McCormick Ellyse, Devine Susan, Crilly Julia, Brough Paula, Greenslade Jaimi
Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Apr;35(2):234-241. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14101. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
EDs are highly demanding workplaces generating considerable potential for occupational stress experiences. Previous research has been limited by a focus on specific aspects of the working environment and studies focussing on a range of variables are needed. The aim of the present study was to describe the perceptions of occupational stress and coping strategies of ED nurses and doctors and the differences between these two groups.
This cross-sectional study was conducted at a public metropolitan hospital ED in Queensland, Australia. All ED nurses and doctors were invited to participate in an electronic survey containing 13 survey measures and one qualitative question assessing occupational stress and coping experiences. Descriptive statistics were employed to report stressors. Responses to open-ended questions were thematically analysed.
Overall, 104 nurses and 35 doctors responded (55.6% response rate). Nurses reported higher levels of both stress and burnout than doctors. They also reported lower work satisfaction, work engagement, and leadership support than doctors. Compared with doctors, nurses reported significantly higher stress from heavy workload/poor skill mix, high acuity patients, environmental concerns, and inability to provide optimal care. Thematic analysis identified high workload and limited leadership and management support as factors contributing to stress. Coping mechanisms, such as building personal resilience, were most frequently reported.
The present study found organisational stressors adversely impact the well-being of ED nurses and doctors. Organisational-focused interventions including leadership development, strategic recruitment, adequate staffing and resources may mitigate occupational stress and complement individual coping strategies. Expanding this research to understand broader perspectives and especially the impact of COVID-19 upon ED workers is recommended.
急诊科是要求极高的工作场所,存在产生大量职业压力体验的巨大潜力。以往的研究局限于工作环境的特定方面,因此需要开展关注一系列变量的研究。本研究的目的是描述急诊科护士和医生对职业压力的认知及应对策略,以及这两组人员之间的差异。
本横断面研究在澳大利亚昆士兰州一家公立都市医院的急诊科开展。邀请所有急诊科护士和医生参与一项电子调查,该调查包含13项调查指标以及一个评估职业压力和应对经历的定性问题。采用描述性统计报告压力源。对开放式问题的回答进行主题分析。
总体而言,104名护士和35名医生做出了回应(回应率为55.6%)。护士报告的压力和倦怠水平均高于医生。他们还报告称工作满意度、工作投入度和领导支持度低于医生。与医生相比,护士报告称来自繁重工作量/技能组合不佳、高 acuity 患者、环境问题以及无法提供最佳护理的压力显著更高。主题分析确定高工作量以及有限的领导和管理支持是导致压力的因素。最常报告的应对机制是建立个人复原力。
本研究发现组织压力源对急诊科护士和医生的幸福感产生不利影响。以组织为重点的干预措施,包括领导力发展、战略招聘、充足的人员配备和资源,可能减轻职业压力并补充个人应对策略。建议扩大这项研究以了解更广泛的观点,特别是新冠疫情对急诊科工作人员的影响。