Dean Angela J, Wilson Kerrie A
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Conserv Biol. 2023 Apr;37(2):e14009. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14020. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
The loss and degradation of nature can lead to hopelessness and despair, which may undermine engagement in conservation actions. Emerging movements, such as that behind the organization Conservation Optimism, aim to avert potential despair of those involved in conservation. Some argue that fostering positive states, such as hope or optimism, can motivate engagement and action; however, others question whether fostering hope or optimism may inadvertently undermine perceived gravity of conservation challenges. We examined this issue by quantifying dispositional hope and optimism with a representative sample of Australians (n = 4285) and assessing their relationship with indicators of conservation engagement. We used the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) in Australia as a case study. We asked participants what they could do to help the GBR, then classified their responses into 2 outcome variables: identifying climate actions (i.e., actions that tackle the main threat to the reef) and identifying plastic actions (i.e., actions that are popular among community members). We also quantified likelihood of performing these actions and appraisals of both threats and actions. One dimension of hope, hope pathways (defined by Snyder's hope theory as knowing different ways to act), was associated with greater capacity to identify climate-related behaviors (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44) and plastic reduction behaviors (OR = 1.22) and greater likelihood of adopting climate-related actions (β = 0.20). Optimism was associated with recognition of plastic reduction behaviors only (OR = 1.22). Neither hope nor optimism undermined appraisal of conservation threats. The effects of optimism were mediated by reduced action futility, and effects of hope pathways were mediated by stronger perceptions of threats to the reef (threat appraisal) and confidence in performing useful actions (coping appraisal). Our findings suggest that dispositional hope can strengthen, rather than undermine, appraisal of conservation challenges and solutions and thereby increase conservation engagement.
自然的丧失和退化会导致绝望和无助,这可能会削弱人们参与保护行动的积极性。一些新兴运动,比如“保护乐观主义”组织背后的运动,旨在避免参与保护工作的人产生潜在的绝望情绪。一些人认为,培养积极的心态,如希望或乐观情绪,可以激发人们的参与和行动;然而,另一些人质疑培养希望或乐观情绪是否可能会无意中削弱人们对保护挑战严重性的认识。我们通过对澳大利亚的一个代表性样本(n = 4285)进行性格希望和乐观情绪的量化,并评估它们与保护参与指标之间的关系,来研究这个问题。我们以澳大利亚的大堡礁(GBR)为例进行研究。我们询问参与者他们可以做些什么来帮助大堡礁,然后将他们的回答分类为两个结果变量:识别气候行动(即应对珊瑚礁主要威胁的行动)和识别塑料行动(即在社区成员中流行的行动)。我们还对执行这些行动的可能性以及对威胁和行动的评估进行了量化。希望的一个维度,即希望途径(根据斯奈德的希望理论定义为知道不同的行动方式),与识别气候相关行为(优势比[OR] = 1.44)和减少塑料行为(OR = 1.22)的能力更强以及采取气候相关行动的可能性更大(β = 0.20)相关。乐观情绪仅与识别减少塑料行为相关(OR = 1.22)。希望和乐观情绪都没有削弱对保护威胁的评估。乐观情绪的影响是通过减少行动的徒劳感来介导 的,而希望途径的影响是通过对珊瑚礁威胁的更强烈认知(威胁评估)和对执行有用行动的信心(应对评估)来介导的。我们的研究结果表明,性格希望可以加强而不是削弱对保护挑战和解决方案的评估,从而增加保护参与度。