Guangdong Provincial Institute of Biological Products and Materia Medica, Guangzhou 510440, China.
Yangchun Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangdong 52960, China.
Vaccine. 2022 Nov 15;40(48):6947-6955. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.022. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections were the main cause of anogenital cancers and warts. HPV 6/11/16/18 vaccines provide protection against the high-risk types of HPV responsible for 70% of cervical cancers and 90% of genital warts. This randomized, blinded, non-inferiority phase III trial was to determine whether immunogenicity and tolerability would be non-inferior among women after receiving two novel 4- and 9-valent HPV vaccines (4vHPV, HPV 6/11/16/18; 9vHPV, HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) compared with those receiving Gardasil 4 (4-valent).
1680 females between 20 and 45 years were randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio to 20-26, 27-35, or 36-45 y groups. Subjects then equally assigned to receive 4vHPV, 9vHPV or Gardasil 4 (control) vaccine at months 0, 2, and 6. End points included non-inferiority of HPV-6/11/16/18 antibodies for 4vHPV versus control, and 9vHPV versus control and safety. The immunogenicity non-inferiority was pre-defined as the lower bound of 95% confidence interval (CI) of seroconversion rate (SCR) difference > -10% and the lower bound of 95% CI of geometric mean antibody titer (GMT) ratio > 0.5.
Among the three vaccine groups, more than 99% of the participants seroconverted to all 4 HPV types. The pre-specified statistical non-inferiority criterion for the immunogenicity hypothesis was met: all the lower bounds of 95% CIs on SCR differences exceeded -10% for each vaccine HPV type and the corresponding lower bounds of 95% CIs for GMT ratios > 0.5. Across vaccination groups, the most common vaccination reaction were injection-site adverse events (AEs), including pain, swelling, and redness. General and serious AEs were similar in the three groups. There were no deaths.
This study demonstrated that the novel 4- and 9-valent HPV vaccination was highly immunogenic and generally well tolerated, both of which were non-inferior to Gardasil 4 in immunogenicity and safety.
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染是肛门生殖器癌症和疣的主要原因。HPV 6/11/16/18 疫苗可预防导致 70%宫颈癌和 90%生殖器疣的高危型 HPV。这项随机、双盲、非劣效性 III 期试验旨在确定与接受佳达修 4(四价)相比,接受两种新型 4 价和 9 价 HPV 疫苗(4vHPV,HPV 6/11/16/18;9vHPV,HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58)的女性的免疫原性和耐受性是否非劣效。
1680 名 20 至 45 岁的女性按 2:1:1 的比例随机分为 20-26、27-35 和 36-45 岁组。然后,受试者等分为 4vHPV、9vHPV 或佳达修 4(对照)疫苗组,分别在 0、2 和 6 个月时接种。主要终点包括 4vHPV 与对照、9vHPV 与对照的 HPV-6/11/16/18 抗体非劣效性和安全性。免疫原性非劣效性的预先定义为血清转化率(SCR)差异的 95%置信区间(CI)下限> -10%和几何平均抗体滴度(GMT)比值的 95%CI 下限> 0.5。
在三组疫苗中,超过 99%的参与者对所有 4 种 HPV 类型均产生血清转化。免疫原性假设的预设统计学非劣效性标准得到满足:每种疫苗 HPV 类型的 SCR 差异的所有 95%CI 下限均超过 -10%,相应的 GMT 比值的 95%CI 下限均> 0.5。在所有接种组中,最常见的接种部位不良反应(AE)包括疼痛、肿胀和发红。三组的一般和严重 AE 相似。没有死亡。
本研究表明,新型 4 价和 9 价 HPV 疫苗具有高度的免疫原性,且通常具有良好的耐受性,在免疫原性和安全性方面均不劣于佳达修 4。