Shakeel Sadia, Iffat Wajiha, Nesar Shagufta, Shayan Sidra, Ali Aatka, Gajdács Márió, Jamshed Shazia
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dow College of Pharmacy, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan.
Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dow College of Pharmacy, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan.
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 10;7(10):291. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7100291.
Early intervention in sepsis management with recognized therapeutic targets may be effective in lowering sepsis-related morbidity and mortality, although this necessitates timely identification of sepsis by healthcare professionals. The present study aimed to assess knowledge levels, attitudes, and agreement among physicians regarding the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines (more specifically, the Hour-1 bundle). A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians working in different clinical settings in Karachi, Pakistan, using a self-administered questionnaire. The mean cumulative knowledge score of the respondents towards SSC was 6.8 ± 2.1 (out of 10), where a total of n = 127 respondents (51.62%) had a strong understanding of the SSC guidelines, compared to n = 78 (31.7%) and n = 41 (16.7%) respondents with fair and inadequate knowledge, respectively. The majorly known bundle elements by the respondents were to administer broad-spectrum antibiotics (89.8%, n = 221), the need for taking blood cultures before administering antibiotics (87.8%, n = 216), and measurement of blood lactate levels (75.6%, n = 186). Experienced physicians were more likely to use norepinephrine as the first-choice vasopressor (p < 0.001). Female respondents were more likely to consider the duration of antibiotic therapy to be determined according to the site of infection, the microbiological etiology, the patient’s response to treatment, and the likelihood of achieving adequate source control (p = 0.001). The current study concluded that respondents had an optimistic approach and frequently practice in accordance with the SSC guidelines, while some respondents were not up to date with the most recent guidelines. There is a need for further interventions and continuous medical education to encourage physicians towards appropriate use of the recommended guiding principles for improving treatment outcomes in sepsis patients.
尽管这需要医护人员及时识别脓毒症,但对脓毒症管理进行早期干预并采用公认的治疗靶点可能有效降低脓毒症相关的发病率和死亡率。本研究旨在评估医生对拯救脓毒症运动(SSC)指南(更具体地说是1小时集束治疗)的知识水平、态度和认同度。在巴基斯坦卡拉奇不同临床环境中工作的医生中进行了一项定量、描述性横断面研究,使用自填式问卷。受访者对SSC的平均累积知识得分为6.8±2.1(满分10分),其中共有127名受访者(51.62%)对SSC指南有深入理解,相比之下,分别有78名(31.7%)和41名(16.7%)受访者知识水平一般和不足。受访者主要知晓的集束治疗要素包括使用广谱抗生素(89.8%,n = 221)、在使用抗生素前进行血培养的必要性(87.8%,n = 216)以及测量血乳酸水平(75.6%,n = 186)。经验丰富的医生更有可能将去甲肾上腺素作为首选血管活性药物(p < 0.001)。女性受访者更有可能认为抗生素治疗的持续时间应根据感染部位、微生物病因、患者对治疗的反应以及实现充分源控制的可能性来确定(p = 0.001)。本研究得出结论,受访者态度乐观,经常按照SSC指南进行实践,但一些受访者对最新指南并不了解。需要进一步的干预措施和持续医学教育,以鼓励医生适当使用推荐的指导原则,改善脓毒症患者的治疗效果。