Tworzewski Paweł, Alexy Jeffrey K, Barnes Robert W
Department of Strength of Materials, Concrete and Bridge Structures, Kielce University of Technology, aleja Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland.
Brown+Kubican Structural Engineers, 2224 Young Dr, Lexington, KY 40505, USA.
Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 21;15(20):7390. doi: 10.3390/ma15207390.
Many researchers around the world have made extensive efforts to study the phenomenon of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) debonding. Based on these efforts, code provisions and various models have been proposed for predicting intermediate crack (IC) debonding failure. The paper presents a comparison of seven selected models: bulletin 14 approach, Teng et al. model, Lu model, Seracino et al. model, Said and Wu model, Elsanadedy et al. model and ACI 440. The accuracy of each model was evaluated based on the test results of 58 flexural specimens with IC debonding failures of externally bonded (EB), carbon FRP plates or sheets found in the existing literature. The experimental database was prepared to include a wide range of parameters affecting the issue under consideration. A comparison of the measured and predicted load capacity values was made to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the considered models. The analysis included the limitation of the load capacity estimated based on IC debonding models as well as concrete crushing and FRP rupture types of failure. The results indicate that the latest models proposed for direct implementation in design guidelines-the Said and Wu model and the Elsanadedy et al. model-offer the best accuracy in predicting the load capacity. In contrast, the bulletin 14 approach shows a wide dispersion of predictions and a large proportion of highly overestimated results.
世界各地的许多研究人员都付出了巨大努力来研究纤维增强聚合物(FRP)脱粘现象。基于这些努力,已经提出了规范条文和各种模型来预测中间裂缝(IC)脱粘失效。本文对七个选定的模型进行了比较:公告14方法、滕等人的模型、卢模型、塞拉西诺等人的模型、赛义德和吴模型、埃尔萨纳迪迪等人的模型以及美国混凝土学会(ACI)440。根据现有文献中58个外部粘贴(EB)碳FRP板或片材发生IC脱粘失效的受弯试件的试验结果,评估了每个模型的准确性。准备的试验数据库涵盖了影响所考虑问题的广泛参数。通过比较实测和预测的承载能力值来评估所考虑模型的预测准确性。分析包括基于IC脱粘模型估计的承载能力的局限性以及混凝土压碎和FRP断裂等破坏类型。结果表明,为直接应用于设计指南而提出的最新模型——赛义德和吴模型以及埃尔萨纳迪迪等人的模型——在预测承载能力方面具有最佳准确性。相比之下,公告14方法的预测结果分散性很大,且有很大比例的结果被高估。