Poulgrain John William, Bremner Niquaila May, Zimmerman Hannah, Jao Chia-Wei, Winter Taylor, Riordan Benjamin Charles, Bizumic Boris, Hunter John, Scarf Damian
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
Department of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6140, New Zealand.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Oct 7;12(10):384. doi: 10.3390/bs12100384.
The media perpetuates many harmful stereotypes about people with mental illness. In two studies, we demonstrate the impact of negative media portrayals of mental illness on prejudice and attempt to mitigate these negative effects. Specifically, in Study 1, participants watched the movie , a recent film which associates mental illness with violent behavior, or a control film (). Participants completed the Prejudice towards People with Mental Illness (PPMI) scale before and after viewing their respective films. The PPMI consists of four dimensions: fear/avoidance (i.e., wanting to avoid people with mental illness), malevolence (i.e., viewing people with mental illness as inferior), authoritarianism (i.e., preference for control over people with mental illness), and unpredictability (i.e., the behavior of people with mental illness is unreliable). We hypothesized that participants who watched the film would display an increase in their fear/avoidance of people with mental illness and their support for authoritarian approaches to their treatment. Consistent with these hypotheses, participants who viewed displayed a significant increase in the fear/avoidance and authoritarian subscales of the PPMI, relative to participants that watched . In Study 2, in an attempt to mitigate the impact of on prejudice towards people with mental illness, directly after the film we displayed educational and counter-stereotypical statements on-screen that challenged the view that people with mental illness are violent. A control group viewed without these statements. Identical to Study 1, all participants completed the PPMI scale before and after viewing the film. We hypothesized that participants who viewed with the statements would display lower prejudice relative to the control condition. Unfortunately, participants in the experimental and control conditions displayed a comparable increase in prejudice. Together, these studies confirm the negative effect of media portrayals of mental illness (as depicted in ) and demonstrate that these effects are not easily mitigated.
媒体使许多关于精神疾病患者的有害刻板印象长期存在。在两项研究中,我们展示了媒体对精神疾病的负面描绘对偏见的影响,并试图减轻这些负面影响。具体而言,在研究1中,参与者观看了电影《[电影名]》(一部近期将精神疾病与暴力行为联系起来的电影)或一部对照电影(《[对照电影名]》)。参与者在观看各自的电影前后完成了《对精神疾病患者的偏见》(PPMI)量表。PPMI由四个维度组成:恐惧/回避(即想要避开精神疾病患者)、恶意(即认为精神疾病患者低人一等)、威权主义(即倾向于对精神疾病患者进行控制)和不可预测性(即精神疾病患者的行为不可靠)。我们假设观看《[电影名]》的参与者对精神疾病患者的恐惧/回避以及对其治疗的威权主义方法的支持会增加。与这些假设一致,观看《[电影名]》的参与者在PPMI的恐惧/回避和威权主义子量表上的得分相对于观看《[对照电影名]》的参与者有显著增加。在研究2中,为了减轻《[电影名]》对精神疾病患者偏见的影响,在电影播放后,我们立即在屏幕上展示了具有教育意义和反刻板印象的陈述,这些陈述挑战了精神疾病患者具有暴力倾向的观点。一个对照组观看《[电影名]》时没有这些陈述。与研究1相同,所有参与者在观看电影前后都完成了PPMI量表。我们假设观看带有这些陈述的《[电影名]》的参与者相对于对照组会表现出更低的偏见。不幸的是,实验组和对照组的参与者在偏见方面都有类似程度的增加。总之,这些研究证实了媒体对精神疾病的描绘(如《[电影名]》中所呈现的)的负面影响,并表明这些影响不容易减轻。