• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

军事样本中记忆抱怨量表与PAI认知偏差量表的比较

Comparison of the Memory Complaints Inventory and the PAI Cognitive Bias Scale in a Military Sample.

作者信息

Armistead-Jehle Patrick, Ingram Paul B

机构信息

Munson Army Health Center, Fort Leavenworth, Leavenworth, KS, USA.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb 18;38(2):270-275. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac079.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acac079
PMID:36303522
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Memory Complaints Inventory (MCI) is a stand-alone memory-based symptom validity test (SVT). The measure is promising and has been used with relative frequency, but requires additional research (Armistead-Jehle & Shura, 2022). The current study sought to expand the empirical base of the MCI by comparing it to the Cognitive Bias Scale, a new symptom validity measure assessing cognitive over reporting on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI).

METHOD

Retrospective review of 273 military service members seen for neuropsychological evaluation and administered both the PAI and MCI.

RESULTS

Area under the curve values for the MCI overall mean score and MCI implausible scales for a PAI Cognitive Bias Scale (CBS) cut score of >14 were large in effect (0.77 and 0.78, respectively). The effect size between those that passed and failed the CBS on the mean of MCI scales was also large (d = 1.13). Classification statistics indicated that a cut score of 52% on the mean MCI scales and 29% on the mean MCI implausible subscales indicated specificities of 0.94 and 0.93 and sensitivities of 0.30 and 0.29, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the MCI as a cognitive SVT relative to the PAI CBS. We offer guidance on how to integrate these SVT measures in military samples.

摘要

目的

记忆投诉量表(MCI)是一种独立的基于记忆的症状效度测试(SVT)。该测量方法很有前景且已得到相对频繁的使用,但仍需要更多研究(阿米斯特德 - 杰勒和舒拉,2022年)。本研究旨在通过将MCI与认知偏差量表进行比较来扩大其经验基础,认知偏差量表是一种新的症状效度测量方法,用于评估在人格评估问卷(PAI)上认知过度报告的情况。

方法

对273名接受神经心理学评估并同时接受PAI和MCI测试的军人进行回顾性研究。

结果

对于PAI认知偏差量表(CBS)得分>14的情况,MCI总体平均得分和MCI不可信量表的曲线下面积值效应较大(分别为0.77和0.78)。在MCI量表平均值上,通过和未通过CBS的人之间的效应量也很大(d = 1.13)。分类统计表明,MCI量表平均值的52%和MCI不可信子量表平均值的29%的临界值分别表明特异性为0.94和0.93,敏感性为0.30和0.29。

结论

这些数据支持MCI作为相对于PAI CBS的认知SVT。我们提供了关于如何在军事样本中整合这些SVT测量方法的指导。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Memory Complaints Inventory and the PAI Cognitive Bias Scale in a Military Sample.军事样本中记忆抱怨量表与PAI认知偏差量表的比较
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb 18;38(2):270-275. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac079.
2
Clinical utility of the memory complaints inventory to detect invalid test performance.记忆主诉量表检测无效测试表现的临床效用。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 May;30(4):610-28. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1177597. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
3
Replication and cross-validation of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) cognitive bias scale (CBS) in a mixed clinical sample.在混合临床样本中复制和交叉验证人格评估量表(PAI)认知偏差量表(CBS)。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1860-1877. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1889681. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
4
Validation of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) cognitive bias (CBS) and cognitive bias scale of scales (CB-SOS) in a post-deployment veteran sample.验证人格评估量表 (PAI) 认知偏差 (CBS) 和认知偏差量表 (CB-SOS) 在部署后退伍军人样本中的应用。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Oct;37(7):1548-1565. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2022.2131630. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
5
Cross validation of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Cognitive Bias Scale of Scales (CB-SOS) over-reporting indicators in a military sample.在军事样本中对人格评估量表(PAI)认知偏差量表(CB-SOS)的虚报指标进行交叉验证。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Mar-Apr;36(2):192-202. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2160151. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
6
Scores on the MMPI-2-RF scales as a function of increasing levels of failure on cognitive symptom validity tests in a military sample.明尼苏达多相人格测验第二版修订本(MMPI-2-RF)量表分数与军事样本中认知症状效度测验失败程度呈正相关。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(5):790-815. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.693202. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
7
Personality Assessment Inventory Cognitive Bias Scale: Validation in a Military Sample.人格评估量表认知偏差量表:在军事样本中的验证
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Oct 8;35(7):1154–1161. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa049. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
8
The construction and the initial validation of the Cognitive Bias Scale for the Personality Assessment Inventory.人格评估量表认知偏差量表的构建与初步验证。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Nov;33(8):1467-1484. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1612947. Epub 2019 May 16.
9
Clinical utility of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory validity scales to screen for symptom exaggeration following traumatic brain injury.神经行为症状量表效度量表在筛查创伤性脑损伤后症状夸大方面的临床效用。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(8):853-62. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1064864. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Memory complaints inventory and symptom validity test performance in a clinical sample.在临床样本中,记忆抱怨清单和症状有效性测试表现。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Nov;27(7):725-34. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs071. Epub 2012 Aug 10.