• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Hospital Participation in Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced With Medicare Spending and Hospital Incentive Payments.医院参与改善医疗保险支付的捆绑支付与医疗支出和医院激励支付的关联。
JAMA. 2022 Oct 25;328(16):1616-1623. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18529.
2
Factors Associated With Participation in Cardiac Episode Payments Included in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative.与参与医疗保险捆绑支付改善计划中的心脏事件支付相关的因素。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;3(8):761-766. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1736.
3
Association of Hospital Participation in a Medicare Bundled Payment Program With Volume and Case Mix of Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Episodes.医院参与 Medicare 打包支付计划与下肢关节置换术例数和病例组合的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 4;320(9):901-910. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12345.
4
Spending and quality after three years of Medicare's bundled payments for medical conditions: quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study.医保捆绑付费政策实施三年后对医疗状况的支出和质量的影响:准实验双重差分研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 17;369:m1780. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1780.
5
Performance of Physician Groups and Hospitals Participating in Bundled Payments Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中参与打包支付的医师团队和医院的绩效。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Dec 2;3(12):e224889. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4889.
6
Post-Acute Care After Joint Replacement in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative.医疗保险捆绑支付改善计划中关节置换术后的康复护理。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):1027-1035. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15803. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
7
Target Prices Influence Hospital Participation And Shared Savings In Medicare Bundled Payment Program.目标价格影响医院参与医疗保险捆绑支付计划的情况及共享节约额。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Sep;39(9):1479-1485. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00104.
8
Association of Bundled Payments for Joint Replacement Surgery and Patient Outcomes With Simultaneous Hospital Participation in Accountable Care Organizations.关节置换手术捆绑支付与患者结局与同时参与责任医疗组织的医院之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1912270. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12270.
9
Association Between Hospital Participation in a Medicare Bundled Payment Initiative and Payments and Quality Outcomes for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Episodes.医院参与医疗保险捆绑支付计划与下肢关节置换事件的支付及质量结果之间的关联。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1267-78. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12717.
10
How Do Frail Medicare Beneficiaries Fare Under Bundled Payments?衰弱的 Medicare 受益人在捆绑支付下表现如何?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Nov;67(11):2245-2253. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16147. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Hospitals Participating in the Transforming Episode Accountability Model.参与转型事件问责制模式的医院的特征
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251996. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1996.
2
A Qualitative Study of Unplanned Hospital Readmissions: Patient Perspectives on Their Hospital to Home Transition.一项关于非计划再次入院的定性研究:患者对从医院到家庭过渡的看法。
Nurs Rep. 2025 May 29;15(6):192. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060192.
3
Value-based Reimbursement as a Mechanism to Achieve Social and Financial Impact in the Healthcare System.基于价值的报销作为在医疗保健系统中实现社会和财务影响的一种机制。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2023 Oct 31;10(2):100-103. doi: 10.36469/001c.89151. eCollection 2023.
4
Value-Based Payment for Cardiovascular Care: Getting to the Heart of the Matter.心血管护理的价值导向型支付:抓住问题的核心
Circulation. 2023 Oct 3;148(14):1084-1086. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065661. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
5
Reconciliation Payments in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Program and Reductions in Clinical Spending Needed for CMS to Avoid Financial Losses.“改善护理综合支付高级计划”中的和解付款以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心避免财务损失所需的临床支出削减。
JAMA. 2023 Apr 11;329(14):1221-1223. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1435.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Physician Group Practice Participation in Bundled Payments With Patient Selection, Costs, and Outcomes for Joint Replacement.医师集团参与打包付费与关节置换的患者选择、成本和结果的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 May 6;2(5):e210295. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0295. eCollection 2021 May.
2
Medicare's Bundled Payment Models-Progress and Pitfalls.医疗保险的捆绑支付模式——进展与困境
JAMA. 2022 May 10;327(18):1761-1762. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.6402.
3
Three-Year Impact Of Stratification In The Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.医疗保险医院再入院减少计划中分层的三年影响
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Mar;41(3):375-382. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01448.
4
Association of Participation in the Oncology Care Model With Medicare Payments, Utilization, Care Delivery, and Quality Outcomes.参与肿瘤治疗模式与医疗保险支付、利用、医疗服务提供和质量结果的关联。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 9;326(18):1829-1839. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17642.
5
Year 1 of the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-Advanced Model.支付方式改革-按疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)付费三年行动计划第一年。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):618-627. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2033678.
6
Hospital Participation Decisions In Medicare Bundled Payment Program Were Influenced By Third-Party Conveners.医疗保险捆绑支付计划中的医院参与决策受到第三方召集人的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Aug;40(8):1286-1293. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01766.
7
Improving target price calculations in Medicare bundled payment programs.改进医疗保险捆绑支付计划中的目标价格计算。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):635-642. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13675. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Efficacy Across 3 Common Operations.捆绑支付改善 3 种常见手术的护理效果。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):e16-e23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004869. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Association Between the Proportion of Black Patients Cared for at Hospitals and Financial Penalties Under Value-Based Payment Programs.医院中黑人患者比例与基于价值的支付计划下的财务处罚之间的关联。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 23;325(12):1219-1221. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0026.
10
CMS Innovation Center at 10 Years - Progress and Lessons Learned.医保与医疗补助服务中心创新中心成立十周年——进展与经验教训
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):759-764. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2031138. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

