• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在混合临床样本中复制和交叉验证人格评估量表(PAI)认知偏差量表(CBS)。

Replication and cross-validation of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) cognitive bias scale (CBS) in a mixed clinical sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA.

New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, USA.

出版信息

Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1860-1877. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1889681. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1080/13854046.2021.1889681
PMID:33612093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8454137/
Abstract

This study is a cross-validation of the Cognitive Bias Scale (CBS) from the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a ten-item scale designed to assess symptom endorsement associated with performance validity test failure in neuropsychological samples. The study utilized a mixed neuropsychological sample of consecutively referred patients at a large academic medical center in the Midwest. Participants were 332 patients who completed embedded and free-standing performance validity tests (PVTs) and the PAI. Pass and fail groups were created based on PVT performance to evaluate classification accuracy of the CBS. The results were generally consistent with the initial study for overall classification accuracy, sensitivity, and cut-off score. Consistent with the validation study, CBS had better classification accuracy than the original PAI validity scales and a comparable effect size to that obtained in the original validation publication; however, the Somatic Complaints scale (SOM) and the Conversion subscale (SOM-C) also demonstrated good classification accuracy. The CBS had incremental predictive ability compared to existing PAI scales. The results supported the CBS, but further research is needed on specific populations. Findings from this present study also suggest the relationship between conversion tendencies and PVT failure may be stronger in some geographic locations or population types (forensic versus clinical patients).

摘要

本研究对人格评估量表(PAI)中的认知偏差量表(CBS)进行了交叉验证,该量表由十个项目组成,旨在评估神经心理样本中与绩效有效性测试失败相关的症状。该研究采用了中西部地区一家大型学术医疗中心连续转介患者的混合神经心理样本。参与者为 332 名完成嵌入式和独立式绩效有效性测试(PVT)和 PAI 的患者。根据 PVT 表现创建通过和失败组,以评估 CBS 的分类准确性。结果与总体分类准确性、敏感性和截断分数的初始研究基本一致。与验证研究一致,CBS 的分类准确性优于原始 PAI 有效性量表,且与原始验证出版物中的效果大小相当;然而,躯体主诉量表(SOM)和转换子量表(SOM-C)也表现出良好的分类准确性。CBS 与现有 PAI 量表相比具有增量预测能力。结果支持 CBS,但需要对特定人群进行进一步研究。本研究的结果还表明,转换倾向与 PVT 失败之间的关系在某些地理位置或人群类型(法医与临床患者)中可能更强。

