• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An Exploratory Study of a Novel Combined Therapeutic Modality for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.一种针对强迫症的新型联合治疗方式的探索性研究。
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 28;12(10):1309. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101309.
2
Comparison of Disease Severity, Anxiety and Depression in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patients with Different Insight.不同自知力的强迫症患者的疾病严重程度、焦虑和抑郁的比较。
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2024 Feb;52(1):10-18.
3
Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.接纳与承诺疗法及重复经颅磁刺激对强迫症的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 12;12:720518. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.720518. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessing the Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Obsessive- Compulsive Disorder.评估重复经颅磁刺激治疗强迫症的有效性。
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2022 Nov;53(6):491-498. doi: 10.1177/15500594221076596. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
5
The Suitability of Different Subtypes and Dimensions of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder for Treatment with Anterior Capsulotomy: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study.不同亚型和维度的强迫症采用前扣带束切开术治疗的适用性:一项长期随访研究
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2019;97(5-6):319-336. doi: 10.1159/000500137. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
6
Are Mentalizing Abilities and Insight Related to the Severity of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.心理化能力和洞察力与强迫症的严重程度有关吗?
Psychiatry Investig. 2018 Sep;15(9):843-851. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.05.02.2. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
7
Criterion Validity of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Second Edition for Diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Adults.耶鲁-布朗强迫量表第二版用于成人强迫症诊断的效标效度
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 11;9:431. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00431. eCollection 2018.
8
Efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy with medication for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A multicentre randomised controlled trial in China.认知行为疗法联合药物治疗强迫症患者的疗效:中国多中心随机对照试验。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 15;253:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.090. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
Hoarding symptoms and prediction of poor response to limbic system surgery for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder.囤积症状与边缘系统手术治疗难治性强迫症反应不良的预测。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jul;121(1):123-30. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.JNS131423. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
10
A retrospective review of clinical characteristics and treatment response in body dysmorphic disorder versus obsessive-compulsive disorder.躯体变形障碍与强迫症的临床特征及治疗反应的回顾性研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;62(1):67-72; quiz 73. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0114b.

引用本文的文献

1
Insight in obsessive-compulsive disorder: conception, clinical characteristics, neuroimaging, and treatment.强迫症洞察:概念、临床特征、神经影像学及治疗
Psychoradiology. 2023 Nov 8;3:kkad025. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkad025. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacological and Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Management of Obsessive-compulsive Disorder in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.成人强迫症管理的药物和心理治疗干预:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2021 Oct;19(4):457-467. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.19402. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
2
The effect of treatment on insight in psychotic disorders - A systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗对精神病性障碍自知力的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Jun;244:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2022.05.023. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
3
The Persistence and Change in China's Healthcare Insurance Reform: Clues from Fiscal Subsidy Policies Made for Settling COVID-19 Patients' Medical Costs.中国医疗保险改革的持续性与变化:来自应对新冠患者医疗费用财政补贴政策的线索
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 May 24;15:1129-1144. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S349124. eCollection 2022.
4
Insight Into the Effects of Clinical Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Brain From Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies: A Narrative Review.正电子发射断层扫描和磁共振成像研究对临床重复经颅磁刺激对大脑影响的洞察:一项叙述性综述
Front Neurosci. 2022 Feb 21;16:787403. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.787403. eCollection 2022.
5
Safety and efficacy of early augmentation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of drug-free patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.早期重复经颅磁刺激强化治疗无药物治疗的强迫症患者的安全性和有效性。
CNS Spectr. 2022 Jan 27:1-7. doi: 10.1017/S1092852922000013.
6
The cost of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in China: a multi-center cross-sectional survey based on hospitals.中国强迫症的花费:一项基于医院的多中心横断面调查
Gen Psychiatr. 2021 Dec 6;34(6):e100632. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2021-100632. eCollection 2021.
7
Functional and Structural Connectivity Between the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Insula Could Predict the Antidepressant Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.左侧背外侧前额叶皮层与脑岛之间的功能和结构连接可预测重复经颅磁刺激的抗抑郁效果。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Mar 26;15:645936. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.645936. eCollection 2021.
8
Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis.非侵入性脑刺激对脑疾病认知功能的疗效:荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2020 Nov;50(15):2465-2486. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003670. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
9
Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018).基于证据的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗应用指南:更新(2014-2018)。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
10
Strengthened theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunctive treatment for Alzheimer's disease: An open-label pilot study.强化theta爆发式经颅磁刺激作为阿尔茨海默病的辅助治疗:一项开放标签的试点研究。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Mar-Apr;13(2):484-486. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.12.020. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

一种针对强迫症的新型联合治疗方式的探索性研究。

An Exploratory Study of a Novel Combined Therapeutic Modality for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

作者信息

Huang Yueqi, Yang Hangyi, Zhu Cheng, Jiang Xiaoying, Zhu Wenjing, Liang Yan, Ma Lisha, Wang Yunzan, Tang Wenxin

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Affiliated Mental Health Centre and Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310013, China.

Fourth Clinical School, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310013, China.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 28;12(10):1309. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101309.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci12101309
PMID:36291243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9599080/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether a systematic combined therapeutic modality (CTM) could quickly and effectively improve the severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and the insight of OCD patients.

METHODS

Included in this study were 100 patients with OCD according to the 5th Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), for a 2-week short-term treatment. They were assigned to a drug-alone group ( = 57), and a CTM group ( = 43) using drug treatment in combination with cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The therapeutic outcome was assessed by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale (BABS), 24-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-24) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) before and after treatment. All data were treated with SPSS25.0 Software.

RESULTS

After the 2-week treatment, the success rate in the CTM group was significantly higher than that in the drug-alone group. Y-BOCS overall and factor scores were decreased as compared with those before treatment in both groups. HAMD, HAMA and BABS overall scores were all decreased after treatment in the CTM group. In addition, compared with the drug-alone group, the Y-BOCS overall score and factor score, HAMD overall score and HAMA overall score were all decreased significantly in CTM group, while the Y-BOCS score reduction rate was increased significantly. Insight was improved in eight cases (57.14%) in the CTM group containing 14 cases with poor insight. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that CTM was beneficial for the insight improvement of OCD patients (OR = 91.04-139.68); this improvement was more pronounced in patients with low baseline BABS overall scores (OR = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

CTM may be an effective short-term strategy to improve the severity of OCD and insight of OCD patients and, therefore, is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

摘要

目的

探讨系统联合治疗模式(CTM)能否快速有效地改善强迫症(OCD)的严重程度及OCD患者的自知力。

方法

根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)纳入100例OCD患者进行为期2周的短期治疗。将他们分为单纯药物治疗组(n = 57)和采用药物治疗联合认知行为治疗(CBT)及重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的CTM组(n = 43)。治疗前后采用耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)、布朗信念评估量表(BABS)、24项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-24)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评估治疗效果。所有数据用SPSS25.0软件处理。

结果

2周治疗后,CTM组的有效率显著高于单纯药物治疗组。两组Y-BOCS总分及因子分均较治疗前降低。CTM组治疗后HAMD、HAMA及BABS总分均降低。此外,与单纯药物治疗组相比,CTM组Y-BOCS总分及因子分、HAMD总分及HAMA总分均显著降低,且Y-BOCS评分降低率显著提高。CTM组14例自知力差的患者中有8例(57.14%)自知力得到改善。多项logistic回归分析显示,CTM有利于OCD患者自知力的改善(OR = 91.04 - 139.68);在基线BABS总分较低的患者中这种改善更明显(OR = 0.07)。

结论

CTM可能是改善OCD严重程度及OCD患者自知力的一种有效的短期策略,因此值得临床推广应用。