Bains Karen Eline Stensby, Gudmundsdóttir Hrefna Katrín, Färdig Martin, Amnö Erik, Jonassen Christine M, Nordlund Björn, Rehbinder Eva Maria, Skjerven Håvard O, Rueegg Corina Silvia, Vettukattil Riyas, Lødrup Carlsen Karin C
University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Oct 24;8(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00165-2022. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Tidal flow-volume (TFV) loops are commonly recorded in infants during sleep, due to the more regular breathing patterns compared to the awake state. Standardised deselection of loops outside pre-specified ranges are based on periods of regular breathing, while criteria and available software for visual evaluation of TFV loops are lacking. We aimed to determine the reliability of standardised criteria for manual selection of infant TFV loops.
Using a pre-defined set of criteria, three independent raters manually evaluated TFV loops among 57 randomly selected awake healthy 3-month-old infants with available TFV measurements in the Scandinavian Preventing Atopic Dermatitis and ALLergies in children (PreventADALL) study. The TFV loops were sampled using the Eco Medics Exhalyzer D. Criteria for selecting TFV loops included reproducible shape and volume with only one peak in tidal expiratory flow (PTEF), excluding loops with no clear or uneven flow towards PTEF. By intraclass coefficient (ICC), the reliability of agreement between raters was determined for the time to PTEF ( ) to expiratory time ( ) and other TFV loop parameters.
Five infants had unsuccessful tests. Among the remaining 52 infants, the raters selected a median of 25, 26 and 15 loops per test. The ICCs (95% CI) were 0.97 (0.92-0.98) for / , 0.99 (0.99-1.00) for respiratory rate, 0.98 (0.97-0.99) for tidal volume per kg and 0.98 (0.97-0.99) for expiratory volume, reflecting excellent agreement in all categories.
Manual TFV loop selection using standardised criteria provides a reliable alternative for lung function measures in awake infants with interrupted breathing cycles in a real-life setting.
由于与清醒状态相比,婴儿睡眠时呼吸模式更规律,因此常记录其潮气量-流速(TFV)环。基于规律呼吸时段对预先指定范围之外的环进行标准化筛选,而目前缺乏用于TFV环视觉评估的标准和可用软件。我们旨在确定手动选择婴儿TFV环的标准化标准的可靠性。
在斯堪的纳维亚儿童预防特应性皮炎和过敏(PreventADALL)研究中,使用一组预先定义的标准,三名独立评估者对57名随机选择的、清醒健康的3个月大婴儿(有可用的TFV测量值)的TFV环进行了手动评估。TFV环使用Eco Medics Exhalyzer D进行采样。选择TFV环的标准包括可重复的形状和体积,潮气量呼气流量(PTEF)只有一个峰值,不包括向PTEF方向无明显或不均匀气流的环。通过组内相关系数(ICC),确定评估者之间在达到PTEF的时间( )与呼气时间( )以及其他TFV环参数方面的一致性可靠性。
五名婴儿测试未成功。在其余52名婴儿中,评估者每次测试选择的环数中位数分别为25、26和15个。 / 的ICC(95%CI)为0.97(0.92 - 0.98),呼吸频率的ICC为0.99(0.99 - 1.00),每千克潮气量的ICC为0.98(0.97 - 0.99),呼气量的ICC为0.98((0.97 - 0.99),表明在所有类别中一致性都非常好。
在现实生活中,对于呼吸周期中断的清醒婴儿,使用标准化标准手动选择TFV环为肺功能测量提供了一种可靠的替代方法。