• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物模拟西罗莫司洗脱支架血运重建后伴或不伴糖尿病患者的血管造影和临床结局。

Angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus after revascularization with BioMime sirolimus-eluting stent.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Carollo Hospital, Suncheon, South Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2022 Dec 1;33(8):643-647. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001188. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000001188
PMID:36302183
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Drug-eluting stents (DES) significantly improved angiographic and clinical outcomes compared with bare-metal stents in patients with diabetes. The clinical effects of BioMime sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in patients with diabetes have not been evaluated. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of BioMime DES in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with versus without diabetes.

METHODS

This prospective analytical study compared angiographic in-segment late loss and clinical effectiveness of BioMime SES stents in treating patients with (patients: 77 and lesions: 83) versus without (patients: 154 and lesions: 162) diabetes. The purpose of this study was the comparison of angiographic in-segment late loss at 12 months. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were also monitored as secondary outcomes 24 months after the index procedure.

RESULTS

Of 231 patients enrolled in the study, the mean age was 63.3 years and 153 patients were male. Angiographic follow-up rate was 84.8% (patients: 196) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up rate was 67.9% (patients: 157) at 12 months. Diabetic patients were comparable to nondiabetic patients for 12-month in-segment late loss (0.01 ± 0.31 mm for the nondiabetes group versus 0.04 ± 0.11 mm for the diabetes group; P = 0.158; P < 0.05). At 24 months, MACEs, including death, myocardial infarction and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization were not statistically different between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

BioMime SES stents in treating patients with diabetes were comparable in reducing angiographic restenosis at 12 months and MACEs at 24 months compared to nondiabetic patients with CAD.

摘要

简介

与金属裸支架相比,药物洗脱支架(DES)可显著改善糖尿病患者的血管造影和临床结局。尚未评估 BioMime 西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)在糖尿病患者中的临床效果。因此,我们比较了 BioMime DES 在伴或不伴糖尿病的冠心病(CAD)患者中的疗效。

方法

本前瞻性分析性研究比较了 BioMime SES 支架治疗伴(患者:77 例,病变:83 例)和不伴(患者:154 例,病变:162 例)糖尿病的 CAD 患者的血管造影节段内晚期丢失和临床疗效。本研究的目的是比较 12 个月时的血管造影节段内晚期丢失。主要不良心脏事件(MACEs)也作为次要结局在指数操作后 24 个月进行监测。

结果

在纳入研究的 231 例患者中,平均年龄为 63.3 岁,153 例患者为男性。血管造影随访率为 84.8%(患者:196 例),血管内超声(IVUS)随访率为 67.9%(患者:157 例),随访时间为 12 个月。12 个月时,糖尿病患者的节段内晚期丢失与非糖尿病患者相当(非糖尿病组为 0.01±0.31mm,糖尿病组为 0.04±0.11mm;P=0.158;P<0.05)。24 个月时,两组间的 MACEs,包括死亡、心肌梗死和缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建,无统计学差异。

结论

与非糖尿病 CAD 患者相比,BioMime SES 支架治疗糖尿病患者在 12 个月时降低血管造影再狭窄和 24 个月时降低 MACEs 的效果相当。

相似文献

1
Angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus after revascularization with BioMime sirolimus-eluting stent.生物模拟西罗莫司洗脱支架血运重建后伴或不伴糖尿病患者的血管造影和临床结局。
Coron Artery Dis. 2022 Dec 1;33(8):643-647. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001188. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stent versus sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus (ESSENCE-DIABETES): results from the ESSENCE-DIABETES trial.随机比较依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗糖尿病患者新发冠状动脉疾病(ESSENCE-DIABETES):来自 ESSENCE-DIABETES 试验的结果。
Circulation. 2011 Aug 23;124(8):886-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015453. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
3
A 10-month angiographic and 4-year clinical outcome of everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in patients with diabetes mellitus (the DiabeDES IV randomized angiography trial).糖尿病患者中依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架与西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的10个月血管造影和4年临床结果(DiabeDES IV随机血管造影试验)
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 1;86(7):1161-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25875. Epub 2015 May 6.
4
Late-term clinical outcomes with zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents. 5-year follow-up of the ENDEAVOR III (A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).晚期临床结果与佐他莫司和西罗莫司洗脱支架。ENDEAVOR III 试验(美敦力 Endeavor 药物 [ABT-578]洗脱冠状动脉支架系统与 Cypher 西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统在初发原生冠状动脉病变中的随机对照试验)的 5 年随访结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May;4(5):543-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.014.
5
Second-versus first-generation "Limus"-eluting stents in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized comparison in setting of ISAR-TEST-4 trial.第二代与第一代“利莫斯”洗脱支架用于冠心病糖尿病患者:ISAR-TEST-4试验背景下的随机对照比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov 15;82(6):E769-76. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24741. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
6
Comparison of resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with de novo long coronary artery lesions: a randomized LONG-DES IV trial.比较新型的佐他莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架在治疗初发长段冠状动脉病变患者中的疗效:一项随机 LONG-DES IV 试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(5):633-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965673. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
7
Randomized trial of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of coronary restenosis in sirolimus-eluting stents: the ISAR-DESIRE 2 (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug Eluting Stents for In-Stent Restenosis 2) study.紫杉醇洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗西罗莫司洗脱支架内再狭窄的随机试验:ISAR-DESIRE 2(冠状动脉支架置入术和血管造影结果:药物洗脱支架治疗支架内再狭窄 2)研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 15;55(24):2710-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
8
A prospective multicenter parallel-controlled trial of TIVOLI biodegradable-polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent compared to ENDEAVOR zotarolimus-eluting stent for the treatment of coronary artery disease: 8-month angiographic and 2-year clinical follow-up results.前瞻性多中心平行对照试验:TIVOLI 可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与 ENDEAVOR 佐他莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的比较:8 个月血管造影和 2 年临床随访结果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Mar;124(6):811-6.
9
Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial.雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架植入病变大隐静脉桥血管的随机双盲比较:RRISC 试验的六个月血管造影、血管内超声及临床随访
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Dec 19;48(12):2423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.021. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
10
Impact of angiographic and intravascular ultrasound features on clinical outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de-novo lesions in nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic patients.血管造影和血管内超声特征对非糖尿病和2型糖尿病患者初发病变西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术后临床结局的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2010 May;21(3):175-81. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32833811fe.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective Cohort Study: Nomogram for 1-Year in-Stent Restenosis After PCI in Coronary Heart Disease.回顾性队列研究:冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后1年支架内再狭窄的列线图
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Aug 11;18:2627-2637. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S533714. eCollection 2025.