医院参与改善医疗保险支付的捆绑支付与医疗支出和医院激励支付的关联。

Association of Hospital Participation in Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced With Medicare Spending and Hospital Incentive Payments.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.

School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

JAMA. 2022 Oct 25;328(16):1616-1623. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18529.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2022.18529
PMID:36282256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9597389/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A) is a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) initiative that aims to produce financial savings by incentivizing decreases in clinical spending. Incentives consist of financial bonuses from CMS to hospitals or penalties paid by hospitals to CMS.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of hospital participation in BPCI-A with spending, and to characterize hospitals receiving financial bonuses vs penalties.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Difference-in-differences and cross-sectional analyses of 4 754 139 patient episodes using 2013-2019 US Medicare claims at 694 participating and 2852 nonparticipating hospitals merged with hospital and market characteristics.

EXPOSURES

BPCI-A model years 1 and 2 (October 1, 2018, through December 31, 2019).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Hospitals' per-episode spending, CMS gross and net spending, and the incentive allocated to each hospital.

RESULTS

The study identified 694 participating hospitals. The analysis observed a -$175 change in mean per-episode spending (95% CI, -$378 to $28) and an aggregate spending change of -$75.1 million (95% CI, -$162.1 million to $12.0 million) across the 428 670 episodes in BPCI-A model years 1 and 2. However, CMS disbursed $354.3 million (95% CI, $212.0 million to $496.0 million) more in bonuses than it received in penalties. Hospital participation in BPCI-A was associated with a net loss to CMS of $279.2 million (95% CI, $135.0 million to $423.0 million). Hospitals in the lowest quartile of Medicaid days received a mean penalty of $0.41 million; (95% CI, $0.09 million to $0.72 million), while those in the highest quartile received a mean bonus of $1.57 million; (95% CI, $1.09 million to $2.08 million). Similar patterns were observed for hospitals across increasing quartiles of Disproportionate Share Hospital percentage and of patients from racial and ethnic minority groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among US hospitals measured between 2013 and 2019, participation in BPCI-A was significantly associated with an increase in net CMS spending. Bonuses accrued disproportionately to hospitals providing care for marginalized communities.

摘要

重要性

医保和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的捆绑支付改善高级(BPCI-A)计划旨在通过激励临床支出减少来产生财务节省。激励措施包括 CMS 向医院提供的财务奖金或医院向 CMS 支付的罚款。

目的

调查医院参与 BPCI-A 与支出的关联,并描述获得财务奖金和罚款的医院。

设计、地点和参与者:使用 2013-2019 年美国医疗保险索赔中 694 家参与和 2852 家非参与医院的 4754139 例患者病例的差异-差异和横截面分析,并与医院和市场特征合并。

暴露因素

BPCI-A 模型年 1 年和 2 年(2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日)。

主要结果和测量

每家医院的每例费用、CMS 总费用和净费用以及分配给每家医院的激励。

结果

本研究确定了 694 家参与医院。分析观察到每例费用的平均变化为-175 美元(95%CI,-378 至 28 美元),在 BPCI-A 模型年 1 年和 2 年的 428670 例中,总支出变化为-7510 万美元(95%CI,-1.621 亿美元至 1200 万美元)。然而,CMS 发放的奖金比收到的罚款多 3.543 亿美元(95%CI,2.120 亿美元至 4.960 亿美元)。医院参与 BPCI-A 与 CMS 净损失 2.792 亿美元(95%CI,1.350 亿美元至 4.230 亿美元)相关。 Medicaid 天数最低四分位数的医院平均罚款为 410 万美元(95%CI,90 万美元至 720 万美元),而最高四分位数的医院平均奖金为 1570 万美元(95%CI,1090 万美元至 2080 万美元)。在 Disproportionate Share Hospital 比例和少数族裔患者比例不断增加的医院中,也观察到了类似的模式。

结论和相关性

在 2013 年至 2019 年期间测量的美国医院中,参与 BPCI-A 与 CMS 支出的净增加显著相关。奖金不成比例地流向为边缘化社区提供护理的医院。