Horlick M
Soc Secur Bull. 1987 Jul;50(7):15-24.
Only recently have social insurance and private pensions, collectively, come to be thought of in terms of a total social security benefit package. The economic problems brought on by the 1974 oil crisis initially triggered consideration of a common, integrated role for the two systems. The second oil crisis reinforced the relative expansion in private pension programs, as a supplement to social security. Before these events, private and public pension programs interacted in only a limited number of ways, confined to relatively few countries. These interactions were largely confined to collective bargaining, whereby private pensions were gradually extended to nearly all employees in France and Sweden; mandating, or legally requiring private supplementation of social security, debated in several countries in the early 1970's, but postponed by the 1974 oil crisis; and contracting out, or covering a part of the social security benefit under a private plan, as in the United Kingdom. Overall, the tradition of private pensions was not very strong or broadbased. The current debate centers on which public/private pension mix is desirable from the point of view of an old-age income-maintenance program. A new element is the rising support for a "third pillar"--individual tax-encouraged savings--not only as a supplement, but as an alternative to social insurance.
直到最近,社会保险和私人养老金才被一并视为一个完整的社会保障福利体系。1974年石油危机引发的经济问题最初促使人们思考这两种制度共同发挥的综合作用。第二次石油危机强化了私人养老金计划作为社会保障补充的相对扩张。在这些事件发生之前,私人和公共养老金计划的互动方式有限,仅在少数国家存在。这些互动主要局限于集体谈判,通过这种方式,法国和瑞典的私人养老金逐渐覆盖了几乎所有员工;强制要求,即法律规定私人补充社会保障,这在20世纪70年代初的几个国家曾有过讨论,但因1974年的石油危机而推迟;以及外包,即在英国,由私人计划承担部分社会保障福利。总体而言,私人养老金的传统并不十分强大,基础也不广泛。当前的辩论集中在从老年收入维持计划的角度来看,哪种公共/私人养老金组合是可取的。一个新的因素是,越来越多的人支持 “第三支柱”——个人税收激励储蓄——不仅作为补充,而且作为社会保险的替代方案。