Department of Restorative Dentistry, University North of Parana, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Department of Oral Medicine and Pediatric Dentistry, State University of Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2022 Sep-Oct;33(5):74-80. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202205084.
The longevity of prosthetic rehabilitation is determined by the stability of the implant and abutment interfaces. True morse taper connections on dental restorations have been effective, however activation force still empirical. This work compared the activation strength and internal contact of Morse taper system according to the removal force. Eighty sets, composed of implants and prosthetic abutments, were evaluated with different internal contact areas; 15.12mm2 (G3.3) and 21.25mm2 (G4.3). The specimens were activated at 0° and 30°, with loads of 10, 20, 40 and 60N. The specimens were submitted to tensile test and the data to ANOVA and Tukey's tests (α=0.05). Representative specimens were examined under SEM. Removal force of G3.3 (2.15±1.33MPa) did not differed to G4.3 (1.99±1.03MPa). The activation at 0º (2.95±0.98MPa) statistically differed to 30º (1.19±0.54MPa). The 60N load was statistically superior for G3.3 and there was no statistical difference between 20N to 60N in G4.3. The values of 10N at 30o and 20N at the long axis of the morse taper implant, independent of the frictional contact area showed the best settlement.
修复体的使用寿命取决于种植体和基台界面的稳定性。牙修复体上真正的莫氏锥度连接是有效的,然而激活力仍然是经验性的。本研究根据去除力比较了莫氏锥度系统的激活强度和内部接触。评估了由种植体和修复基台组成的 80 组不同内部接触面积的样本;15.12mm2(G3.3)和 21.25mm2(G4.3)。将样本在 0°和 30°下以 10、20、40 和 60N 的负载激活。对样本进行拉伸试验,并对数据进行方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α=0.05)。代表性样本在 SEM 下进行检查。G3.3 的去除力(2.15±1.33MPa)与 G4.3 的去除力(1.99±1.03MPa)没有差异。0°时的激活(2.95±0.98MPa)与 30°时的激活(1.19±0.54MPa)有统计学差异。G3.3 中 60N 的负载具有统计学优势,而在 G4.3 中,20N 到 60N 之间没有统计学差异。30°时 10N 和莫氏锥度种植体长轴上 20N 的值,独立于摩擦接触面积,显示出最佳的稳定性。