Heidt Christoph, Angst Thomas, Büchler Philippe, Hasler Carol-Claudius, Studer Daniel
Department of Orthopedics, University Children's Hospital Basel: Universitats Kinderspital beider Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Department of Orthopedics, University Children's Hospital Basel: Universitats Kinderspital beider Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):921-927. doi: 10.14444/8353. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
The T1-S1 distance to evaluate spinal length is traditionally measured as a straight line on an anteroposterior radiograph. However, this method may not reflect the true 3-dimensional (3D) spinal length. The objective of the study was to evaluate the difference between the traditional T1-S1 measurement and a 3D reconstruction from standard x-ray imaging.
Radiological assessment and 3D reconstruction of spinal length in pediatric patients with various spine deformities. The 3D reconstruction derived from standard biplanar spine x-ray images using a specialized but free available software and calibration device. Direct comparison of length, intraobserver variance for repeated measurements, as well as interobserver correlation for both measurement methods and between different levels of training were evaluated. Furthermore, the influence on spinal length by the degree of spinal deformity as well as other factors was analyzed.
A total of 39 x-ray images from 35 patients at a mean age of 15.4 years (8.9-26.8 years) were evaluated. There was excellent agreement for intra- and interobserver correlation for both measurement techniques. Spinal length assessed using 3D reconstruction was significantly longer compared with the traditional T1-S1 distance, on average 2.7 cm (0.5-6.1 cm). There was also a significant positive correlation between the maximum extent of the deformity and the difference in spinal length.
Traditional T1-S1 distance significantly underestimates the true length of the spine. A 3D measurement reflects the real length of the spine more adequately.
Such information is relevant to the treating spine surgeon when planning or assessing therapeutic measures, especially in advanced deformities.
传统上,用于评估脊柱长度的T1-S1距离是在前后位X线片上以直线方式测量的。然而,这种方法可能无法反映真实的三维(3D)脊柱长度。本研究的目的是评估传统T1-S1测量值与标准X线成像的3D重建之间的差异。
对患有各种脊柱畸形的儿科患者进行脊柱长度的放射学评估和3D重建。3D重建是使用专门但免费的软件和校准设备从标准的双平面脊柱X线图像中得出的。评估了两种测量方法的长度直接比较、重复测量的观察者内差异以及观察者间相关性,以及不同培训水平之间的相关性。此外,分析了脊柱畸形程度以及其他因素对脊柱长度的影响。
共评估了35例患者的39张X线图像,平均年龄为15.4岁(8.9 - 26.8岁)。两种测量技术在观察者内和观察者间相关性方面均具有良好的一致性。与传统的T1-S1距离相比,使用3D重建评估的脊柱长度明显更长,平均长2.7厘米(0.5 - 6.1厘米)。畸形的最大程度与脊柱长度差异之间也存在显著的正相关。
传统的T1-S1距离显著低估了脊柱的真实长度。3D测量能更充分地反映脊柱的实际长度。
这些信息对于脊柱外科医生在规划或评估治疗措施时具有相关性,尤其是在严重畸形的情况下。