Fossmo Jøran Ersdal, van den Tillaar Roland
Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, Nord University, 7600 Levanger, Norway.
Sports (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;10(10):148. doi: 10.3390/sports10100148.
The purpose of this review was to examine how different relative loads in weight training can improve acceleration over 10 m from a standing or flying start. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using the following databases: PubMed, MedLine, Google Scholar, and SPORTDiscus. Studies were eligible if they met the following criteria: (1) participants were at least 15 years or older and healthy and injury free, (2) the study included at least one exercise for the lower body with a strength training frequency of at least once a week and included a training period of at least four weeks, and (3) interventions with clear pre- and post-test results on 10 m sprint or 10 m flying start are stated. Non-English-language articles were excluded. Percent change and between-group effect size (ES) were calculated to compare the effects of different training interventions. Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The results were categorized into four groups: (1) explosive weight training with light loads at 30-60% of 1-RM, (2) explosive weight training with moderate loads at 60-85% of 1-RM, (3) maximal weight training at 85-100% of 1-RM, and (4) hypertrophy training at 60-85% of 1-RM. At 10 m, all methods of weight training demonstrated improvements, and maximal weight training demonstrated the highest results with a large ES, while other approaches varied from very small to moderate ES. Weight training showed little progression with a significantly lower effect on flying start across all training methods, except for one group that trained power cleans (hypertrophy) where progress was large. To improve acceleration over the first 10 m, this review demonstrated maximal weight training as the preferred training method. For athletes with a pre-existing high level of strength, it could be more appropriate to use explosive training with light loads or a combination of the two. To a lesser extent, acceleration from a flying start could be improved using both training methods as well.
本综述的目的是研究重量训练中不同的相对负荷如何提高从站立起跑或行进间起跑开始的10米加速能力。使用以下数据库对文献进行了系统综述:PubMed、MedLine、谷歌学术和SPORTDiscus。符合以下标准的研究才具有资格:(1)参与者年龄至少为15岁,身体健康且无损伤;(2)该研究包括至少一项针对下肢的运动,力量训练频率至少为每周一次,且训练期至少为四周;(3)记录了在10米短跑或10米行进间起跑方面有明确的测试前和测试后结果的干预措施。非英文文章被排除在外。计算了百分比变化和组间效应量(ES)以比较不同训练干预措施的效果。49项研究符合纳入标准。结果分为四组:(1)以1-RM的30%-60%进行轻负荷爆发性重量训练;(2)以1-RM的60%-85%进行中等负荷爆发性重量训练;(3)以1-RM的85%-100%进行最大重量训练;(4)以1-RM的60%-85%进行肥大训练。在10米处,所有重量训练方法均显示出进步,最大重量训练的效果最佳,ES值较大,而其他方法的ES值从非常小到中等不等。重量训练的进展不大,除了一组进行强力抓举(肥大训练)的进展较大外,所有训练方法对行进间起跑的影响都显著较低。为了提高前10米的加速能力,本综述表明最大重量训练是首选的训练方法。对于已有较高力量水平的运动员,使用轻负荷爆发性训练或两者结合可能更合适。在较小程度上,两种训练方法也都可以提高行进间起跑的加速能力。