相似文献

1
Replication and cross-validation of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) cognitive bias scale (CBS) in a mixed clinical sample.在混合临床样本中复制和交叉验证人格评估量表(PAI)认知偏差量表(CBS)。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1860-1877. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1889681. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
2
Validation of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) scale of scales in a mixed clinical sample.验证人格评估量表(PAI)在混合临床样本中的量表。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Oct;36(7):1844-1859. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1900400. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
3
The construction and the initial validation of the Cognitive Bias Scale for the Personality Assessment Inventory.人格评估量表认知偏差量表的构建与初步验证。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Nov;33(8):1467-1484. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1612947. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Validation of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) cognitive bias (CBS) and cognitive bias scale of scales (CB-SOS) in a post-deployment veteran sample.验证人格评估量表 (PAI) 认知偏差 (CBS) 和认知偏差量表 (CB-SOS) 在部署后退伍军人样本中的应用。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Oct;37(7):1548-1565. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2022.2131630. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
5
Cross validation of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Cognitive Bias Scale of Scales (CB-SOS) over-reporting indicators in a military sample.在军事样本中对人格评估量表(PAI)认知偏差量表(CB-SOS)的虚报指标进行交叉验证。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Mar-Apr;36(2):192-202. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2160151. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
6
Exploring the sensitivity of the Personality Assessment Inventory symptom validity tests in detecting response bias in a mixed neuropsychological outpatient sample.探索人格评估量表症状效度测试在检测混合神经心理学门诊样本中反应偏差方面的敏感性。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Jul;31(5):844-856. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1312700. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
7
A comparison of the MMPI-2-RF and PAI overreporting indicators in a civil forensic sample with emphasis on the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and the Cognitive Bias Scale (CBS).在民事法医样本中比较 MMPI-2-RF 和 PAI 的虚报指标,重点关注反应偏差量表(RBS)和认知偏差量表(CBS)。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Jan;33(1):71-83. doi: 10.1037/pas0000968. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
Personality Assessment Inventory Cognitive Bias Scale: Validation in a Military Sample.人格评估量表认知偏差量表:在军事样本中的验证
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Oct 8;35(7):1154–1161. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa049. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
9
Stratified performance on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) is associated with differential responding on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI).在记忆错觉测试(TOMM)中的分层表现与人格评估量表(PAI)中的不同反应有关。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Mar;42(2):131-141. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1695749. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
10
Comparison of the Memory Complaints Inventory and the PAI Cognitive Bias Scale in a Military Sample.军事样本中记忆抱怨量表与PAI认知偏差量表的比较
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb 18;38(2):270-275. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac079.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship of Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) over-reporting scales to performance validity testing in a military neuropsychological sample.军事神经心理学样本中人格评估量表(PAI)过度报告量表与效绩效度测试的关系
Mil Psychol. 2022 Mar 29;34(4):484-493. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.2013059. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of the MMPI-2-RF and PAI overreporting indicators in a civil forensic sample with emphasis on the Response Bias Scale (RBS) and the Cognitive Bias Scale (CBS).在民事法医样本中比较 MMPI-2-RF 和 PAI 的虚报指标,重点关注反应偏差量表(RBS)和认知偏差量表(CBS)。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Jan;33(1):71-83. doi: 10.1037/pas0000968. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering  in adults: Two decades of deception detection.成人记忆伪装测验的系统评价和荟萃分析:二十年来的欺骗检测。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Jan;34(1):88-119. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1637027. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
3
The construction and the initial validation of the Cognitive Bias Scale for the Personality Assessment Inventory.人格评估量表认知偏差量表的构建与初步验证。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Nov;33(8):1467-1484. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2019.1612947. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Cross-validation of the Dot Counting Test in a large sample of credible and non-credible patients referred for neuropsychological testing.在为神经心理测试而转介的大量可信和不可信患者中,对点数计数测试进行交叉验证。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Aug;32(6):1054-1067. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1425481. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
5
Form vs Function, fighting the last war: a reflection on the exchange between Larrabee, Bianchini, Boone, and Rohling (2017) and Nichols (2017) over Nichols and Gass (2015). The Fake Bad Scale (FBS): malingering or ligation response syndrome - Which is it?形式与功能,打一场过去的战争:对拉雷比、比安基尼、布恩和罗林(2017 年)与尼科尔斯(2017 年)就尼科尔斯和加斯(2015 年)一文展开的辩论的反思。虚假不佳量表(FBS):装病或捆绑反应综合征——到底是哪一种?
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Nov;31(8):1406-1411. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1365933. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
6
Examination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) in a large sample of credible and noncredible patients referred for neuropsychological testing.对大量接受神经心理测试的可信和不可信患者进行修改后的躯体感觉问卷(MSPQ)检查。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2018 Jan;32(1):165-182. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1330421. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
7
Exploring the sensitivity of the Personality Assessment Inventory symptom validity tests in detecting response bias in a mixed neuropsychological outpatient sample.探索人格评估量表症状效度测试在检测混合神经心理学门诊样本中反应偏差方面的敏感性。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2017 Jul;31(5):844-856. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2017.1312700. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
The multiple validities of neuropsychological assessment.神经心理学评估的多重效度。
Am Psychol. 2015 Nov;70(8):779-788. doi: 10.1037/a0039835.
9
[Formula: see text]Neuropsychologists' Validity Testing Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Professionals.[公式:见正文]神经心理学家的效度测试信念与实践:北美专业人士调查。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(6):741-76. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
10
Evaluation of the MMPI-2-RF for Detecting Over-reported Symptoms in a Civil Forensic and Disability Setting.在民事法医和残疾环境中评估明尼苏达多项人格调查表第二版修订版(MMPI-2-RF)对过度报告症状的检测能力。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(2):255-71. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1033020. Epub 2015 Apr 23.