关系。
2015年至2018年,对可切除边缘性胰腺癌患者进行新辅助化疗。排除CA19-9非分泌者后,患者被分为两组:L组(CA19-9≥2且≤500 U/mL)和H组(CA19-9>500 U/mL)。新辅助化疗期间CA19-9的下降被评估为新辅助化疗的反应,并与生存及其他预后因素相关联进行评估。
共评估了87例患者(L组:n = 43,H组:n = 44)。在意向性分析中,L组的无进展生存期(PFS)显著优于H组(中位PFS:24个月对14个月)。在切除队列中,L组CA19-9的下降与生存无相关性。在H组中,多因素分析显示CA19-9下降≤80%与不良生存相关[风险比:4.738(P = 0.007)]。
对于治疗前CA19-9>500 U/mL的患者,CA19-9下降≤80%与不良生存密切相关,应重新考虑针对这些患者的新策略。