Suppr超能文献

不同类型离心超负荷训练对女子篮球运动员力量、速度、功率及变向能力的影响

The Effects of Different Types of Eccentric Overload Training on Strength, Speed, Power and Change of Direction in Female Basketball Players.

作者信息

O Brien Joey, Browne Declan, Earls Des

机构信息

HealthCore, Department of Science and Health, Institute of Technology Carlow, Carlow R93 V960, Ireland.

出版信息

J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020 Jul 16;5(3):50. doi: 10.3390/jfmk5030050.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two types of eccentric (ECC) overload training on strength, speed, power and change of direction in female basketball players. Twenty amateur basketball players (mean ± SD: age: 23.67 ± 6.05 years; height: 1.73 ± 0.05 m; body mass: 80.28 ± 17.67 kg) participated in a randomized trial. The players performed either flywheel inertial training (FIT) ( = 11) or tempo ECC training (TET) ( = 9) for 4 weeks, performing two sessions weekly. Performance characteristics, one repetition back squat (1RM), counter-movement jump (CMJ), squat jump (SJ), 10-metre sprint (10 m), change of direction (COD) and sit and reach flexibility (S&R) were tested pre and post intervention. Post-hoc testing revealed significant improvements in the FIT group for 1RM ( ≤ 0.001; ES = 0.59), 10 m ( = 0.003; ES = -0.54) and CMJ ( ≤ 0.001; ES = 1.04), while significant improvements were revealed in the TET group for 1RM ( = 0.007; ES = 0.71) and S&R ( ≤ 0.001; ES = 0.58). In conclusion, both FIT and TET groups demonstrated a positive training stimulus for increasing muscular strength. FIT may produce superior adaptions in CMJ and 10-m sprint, while TET may produce superior adaptions in S&R. Neither group achieved increases in either SJ or COD.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨两种离心(ECC)超负荷训练对女子篮球运动员力量、速度、功率和变向能力的影响。20名业余篮球运动员(平均±标准差:年龄:23.67±6.05岁;身高:1.73±0.05米;体重:80.28±17.67千克)参与了一项随机试验。运动员们进行了为期4周的飞轮惯性训练(FIT)(n = 11)或节奏性离心训练(TET)(n = 9),每周进行两次训练。在干预前后测试了运动表现特征、一次重复后蹲(1RM)、反向纵跳(CMJ)、深蹲跳(SJ)、10米冲刺跑(10 m)、变向(COD)和坐位体前屈柔韧性(S&R)。事后检验显示,FIT组在1RM(p≤0.001;ES = 0.59)、10 m(p = 0.003;ES = -0.54)和CMJ(p≤0.001;ES = 1.04)方面有显著改善,而TET组在1RM(p = 0.007;ES = 0.71)和S&R(p≤0.001;ES = 0.58)方面有显著改善。总之,FIT组和TET组在增加肌肉力量方面均表现出积极的训练刺激。FIT可能在CMJ和10米冲刺跑方面产生更好的适应性,而TET可能在S&R方面产生更好的适应性。两组在SJ或COD方面均未实现提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ce/7739370/43c92e06e798/jfmk-05-00050-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验