Pugliese Michela, Falcone Annastella, Alibrandi Angela, Zirilli Agata, Passantino Annamaria
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Unit of Statistical and Mathematical Sciences, Department of Economics, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 9;9(10):554. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9100554.
The decision to request and proceed with euthanasia in a dog is complex and predictors of such decisions are important. This study investigates the risk factors (demographic and clinical) associated with the main clinical causes and methods of death (euthanasia or unassisted death) in a population of dogs. By comparing euthanasia to unassisted deaths, the authors assess causes of death to evaluate their relative impacts on decision-making to choose euthanasia compared with an unassisted death. For this, goal data from electronic medical records of dogs who had died (unassisted death and euthanasia), obtained from an Italian referral veterinary teaching hospital from 2010 to 2020, were analyzed. The causes of death were categorized by pathophysiological process and the organ system. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors that significantly affect the probability of undergoing euthanasia and to individuate independent significant predictors of euthanasia and unassisted death, respectively. Death rate by euthanasia was 40.7% (125/307), by died unassisted 50.8% (156/307), whilst only 8.5% of dogs (26/307) died accidentally. The main causes of death for euthanasia were due to neoplastic (75.6%), degenerative (64.3%), and congenital (60%) diseases. Furthermore, the findings reveal that in deaths by euthanasia, the significant risk predictors were female gender, age, and neoplastic and degenerative processes; while in unassisted deaths, the significant risk predictors were male gender, age, and infection/inflammatory conditions. These preliminary outcomes highlight the information of this study which may be used to evaluate strategic interventions and health promotion strategies to be implemented, with consequent welfare gains for the canine population.
决定对犬实施安乐死并继续进行这一行为是复杂的,此类决定的预测因素很重要。本研究调查了犬群中与主要临床死因及死亡方式(安乐死或自然死亡)相关的风险因素(人口统计学和临床因素)。通过将安乐死与自然死亡进行比较,作者评估死因,以评价它们在与自然死亡相比时,对选择安乐死的决策的相对影响。为此,分析了从意大利一家转诊兽医教学医院获取的2010年至2020年期间死亡犬(自然死亡和安乐死)的电子病历中的目标数据。死因按病理生理过程和器官系统进行分类。进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定显著影响接受安乐死概率的因素,并分别确定安乐死和自然死亡的独立显著预测因素。安乐死的死亡率为40.7%(125/307),自然死亡的死亡率为50.8%(156/307),而只有8.5%的犬(26/307)意外死亡。安乐死的主要死因是肿瘤(75.6%)、退行性(64.3%)和先天性(60%)疾病。此外,研究结果显示,在安乐死死亡案例中,显著的风险预测因素是雌性、年龄以及肿瘤和退行性病变过程;而在自然死亡案例中,显著的风险预测因素是雄性、年龄以及感染/炎症情况。这些初步结果突出了本研究的信息,这些信息可用于评估战略干预措施和有待实施的健康促进策略,从而为犬类群体带来福利提升。