National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2022 Dec;38(12):1035-1046. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2022.2136160. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
Our study aims to compare the effect of metformin, inositol and their combinations on the efficiency in improving outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies in women with PCOS.
PubMed, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, MEDLINE. The search was performed on studies published before November 14, 2021, to identify articles evaluating the effectiveness of treatment metformin and inositol on ART outcomes.
The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 checklist and registered in the PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021287887. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English that compared metformin or inositol or metformin + inositol treatment with placebo or no treatment in women with PCOS undergoing assisted reproduction were included. In addition, RCTs with comparison combination and single metformin or inositol treatment were also included.
35 RCTs were included for qualitative analysis reporting on 4668 participants. In group of Metformin treatment were included 1891 patients, in Myo-inositol group - 281, in inositol + metformin group were included 110 participants and in control group (placebo or absence of treatment) - 1865 women with PCOS. 5 meta-analyses were performed. CPR in comparison of metformin and placebo in 1312 patients were higher in metformin group (RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.50, = 0.0004). OHSS was less in metformin (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.69, = 0.003). However, LBR were not statistically significant (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.36, = 0.24). In comparison of inositol and no treatment there was also no difference in CPR (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.79 to 2.38, = 0.26). As for metformin and inositol meta-analysis in 220 patients with PCOS, CPR were higher in inositol group (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.05 to 2.18, = 0.03). Combination treatment included only two RCTs and was illegible for meta-analysis.
To our knowledge, it is the first meta-analysis that estimates inositol treatment compared to metformin. Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, metformin seems to be a good option for improving ART outcomes in women with PCOS. However, it is not clear whether inositol usage is adequate. Nevertheless, we need more clinical trials of good quality to answer all questions thoroughly.
本研究旨在比较二甲双胍、肌醇及其联合应用对多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者辅助生殖技术结局的影响。
PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov、Embase、MEDLINE。检索时间为 2021 年 11 月 14 日前发表的研究,以确定评估二甲双胍和肌醇治疗对 ART 结局影响的文章。
系统评价根据 PRISMA 2020 清单进行,并在 PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021287887 中进行了注册。纳入了比较二甲双胍或肌醇或二甲双胍+肌醇治疗与安慰剂或不治疗 PCOS 女性辅助生殖的随机对照试验(RCT)。此外,还纳入了比较联合治疗和单一二甲双胍或肌醇治疗的 RCT。
纳入了 35 项定性分析报告,共纳入 4668 名参与者的 RCT。在二甲双胍治疗组中纳入了 1891 名患者,肌醇组纳入了 281 名,肌醇+二甲双胍组纳入了 110 名,对照组(安慰剂或无治疗)纳入了 1865 名 PCOS 女性。进行了 5 项荟萃分析。在 1312 名接受二甲双胍和安慰剂治疗的患者中,与安慰剂相比,二甲双胍组的临床妊娠率(CPR)更高(RR=1.30,95%CI:1.12 至 1.50, = 0.0004)。二甲双胍组卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)发生率较低(RR=0.34,95%CI:0.17 至 0.69, = 0.003)。然而,活产率(LBR)无统计学意义(RR=1.12,95%CI:0.93 至 1.36, = 0.24)。与无治疗相比,肌醇组的 CPR 也没有差异(RR=1.37,95%CI:0.79 至 2.38, = 0.26)。对于 220 名 PCOS 患者的二甲双胍和肌醇的荟萃分析,肌醇组的 CPR 更高(RR=1.52,95%CI:1.05 至 2.18, = 0.03)。联合治疗仅包括两项 RCT,无法进行荟萃分析。
据我们所知,这是首次评估肌醇治疗与二甲双胍的荟萃分析。基于我们的系统评价和荟萃分析,二甲双胍似乎是改善 PCOS 患者辅助生殖技术结局的一个不错选择。然而,目前尚不清楚肌醇的使用是否足够。尽管如此,我们仍需要更多高质量的临床试验来全面回答所有问题。