Suppr超能文献

病例报告:由于刺突 69/70 缺失下游的单点突变,使用变异特异性 PCR 检测显示出 BA.2 样模式的 BA.1 亚变体。

Case report: BA.1 subvariant showing a BA.2-like pattern using a variant-specific PCR assay due to a single point mutation downstream the spike 69/70 deletion.

机构信息

Universidade de Vigo. Microbiology and Infectology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Vigo, Spain.

Microbiology and Infectology Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur). Microbiology Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo (CHUVI), SERGAS, Vigo, Spain.

出版信息

Virol J. 2022 Oct 27;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01883-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 variant tracking is key to the genomic surveillance of the COVID-19 pandemic. While next-generation sequencing (NGS) is commonly used for variant determination, it is expensive and time-consuming. Variant-specific PCR (vsPCR) is a faster, cheaper method that detects specific mutations that are considered variant-defining. These tests usually rely on specific amplification when a mutation is present or a specific melting temperature peak after amplification.

CASE PRESENTATION

A discrepant result between vsPCR and NGS was found in seventeen SARS-CoV-2 samples from Galicia, Spain. A cluster of BA.1 Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant showed a BA.2-like melting temperature pattern due to a point mutation (C21772T) downstream the deletion of the spike amino acids 69/70. As the 69/70 deletion is widely used for differentiation between BA.1 and BA.2 by vsPCR, C21772T can cause BA.1 samples to be misinterpreted as BA.2. Over a thousand BA.1 sequences in the EpiCoV database contain this mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first case of a point mutation causing a vsPCR algorithm to misclassify BA.1 samples as BA.2. This is an example of how mutations in the probe target area of vsPCR tests based on melting curve analysis can lead to variant misclassification. NGS confirmation of vsPCR results is relevant for the accuracy of the epidemiological surveillance. In order to overcome the possible impact of novel mutations, diagnostic tools must be constantly updated.

摘要

背景

SARS-CoV-2 变体跟踪是 COVID-19 大流行基因组监测的关键。虽然下一代测序(NGS)常用于变体确定,但它昂贵且耗时。变体特异性 PCR(vsPCR)是一种更快、更便宜的方法,可检测被认为是变体定义的特定突变。这些测试通常依赖于存在突变时的特定扩增或扩增后的特定熔解温度峰。

病例介绍

在来自西班牙加利西亚的 17 个 SARS-CoV-2 样本中发现了 vsPCR 和 NGS 之间的不一致结果。由于尖峰氨基酸 69/70 缺失下游的点突变(C21772T),一组 BA.1 奥密克戎 SARS-CoV-2 变体显示出 BA.2 样的熔解温度模式。由于 69/70 缺失广泛用于通过 vsPCR 区分 BA.1 和 BA.2,因此 C21772T 可导致 BA.1 样本被错误解释为 BA.2。EpiCoV 数据库中的一千多个 BA.1 序列包含此突变。

结论

据我们所知,这是第一个由于点突变导致 vsPCR 算法错误地将 BA.1 样本分类为 BA.2 的病例。这是一个例子,说明了基于熔解曲线分析的 vsPCR 测试中探针靶区的突变如何导致变体分类错误。对 vsPCR 结果进行 NGS 确认对于流行病学监测的准确性很重要。为了克服新突变的可能影响,诊断工具必须不断更新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8523/9615367/0ce8b6a15aca/12985_2022_1883_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验