Presentation and subsequent care of dental injuries sustained by New Zealand adults.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Injuries to permanent teeth are common and can have lasting effects, but knowledge of their consequences is deficient because there is a lack of information from longitudinal follow-up studies of adult populations. The aim of this study was to use routinely collected adult dental trauma data from New Zealand's no-fault, Government-run social insurance scheme-the Accident Compensation Corporation-to investigate the presentation and subsequent care of dental injuries sustained by adults.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of all new dental injuries recorded during 2008 was followed by prospective analysis of all treatment claimed in the following five years for all new injuries recorded in June 2008 for adults aged 18+ years. Those injuries were categorised into five clinically meaningful, ordinal groups of dental injuries, ranging from least severe (Minor injury) to most severe (Severe displacement). The prospective post-injury treatment information was summarised as (1) restorations; (2) crowns and veneers; (3) completed root canal treatment (preparation and obturation of root canal[s]); (4) extraction (extraction; surgical removal); and (5) implant placement.

RESULTS

Orofacial trauma details were recorded for 32 110 individuals (of all ages) in 2008; males predominated in all age groups, except for those aged 65+ years. Of the 68 890 separate injuries to permanent teeth recorded, 74.9% involved maxillary teeth, with almost 50% involving teeth 21 and 11. Some 66.9% of the dental injuries were classified as Minor; 21.7% involved Fractures or loosening, and 8.2% were Severe fractures. Displacement and Severe displacement injuries comprised 1.8% and 2.5% respectively. During June 2008, dental injuries were recorded for 1325 adults. More than 80% of those dental injuries underwent treatment during the subsequent five years, and more severe initial trauma required more complicated treatment. Minor injuries accounted for 33.5%, fractures/loosening for 50.8%, severe fractures for 1.2%, displacements for 8.8%, and severe displacements for 5.8% of the total cost of treatment provided over that five-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most injuries sustained were minor, their subsequent treatment burden is not only high but also greater with more severe initial trauma. The ongoing societal cost of orofacial trauma appears to be high.