Støre Siri Jakobsson, Tillfors Maria, Wästlund Erik, Angelhoff Charlotte, Andersson Gerhard, Norell-Clarke Annika
Department of Social and Psychological Studies, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.
Crown Princess Victoria's Child and Youth Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (BKV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
J Sleep Res. 2023 Jun;32(3):e13758. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13758. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
The study objective was to assess if a 3-week intervention with the Somnox sleep robot had effects on symptoms of insomnia, somatic arousal, and/or concurrent symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with insomnia, compared with a waitlist-control group. The participants (n = 44) were randomized to a 3-week intervention with the sleep robot (n = 22), or to a waitlist-control group (n = 22). The primary outcome measure was the Insomnia Severity Index administered at baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention and at 1-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were the Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Additionally, sleep-onset latency, wake time after sleep onset, total sleep time and sleep efficiency were measured the week prior to and the last week of the intervention, both subjectively with the Consensus Sleep Diary and objectively with wrist actigraphy. Mixed-effects models were used to analyse data. The effect of the sleep robot on the participants' insomnia severity was not statistically significant. The differences between the intervention group and the control group on the measures of arousal, anxiety and depression were also not statistically significant, and neither were the sleep diary and actigraphy variables. In conclusion, a 3-week intervention with daily at-home use of the robot was not found to be an effective method to relieve the symptom burden in adults with insomnia.
本研究的目的是评估与等待名单对照组相比,使用Somnox睡眠机器人进行为期3周的干预对失眠成年人的失眠症状、躯体觉醒以及抑郁和焦虑并发症状是否有影响。参与者(n = 44)被随机分为两组,一组接受为期3周的睡眠机器人干预(n = 22),另一组为等待名单对照组(n = 22)。主要结局指标是在基线、干预中期、干预后以及1个月随访时进行的失眠严重程度指数评估。次要结局指标包括睡前觉醒量表以及医院焦虑抑郁量表。此外,在干预前一周和干预最后一周,通过共识睡眠日记主观测量以及腕部活动记录仪客观测量入睡潜伏期、睡眠开始后的觉醒时间、总睡眠时间和睡眠效率。采用混合效应模型分析数据。睡眠机器人对参与者失眠严重程度的影响无统计学意义。干预组与对照组在觉醒、焦虑和抑郁测量指标上的差异也无统计学意义,睡眠日记和活动记录仪变量同样无统计学意义。总之,未发现每天在家使用机器人进行为期3周的干预是缓解失眠成年人症状负担的有效方法。