National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
West Yorkshire & Harrogate Health and Care Partnership, Bradford, UK.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2022 Oct 25;32(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00305-8.
Currently the National Asthma and COPD audit programme (NACAP) only undertakes audit of COPD primary care in Wales due to its near complete data coverage. We aimed to determine if the quality of COPD primary care in the other UK nations is comparable with Wales. We found that English, Scottish, and Northern Irish practices were significantly worse than Welsh practices at recording coded lung function parameters used in COPD diagnosis (ORs: 0.51 [0.43-0.59], 0.29 [0.23-0.36], 0.42 [0.31-0.58], respectively) and referring appropriate patients for pulmonary rehabilitation (ORs: 0.10 [0.09-0.11], 0.12 [0.11-0.14], 0.22 [0.19-0.25], respectively). Completing national audits of primary care in Wales only may have led to improvements in care, or at least improvements in the recording of care in Wales that are not occurring elsewhere in the UK. This highlights the potential importance of audit in improving care quality and accurate recording of that care.
目前,由于其近乎完整的数据覆盖范围,国家哮喘和 COPD 审计计划(NACAP)仅在威尔士开展 COPD 初级保健审计。我们旨在确定英国其他国家的 COPD 初级保健质量是否与威尔士相当。我们发现,与威尔士相比,英格兰、苏格兰和北爱尔兰的实践在记录 COPD 诊断中使用的编码肺功能参数方面明显较差(ORs:0.51 [0.43-0.59]、0.29 [0.23-0.36]、0.42 [0.31-0.58]),并且为适当的患者转介进行肺康复(ORs:0.10 [0.09-0.11]、0.12 [0.11-0.14]、0.22 [0.19-0.25])。仅在威尔士开展初级保健的全国性审计可能已经导致了护理质量的提高,或者至少在威尔士记录护理方面的改进并没有在英国其他地方发生。这凸显了审计在提高护理质量和准确记录护理方面的潜在重要性。