• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
2020 COVID-19-Related Lockdown: the Relationships Between Coping Strategies, Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Among a Non-clinical Sample of British Adults.2020年与新冠疫情相关的封锁措施:英国成年人非临床样本中应对策略、心理调适与心理韧性之间的关系
Advers Resil Sci. 2022;3(4):297-307. doi: 10.1007/s42844-022-00079-5. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
2
Coping with COVID: Cross-sectional study to assess the psychological impact and coping strategies utilized by Indian internet users during the lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic.应对新冠疫情:一项横断面研究,旨在评估印度互联网用户在新冠疫情封锁期间所受到的心理影响以及所采用的应对策略。
Ind Psychiatry J. 2021 Jan-Jun;30(1):29-35. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_202_20. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
3
Secondary traumatic stress and vicarious posttraumatic growth in healthcare workers during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Greece: The role of resilience and coping strategies.希腊首次新冠疫情封锁期间医护人员的继发性创伤应激和替代性创伤后成长:复原力和应对策略的作用
Psychiatriki. 2021 Apr 19;32(1):19-25. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.001. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Coping styles and mental health in response to societal changes during the COVID-19 pandemic.应对 COVID-19 大流行期间社会变化的应对方式和心理健康。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;67(5):540-549. doi: 10.1177/0020764020961790. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
5
A cross-sectional study of coping strategies and resilience and its association with psychological symptoms of doctors working in a dedicated COVID-19 care center.一项关于在专门的新冠肺炎护理中心工作的医生应对策略、心理韧性及其与心理症状关联的横断面研究。
Ind Psychiatry J. 2023 Jan-Jun;32(1):31-36. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_128_21. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
6
Psychological Resilience, Coping, and Distress in Admitted Patients With COVID-19 Infection.COVID-19 感染住院患者的心理弹性、应对方式和压力。
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2022 May 5;24(3):21m03230. doi: 10.4088/PCC.21m03230.
7
The relationship between anxiety, coping strategies and characteristics of patients with diabetes.焦虑、应对策略与糖尿病患者特征之间的关系。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Oct 13;6:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-79.
8
Resilience and psychological distress in pregnant women during quarantine due to the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain: a multicentre cross-sectional online survey.COVID-19 疫情期间西班牙孕妇隔离期间的韧性和心理困扰:一项多中心横断面在线调查。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jun;42(2):115-122. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2021.1896491. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
Depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in Brazilian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Predictors and association with life satisfaction, psychological well-being and coping strategies.巴西大学生在 COVID-19 大流行期间的抑郁、焦虑和压力症状:预测因素及其与生活满意度、心理幸福感和应对策略的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258493. eCollection 2021.
10
Psychological distress and resilience in a multicentre sample of adolescents and young adults with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间癌症青少年和青年多中心样本中的心理困扰和韧性。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):201-213. doi: 10.1177/13591045211056923. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Coping behaviors and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: situational and habitual effects on mental distress with hybrid model analysis.新冠疫情期间的应对行为与心理健康:基于混合模型分析的情境与习惯对心理困扰的影响
Discov Ment Health. 2025 Aug 2;5(1):114. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00263-w.
2
An Unprecedented Experience: Personal and Socio-Political Impacts of the COVID-19 Lockdown in Saudi Arabia.一次前所未有的经历:沙特阿拉伯新冠疫情封锁措施的个人及社会政治影响
Cureus. 2024 Feb 25;16(2):e54857. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54857. eCollection 2024 Feb.

2020年与新冠疫情相关的封锁措施:英国成年人非临床样本中应对策略、心理调适与心理韧性之间的关系

2020 COVID-19-Related Lockdown: the Relationships Between Coping Strategies, Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Among a Non-clinical Sample of British Adults.

作者信息

Lafarge Caroline, Milani Raffaella, Cahill Sharon, Görzig Anke

机构信息

School of Human and Social Sciences, University of West London, Paragon House, Boston Manor Road, Brentford, London, TW8 9GA UK.

Psychology and Counselling, School of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, Royal Naval College, Park Row, Greenwich, London, SE10 9LS UK.

出版信息

Advers Resil Sci. 2022;3(4):297-307. doi: 10.1007/s42844-022-00079-5. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1007/s42844-022-00079-5
PMID:36284516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9584239/
Abstract

To curb COVID-19 infections, the British government enforced a series of lockdowns resulting in restrictions on movement and socialisation. This study assessed which groups may have been at higher risk of emotional distress among a non-clinical sample of British adults. It also examined which coping strategies, if any, related to more positive psychological adjustment and higher resilience scores. A cross-sectional, correlational study was carried out. Using a convenience sample, an online survey was conducted in April-June 2020. One hundred ninety-four participants completed the Brief COPE (coping), the GAD-7 (anxiety), the PHQ-9 (depression), the CD-RISC (resilience), and provided demographic information. Participants used mainly coping strategies considered to be adaptive. They exhibited mild/moderate anxiety and depression symptoms, and moderate resilience scores. However, some individuals displayed significantly higher distress symptoms and lower resilience scores than others, especially those aged under 35 (particularly 18-24), those not working, those who were single and/or childless. Results also show that coping strategies including substance use, behavioural disengagement and self-blame were associated with anxiety and/or depression symptoms, conversely, positive reframing related to lower anxiety symptomatology. Interventions promoting positive reframing may be helpful. Similarly, interventions promoting connection to others, a factor known to enhance resilience, may be beneficial. This is particularly relevant to groups who may be more at risk of psychological distress, such as young individuals.

摘要

为遏制新冠病毒感染,英国政府实施了一系列封锁措施,导致行动和社交受限。本研究评估了在英国成年人的非临床样本中,哪些群体可能面临更高的情绪困扰风险。研究还考察了哪些应对策略(若有的话)与更积极的心理调适及更高的心理复原力得分相关。开展了一项横断面相关性研究。利用便利抽样法,于2020年4月至6月进行了一项在线调查。194名参与者完成了简易应对方式问卷(应对)、广泛性焦虑障碍量表(焦虑)、患者健康问卷-9(抑郁)、 Connor-Davidson心理韧性量表(心理韧性),并提供了人口统计学信息。参与者主要采用被认为是适应性的应对策略。他们表现出轻度/中度焦虑和抑郁症状,心理韧性得分中等。然而,一些个体表现出的困扰症状明显高于其他个体,心理韧性得分较低,尤其是35岁以下人群(特别是18-24岁)、未工作人群、单身和/或无子女的人群。结果还表明,包括物质使用、行为脱离和自责在内的应对策略与焦虑和/或抑郁症状相关,相反,积极重新评价与较低的焦虑症状相关。促进积极重新评价的干预措施可能会有所帮助。同样,促进与他人联系的干预措施,这是一个已知能增强心理韧性的因素,可能会有益处。这对那些可能面临更大心理困扰风险的群体,如年轻人,尤为重要。