Osiurak François, Claidière Nicolas, Federico Giovanni
Laboratoire d'Étude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université de Lyon, 5 avenue Pierre Mendès France, 69676 Bron Cedex, France; Institut Universitaire de France, 1 rue Descartes, 75231 Paris Cedex 5, France.
Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, LPC, 3 Place Victor Hugo, 13331 Marseille, France.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;27(1):30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.024. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
The dominant view of cumulative technological culture suggests that high-fidelity transmission rests upon a high-fidelity copying ability, which allows individuals to reproduce the tool-use actions performed by others without needing to understand them (i.e., without causal reasoning). The opposition between copying versus reasoning is well accepted but with little supporting evidence. In this article, we investigate this distinction by examining the cognitive science literature on tool use. Evidence indicates that the ability to reproduce others' tool-use actions requires causal understanding, which questions the copying versus reasoning distinction and the cognitive reality of the so-called copying ability. We conclude that new insights might be gained by considering causal understanding as a key driver of cumulative technological culture.
关于累积性技术文化的主流观点认为,高保真传播依赖于高保真复制能力,这种能力使个体能够复制他人执行的工具使用行为,而无需理解这些行为(即无需因果推理)。复制与推理之间的对立已被广泛接受,但支持证据很少。在本文中,我们通过研究关于工具使用的认知科学文献来探讨这种区别。证据表明,复制他人工具使用行为的能力需要因果理解,这对复制与推理的区别以及所谓复制能力的认知现实提出了质疑。我们得出结论,将因果理解视为累积性技术文化的关键驱动力可能会带来新的见解。