Suppr超能文献

创伤中心建立对钝性脾外伤治疗的影响:创伤中心建立前后时期的比较。

Impact of the establishment of a trauma center on blunt traumatic spleen injury treatment: Comparison between pre-traumatic center and trauma center periods.

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju-South Korea.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Nov;28(11):1570-1582. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.03262.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The spleen is a commonly injured intra-abdominal organ from blunt trauma. In cases of traumatic blunt spleen injury, immediate treatment is often required. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of the establishment of a trauma center on the treatment of patients with blunt trauma injury to the spleen.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 235 patients who visited our center from 2012 to 2019 for blunt trauma injury to the spleen. The study period was divided into two groups: January 2012 to September 2015 was the pre-center period (PCP), and September 2015 to December 2019 was the trauma center period (TCP). In each period, there were three treatment groups: Surgical group, embolization group, and conservative treatment group. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were patient characteristics, such as injury severity score and abbreviated injury scale score, time from admission to intervention (both surgery and angiography embolization), and rate of spleen-preserving surgery.

RESULTS

In the conservative treatment group, the Hb and hct values were relatively low in the TCP than in the PCP (p=0.007, p=0.008, respectively). The intensive care unit admission rate was relatively high in the TCP (72.9% vs. 90.6%, p=0.031). The ISS was relatively low in the TCP (18 vs. 17, p=0.001). In the surgical group, the time taken to transfer patients to the operating room after admission was greatly reduced in the TCP (151 min vs. 107 min, p=0.028). In the embolization group, the patient's age and SBP were lower in the PCP than in the TCP (p=0.003, p=0.049, respectively); three patients had undergone embolization with CPR in the PCP, and no patient underwent CPR in the TCP. There were three deaths in PCP and none in the TCP (p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

The establishment of a trauma center has led to improvements in the treatment quality and prognosis of patients with blunt trauma injury to the spleen receiving either of the three treatments.

摘要

背景

脾脏是钝性腹部创伤中常见的受伤内脏器官。在创伤性钝性脾损伤的情况下,通常需要立即进行治疗。本研究旨在探讨创伤中心的建立对创伤性钝性脾损伤患者治疗的预后影响。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2012 年至 2019 年间因钝性创伤致脾损伤而到我院就诊的 235 例患者。研究期间分为两组:2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 9 月为中心前时期(PCP),2015 年 9 月至 2019 年 12 月为创伤中心时期(TCP)。在每个时期,都有三个治疗组:手术组、栓塞组和保守治疗组。主要结局是死亡率,次要结局是患者特征,如损伤严重程度评分和简明损伤评分,从入院到干预(手术和血管造影栓塞)的时间,以及保脾手术的比例。

结果

在保守治疗组中,TCP 组的 Hb 和 hct 值相对较低(p=0.007,p=0.008)。TCP 组 ICU 入院率较高(72.9% vs. 90.6%,p=0.031)。TCP 组的 ISS 较低(18 vs. 17,p=0.001)。在手术组中,TCP 组患者入院后转至手术室的时间大大缩短(151 分钟 vs. 107 分钟,p=0.028)。在栓塞组中,TCP 组患者的年龄和 SBP 较 PCP 组低(p=0.003,p=0.049);PCP 组中有 3 例患者进行了 CPR 栓塞,而 TCP 组中没有。PCP 组有 3 例死亡,而 TCP 组无死亡(p=0.05)。

结论

创伤中心的建立改善了接受三种治疗方法之一的创伤性钝性脾损伤患者的治疗质量和预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcde/10277344/f44c858ae5b4/TJTES-28-1570-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验