• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可切除胰腺癌患者对一线新辅助FOLFIRINOX方案及二线吉西他滨/纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇的CA19-9反应

CA19-9 Response to First-Line Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and Second-Line Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Operable Pancreatic Cancer.

作者信息

Thalji Sam Z, Kamgar Mandana, George Ben, Aldakkak Mohammed, Christians Kathleen K, Clarke Callisia N, Erickson Beth A, Hall William A, Tolat Parag P, Smith Zachary L, Evans Douglas B, Tsai Susan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, LaBahn Pancreatic Cancer Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, LaBahn Pancreatic Cancer Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):3013-3021. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13055-1. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-022-13055-1
PMID:36788189
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Response to second-line (2L) neoadjuvant therapy for operable pancreatic cancer (PC) is understudied. This study examined carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response to first-line (1L) and 2L chemotherapy.

METHODS

The study identified patients with operable PC and elevated CA19-9 (≥ 35 U/mL with total bilirubin < 2 mg/dL) who received 1L FOLFIRINOX (FFX). The patients were restaged after 2 months and based on response, received additional FFX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) as part of total neoadjuvant therapy. Response was defined as a decrease in tumor size on computed tomography (CT) imaging or a decline in CA19-9 of 50% or more and preserved performance status.

RESULTS

For operable PC with an elevated CA19-9, 108 patients received 1L FFX. After 2 months of chemotherapy, the decision was made to continue FFX (FFX ≥ FFX) for 76 (70%) of the 108 patients and switch to GnP (FFX ≥ GnP)) for 32 (30%) of the patients. Of the 32 FFX ≥ GnP patients, 27 had no evidence of radiographic or biochemical (CA19-9) response to 1L FFX. Of these 27 patients, 26 (96%) demonstrated a response to 2L GnP. After 4 months of chemotherapy, 62 (82%) of the 76 FFX ≥ FFX patients had a CA19-9 response compared with 31 (97%) of the 32 FFX ≥ GnP patients (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of biochemical response to 2 months of 1L FFX may identify a subgroup of patients with a very high rate of response to 2L GnP, emphasizing the importance of assessing treatment response at 2-month intervals.

摘要

背景

可切除胰腺癌(PC)二线(2L)新辅助治疗的反应研究不足。本研究检测了碳水化合物抗原19-9(CA19-9)对一线(1L)和2L化疗的反应。

方法

该研究纳入了可切除PC且CA19-9升高(≥35 U/mL且总胆红素<2 mg/dL)并接受1L FOLFIRINOX(FFX)治疗的患者。2个月后对患者进行重新分期,并根据反应情况,接受额外的FFX或吉西他滨/纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇(GnP)作为总新辅助治疗的一部分。反应定义为计算机断层扫描(CT)成像显示肿瘤大小减小或CA19-9下降50%或更多且保持体能状态。

结果

对于CA19-9升高的可切除PC患者,108例接受了1L FFX治疗。化疗2个月后,108例患者中有76例(70%)决定继续使用FFX(FFX≥FFX组),32例(30%)患者改用GnP(FFX≥GnP组)。在32例FFX≥GnP组患者中,27例对1L FFX无影像学或生化(CA19-9)反应证据。在这27例患者中,26例(96%)对2L GnP有反应。化疗4个月后,76例FFX≥FFX组患者中有62例(82%)CA19-9有反应,而32例FFX≥GnP组患者中有31例(97%)有反应(p = 0.04)。

