Suppr超能文献

超声引导是否能提高痉挛性斜颈患者肉毒毒素注射的疗效?(一项前瞻性、部分设盲、临床研究)。

Does Ultrasound Guidance Improve the Effectiveness of Neurotoxin Injections in Patients with Cervical Dystonia? (A Prospective, Partially-Blinded, Clinical Study).

机构信息

Department of Neurophysiology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, 93-513 Lodz, Poland.

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.

出版信息

Toxins (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;14(10):674. doi: 10.3390/toxins14100674.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound guidance (US) in the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD) with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injections in comparison to anatomical landmarks (AL). To date, US is routinely used in many centers, but others deny its usefulness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients (12 males, 23 females) with a clinical diagnosis of CD were included in the study. Intramuscular administration of BoNT-A was performed using either US guidance, or with AL, in two separate therapeutic sessions. The efficacy of BoNT-A administration was assessed with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), Tsui modified scale, Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I). Additionally, patients at therapeutic sessions were digitally recorded and evaluated by two blinded and independent raters.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in total TWSTRS, severity subscale TWSTRS, Tsui score, and CDQ-24 was found in both the AL and US group; however, in the TWSTRS disability and pain subscales, a significant decrease was found only in the US group. Moreover, US guided treatment also resulted in a greater decrease in TWSTRS, Tsui score and CDQ-24 compared to anatomical landmarks use only.

CONCLUSIONS

US guidance might be helpful in improving the results of BoNT-A injections in cervical dystonia, reducing associated pain and disability; however, more studies are needed to evaluate its clinical efficacy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估超声引导(US)与解剖标志(AL)相比,在肉毒毒素 A(BoNT-A)注射治疗颈肌张力障碍(CD)中的疗效。迄今为止,US 在许多中心已常规使用,但其他中心则否认其有用性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 35 名(12 名男性,23 名女性)临床诊断为 CD 的患者。采用 US 引导或在两个不同的治疗疗程中使用 AL 进行 BoNT-A 肌内注射。采用多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表(TWSTRS)、Tsui 改良量表、颅颈性肌张力障碍问卷(CDQ-24)和临床整体印象-改善量表(CGI-I)评估 BoNT-A 给药的疗效。此外,在治疗疗程中对患者进行数字化记录,并由两名盲法且独立的评估者进行评估。

结果

AL 和 US 组的总 TWSTRS、严重程度 TWSTRS 亚量表、Tsui 评分和 CDQ-24 均显著降低;但仅在 US 组的 TWSTRS 残疾和疼痛亚量表中发现显著降低。此外,与仅使用解剖标志相比,US 引导治疗还导致 TWSTRS、Tsui 评分和 CDQ-24 更大程度的降低。

结论

US 引导可能有助于提高 BoNT-A 注射治疗 CD 的疗效,减少相关疼痛和残疾;然而,还需要更多研究来评估其临床疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dafa/9610638/81c3a1482733/toxins-14-00674-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验