• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头胎子女的性别是否会影响乳腺癌风险和生存:超过 100 万例病例的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Does the Sex of the Firstborn Child Affect the Breast Cancer Risk and Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Over 1 Million Cases.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, İstanbul Aydın University, İstanbul, Turkey

Department of Population Medicine, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

出版信息

Balkan Med J. 2022 Nov 7;39(6):429-435. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2022.2022-5-54. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

DOI:10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2022.2022-5-54
PMID:36285976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9667212/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reports on the risk and prognosis of breast cancer in relation to the sex of a child have been conflicting. Since medical sciences play an important role in informing sociocultural understandings of health and illness, evidence-based studies have the potential to foster or counter stigma and shape social attitudes toward a newborn’s sex.

AIMS

To pool all available evidence to provide the highest level of evidence on the association between the sex of the first child and breast cancer risk or prognosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analyses.

METHODS

A comprehensive search using three databases was conducted from inception until May 2020. Titles and abstracts of all papers identified were independently screened by two authors. Data extraction and quality assessment were also performed independently by two researchers. The breast cancer risk was quantified using the odds ratio, and the prognosis (i.e., mortality) was measured using the risk ratio.

RESULTS

In the meta-analysis, 11 studies with more than 1 million participants were included. The pooled estimate from the five studies on risk and the six studies on prognosis were odds ratio 0.99 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.03) and risk ratio 1.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.26), respectively.

CONCLUSION

When we pooled all available evidence, the sex of the firstborn child was neither associated with risk nor prognosis in breast cancer. Clinically, our findings are reassuring and important, especially in light of previous studies that recommended differential treatment and counseling based on the sex of the first child. Socially, our findings challenge conventional social stereotypes that regard male children as biologically superior to female children.

摘要

背景

关于儿童性别与乳腺癌风险和预后的关系的报告结果相互矛盾。由于医学科学在告知社会文化对健康和疾病的理解方面发挥着重要作用,因此基于证据的研究有可能助长或抵制耻辱感,并塑造社会对新生儿性别的态度。

目的

汇总所有现有证据,为第一胎子女性别与乳腺癌风险或预后之间的关联提供最高水平的证据。

研究设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

从创建数据库开始,到 2020 年 5 月,我们使用三个数据库进行了全面搜索。两名作者独立筛选所有论文的标题和摘要。两名研究人员还独立进行了数据提取和质量评估。使用比值比量化乳腺癌风险,使用风险比测量预后(即死亡率)。

结果

荟萃分析纳入了 11 项超过 100 万参与者的研究。五项关于风险的研究和六项关于预后的研究的汇总估计值分别为比值比 0.99(95%置信区间,0.95-1.03)和风险比 1.00(95%置信区间,0.80-1.26)。

结论

当我们汇总所有现有证据时,第一胎子女的性别与乳腺癌的风险或预后均无关联。从临床角度来看,我们的研究结果令人放心且非常重要,尤其是考虑到先前的研究建议根据第一胎子女的性别进行差异化治疗和咨询。从社会角度来看,我们的研究结果挑战了认为男童在生物学上优于女童的传统社会刻板印象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7761/9667212/3dcbe4c719f4/BMJ-39-429-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7761/9667212/894a2b5a8fcd/BMJ-39-429-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7761/9667212/cddb2e03b03d/BMJ-39-429-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7761/9667212/3dcbe4c719f4/BMJ-39-429-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7761/9667212/894a2b5a8fcd/BMJ-39-429-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7761/9667212/cddb2e03b03d/BMJ-39-429-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7761/9667212/3dcbe4c719f4/BMJ-39-429-g4.jpg

相似文献

1
Does the Sex of the Firstborn Child Affect the Breast Cancer Risk and Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Over 1 Million Cases.头胎子女的性别是否会影响乳腺癌风险和生存:超过 100 万例病例的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Balkan Med J. 2022 Nov 7;39(6):429-435. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2022.2022-5-54. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
2
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染及牙列不齐之间的关联。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001.
3
The effect of exposure to long working hours on stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.长时间工作暴露对中风的影响:来自世卫组织/国际劳工组织工作相关疾病和伤害负担联合估算的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Int. 2020 Sep;142:105746. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105746. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴的使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染和牙齿咬合不正的关系。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2005 Jul;3(6):147-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2005.00024.x.
6
The effect of exposure to long working hours on depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.暴露于长工时对抑郁症的影响:来自世界卫生组织/国际劳工组织工作相关疾病和伤害负担联合估算的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Int. 2021 Oct;155:106629. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106629. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
7
Aspirin for prophylactic use in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: a systematic review and overview of reviews.阿司匹林用于心血管疾病和癌症一级预防的预防性使用:系统评价和综述概述。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Sep;17(43):1-253. doi: 10.3310/hta17430.
8
The effect of exposure to long working hours on ischaemic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.长时间工作暴露对缺血性心脏病的影响:来自世卫组织/国际劳工组织工作相关疾病和伤害负担联合估算的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Int. 2020 Sep;142:105739. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105739. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
9
10
Association of Circulating Tumor DNA With Disease-Free Survival in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.循环肿瘤 DNA 与乳腺癌无病生存的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2026921. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26921.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-genetic factors and breast cancer: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.非遗传因素与乳腺癌:荟萃分析的伞式综述。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 26;24(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12641-8.

本文引用的文献

1
How Does Economic Inequality Affect Infanticide Rates? An Analysis of 15 Years of Death Records and Representative Economic Data.经济不平等如何影响杀婴率?对 15 年死亡记录和代表性经济数据的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 30;16(19):3679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193679.
2
A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research.临床研究中偏倚评估的统一框架。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019 Jun;17(2):106-120. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000165.
3
Breast Cancer Risk After Recent Childbirth: A Pooled Analysis of 15 Prospective Studies.
近期分娩后乳腺癌风险:15 项前瞻性研究的汇总分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):22-30. doi: 10.7326/M18-1323. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
4
A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis.一种新的改进的图形和定量方法,用于检测荟萃分析中的偏倚。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018 Dec;16(4):195-203. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000141.
5
Offspring sex ratio at birth and maternal breast cancer risk: A case-control study and meta-analysis of literature.出生时的子代性别比例与母亲患乳腺癌的风险:一项病例对照研究及文献荟萃分析
EXCLI J. 2010 Jul 26;9:76-81. eCollection 2010.
6
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
7
From Crime to Disease: Laws on Infanticide in the Modern Era.从犯罪到疾病:现代社会的杀婴法律
Neonatology. 2016;109(3):170-6. doi: 10.1159/000441275. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
8
Sex of First Child and Breast Cancer Survival in Young Women.年轻女性头胎子女的性别与乳腺癌生存率
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Aug 14. doi: 10.1089/jwh.152460901750269643.
9
Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials II: The quality effects model.异质性临床试验的Meta分析进展II:质量效应模型
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 21.
10
Height, age at menarche and risk of hormone receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer: a cohort study.身高、初潮年龄与激素受体阳性和阴性乳腺癌风险:一项队列研究。
Int J Cancer. 2013 Jun 1;132(11):2619-29. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27913. Epub 2012 Nov 14.