结论

对1L FFX治疗2个月缺乏生化反应可能识别出一组对2L GnP反应率非常高的患者亚组,强调了每2个月评估治疗反应的重要性。

相似文献

1
CA19-9 Response to First-Line Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and Second-Line Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Operable Pancreatic Cancer.可切除胰腺癌患者对一线新辅助FOLFIRINOX方案及二线吉西他滨/纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇的CA19-9反应
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):3013-3021. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13055-1. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Comparison between FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel including sequential treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matching approach.FOLFIRINOX 与吉西他滨加 nab-紫杉醇(含序贯治疗)治疗转移性胰腺癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 11;21(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08277-7.
3
Real-world outcomes of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer: A population-based propensity score-weighted analysis.真实世界中 FOLFIRINOX 对比吉西他滨和白蛋白紫杉醇在晚期胰腺癌中的疗效:基于人群的倾向评分加权分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(1):160-169. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2705. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
4
Comparison of FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel for Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Using Korean Pancreatic Cancer (K-PaC) Registry.比较 FOLFIRINOX 和吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌:使用韩国胰腺癌(K-PaC)登记处。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;43(9):654-659. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000730.
5
Comparative Effectiveness of nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Nationwide Chart Review in the United States.白蛋白紫杉醇联合吉西他滨与 FOLFIRINOX 方案治疗转移性胰腺癌的疗效比较:美国全国回顾性图表审查。
Adv Ther. 2018 Oct;35(10):1564-1577. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0784-z. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
Clinical outcomes of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer in the real world setting.真实世界环境下 FOLFIRINOX 和吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗转移性胰腺癌的临床结局。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Apr;23(4):812-819. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02473-w. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
7
Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Observational Study (NAPOLEON Study).吉西他滨联合 Nab-紫杉醇对比 FOLFIRINOX 方案治疗局部进展期不可切除胰腺癌的多中心观察性研究(NAPOLEON 研究)。
Pancreas. 2021 Aug 1;50(7):957-964. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001859.
8
FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as the first-line chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer.FOLFIRINOX 对比吉西他滨联合 nab-紫杉醇作为转移性胰腺癌的一线化疗方案。
J Chemother. 2022 Nov;34(7):465-471. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2022.2026125. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
9
Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis.吉西他滨联合 Nab-紫杉醇作为不可切除胰腺癌患者 FOLFIRINOX 二线化疗:单机构回顾性分析。
Chemotherapy. 2021;66(3):58-64. doi: 10.1159/000517244. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. FOLFIRINOX for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇对比 FOLFIRINOX 方案用于晚期胰腺癌患者。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;82(2):245-250. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3611-y. Epub 2018 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic and monitoring potential of circulating tumor DNA in resectable pancreatic cancer.可切除胰腺癌中循环肿瘤DNA的预后及监测潜力
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun 26;10:37. doi: 10.21037/tgh-24-167. eCollection 2025.
2
Molecular Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Prognostication of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.用于胰腺导管腺癌诊断和预后评估的分子生物标志物
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 5;15(6):236. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060236.
3
Anatomical Classification and Staging Systems of Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer-A Subgroup Analysis of the NORPACT-2 Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Switch in Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.局部进展期/交界可切除胰腺癌的新辅助化疗转换。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;29(3):1579-1591. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10991-2. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Total neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus neoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant gemcitabine for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-2 trial): study protocol for a nationwide multicenter randomized controlled trial.总新辅助 FOLFIRINOX 对比新辅助吉西他滨为基础的放化疗和辅助吉西他滨治疗可切除和交界可切除胰腺癌(PREOPANC-2 试验):一项全国多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 23;21(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08031-z.
3
可切除边缘性和局部进展期胰腺癌的解剖学分类与分期系统——NORPACT-2试验的亚组分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17527-y.
4
Chemotherapy switch for localized pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.局部胰腺癌的化疗转换:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;111(10). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae244.
5
Patient-derived Organoid Pharmacotyping As A Predictive Tool for Therapeutic Selection in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.患者来源的类器官药物分型作为胰腺导管腺癌治疗选择的预测工具
Ann Surg. 2024 Sep 4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006517.
6
Using a CA19-9 Tumor Marker Gene Test to Assess Outcome After Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.使用 CA19-9 肿瘤标志物基因检测评估胰腺癌手术后的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 May;31(5):2902-2912. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14942-5. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes in consecutive patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter prospective cohort.
连续局部进展期胰腺癌患者的治疗策略和临床结局:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;47(3 Pt B):699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.137. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
4
Surgical Outcome Results From SWOG S1505: A Randomized Clinical Trial of mFOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel for Perioperative Treatment of Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.SWOG S1505 研究的手术结果:吉西他滨/白蛋白紫杉醇对比改良 FOLFIRINOX 用于可切除胰腺导管腺癌围手术期治疗的随机临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):481-486. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004155.
5
Response and Survival Associated With First-line FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy for Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.一线 FOLFIRINOX 方案与吉西他滨联合 nab-紫杉醇化疗治疗局限性胰腺导管腺癌的反应和生存情况。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Sep 1;155(9):832-839. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2286.
6
CA19-9 Change During Neoadjuvant Therapy May Guide the Need for Additional Adjuvant Therapy Following Resected Pancreatic Cancer.CA19-9 水平在新辅助治疗期间的变化可能指导接受手术治疗后的胰腺癌患者是否需要辅助治疗。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(10):3950-3960. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08468-9. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
7
Purity Independent Subtyping of Tumors (PurIST), A Clinically Robust, Single-sample Classifier for Tumor Subtyping in Pancreatic Cancer.肿瘤纯度独立分型(PurIST):一种用于胰腺癌肿瘤分型的临床稳健的单样本分类器。
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):82-92. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1467. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Goals of Treatment Sequencing for Localized Pancreatic Cancer.局部胰腺癌治疗顺序的目标。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):3815-3819. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07738-5. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
9
Outcomes of Primary Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.原发性化疗治疗交界可切除和局部进展期胰腺导管腺癌的结果。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Oct 1;154(10):932-942. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2277.
10
Survival Outcomes Associated With Clinical and Pathological Response Following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.新辅助 FOLFIRINOX 或吉西他滨/白蛋白紫杉醇化疗后切除的胰腺癌的临床和病理反应与生存结局的相关性。
Ann Surg. 2019 Sep;270(3):400-413. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003468.