Suppr超能文献

腹腔内热化疗与二氧化碳再循环:一种安全技术。

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Recirculation with CO: A Safe Technique.

作者信息

Gómez-Sanz Remedios, Ovejero-Merino Enrique, Lasa-Unzúe Inmaculada, López-García Adela, Marcos-Hernández Ruth, Mínguez-García Javier, García-Moreno Nisa Francisca, Mendoza-Moreno Fernando, Díez-Alonso Manuel, Ortega Miguel A, Álvarez-Mon Melchor, Gutiérrez-Calvo Alberto

机构信息

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Príncipe de Asturias Teaching Hospital, 28805 Madrid, Spain.

Spanish Group of Peritoneal Oncologic Surgery (GECOP), Principe de Asturias Teaching Hospital, University of Alcalá de Henares, 28001 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 19;11(20):6152. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206152.

Abstract

Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) has evolved as a treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis in various tumors after a careful and complete cytoreductive surgery, and it demonstrated much better and longer survival than more traditional therapeutic schemas. Our objective has been to examine the safety, efficacy and survival achieved with closed technique with CO-agitation system Combat PRS (Peritoneal Recirculation System: PRS). To achieve this, we compared the appearance of adverse events, mortality and survival with the described using classic techniques (open, closed without CO-agitation) for the treatment of selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis; Materials and methods: We studied overall survival, disease-free survival and safety (morbidity and mortality) of the administration of HIPEC through a closed method technique with CO recirculation (Combat PRS) in 482 patients from 11 Spanish hospitals; Results: The mortality of our technique (1.66%) was similar to other published techniques (open, closed). Morbidity exhibited a 9.96% rate of Clavien-Dindo (CD) III/IV complications in 482 patients, which was lower than in other series. Survival (overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)) was similar to previously published results: 86% 1y-OS, 54% 3y-OS, 77% 1y-DFS and 31% 3y-DFS; Conclusion: The procedure with closed PRS with CO agitation is as safe as standard open and closed procedures for the administration of HIPEC after complete cytoreductive surgery, with similar and very low mortality (1.66%) and lower morbidity (9.96% CD III and IV in our series vs range of 20-40% in the majority of different series); only Kusamura had similar results, with 12% in 205 patients, using the closed technique without CO agitation).

摘要

热灌注化疗(HIPEC)已发展成为一种在仔细且彻底的肿瘤细胞减灭术后用于治疗各种肿瘤腹膜转移癌的方法,并且与更传统的治疗方案相比,它显示出更好、更长的生存期。我们的目标是研究采用带有CO搅拌系统Combat PRS(腹膜循环系统:PRS)的封闭技术所实现的安全性、有效性和生存期。为实现这一目标,我们将采用经典技术(开放、无CO搅拌的封闭)治疗选定腹膜转移癌患者时不良事件的发生情况、死亡率和生存期进行了比较;材料与方法:我们研究了来自11家西班牙医院的482例患者通过采用CO再循环的封闭方法技术(Combat PRS)进行热灌注化疗给药后的总生存期、无病生存期和安全性(发病率和死亡率);结果:我们技术的死亡率(1.66%)与其他已发表的技术(开放、封闭)相似。482例患者中Clavien-Dindo(CD)III/IV级并发症的发病率为9.96%,低于其他系列。生存期(总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS))与先前发表的结果相似:1年总生存率为86%,3年总生存率为54%,1年无病生存率为77%,3年无病生存率为31%;结论:在完整的肿瘤细胞减灭术后,采用带CO搅拌的封闭PRS进行热灌注化疗给药的操作与标准的开放和封闭操作一样安全,死亡率相似且极低(1.66%),发病率更低(我们系列中CD III和IV级为9.96%,而大多数不同系列的范围为20 - 40%);只有Kusamura使用无CO搅拌的封闭技术在205例患者中得到了相似的结果(12%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc98/9605477/1cc55c30f1d8/jcm-11-06152-g001a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验