Suppr超能文献

在混合临床样本中复制和交叉验证人格评估量表(PAI)认知偏差量表(CBS)。

Replication and cross-validation of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) cognitive bias scale (CBS) in a mixed clinical sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA.

New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1860-1877. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1889681. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

Abstract

This study is a cross-validation of the Cognitive Bias Scale (CBS) from the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a ten-item scale designed to assess symptom endorsement associated with performance validity test failure in neuropsychological samples. The study utilized a mixed neuropsychological sample of consecutively referred patients at a large academic medical center in the Midwest. Participants were 332 patients who completed embedded and free-standing performance validity tests (PVTs) and the PAI. Pass and fail groups were created based on PVT performance to evaluate classification accuracy of the CBS. The results were generally consistent with the initial study for overall classification accuracy, sensitivity, and cut-off score. Consistent with the validation study, CBS had better classification accuracy than the original PAI validity scales and a comparable effect size to that obtained in the original validation publication; however, the Somatic Complaints scale (SOM) and the Conversion subscale (SOM-C) also demonstrated good classification accuracy. The CBS had incremental predictive ability compared to existing PAI scales. The results supported the CBS, but further research is needed on specific populations. Findings from this present study also suggest the relationship between conversion tendencies and PVT failure may be stronger in some geographic locations or population types (forensic versus clinical patients).

摘要

本研究对人格评估量表(PAI)中的认知偏差量表(CBS)进行了交叉验证,该量表由十个项目组成,旨在评估神经心理样本中与绩效有效性测试失败相关的症状。该研究采用了中西部地区一家大型学术医疗中心连续转介患者的混合神经心理样本。参与者为 332 名完成嵌入式和独立式绩效有效性测试(PVT)和 PAI 的患者。根据 PVT 表现创建通过和失败组,以评估 CBS 的分类准确性。结果与总体分类准确性、敏感性和截断分数的初始研究基本一致。与验证研究一致,CBS 的分类准确性优于原始 PAI 有效性量表,且与原始验证出版物中的效果大小相当;然而,躯体主诉量表(SOM)和转换子量表(SOM-C)也表现出良好的分类准确性。CBS 与现有 PAI 量表相比具有增量预测能力。结果支持 CBS,但需要对特定人群进行进一步研究。本研究的结果还表明,转换倾向与 PVT 失败之间的关系在某些地理位置或人群类型(法医与临床患者)中可能更强。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验