Cui Li-Yan, Cheng Wen-Wen, Shan Sha-Rui, Lv Wen, Sun Chen-Ming, Li Run, Zhou Shu, Chen Zhuo-Ming, Bao Sheng-Yong
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Oct 11;16:898526. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.898526. eCollection 2022.
Chinese nouns lack inflection and cannot reflect the quantitative relationship between singular and plural numbers. However, neural processes of picture naming are different from those of words. We assume that Chinese single and plural picture naming is different, and they may involve quantitative processing. Therefore, Experiment 1 was designed by picking picture naming as the task and Chinese as the target language and compared the accuracy, reaction time, and event-related potentials (ERPs) between single and plural picture naming, where two types of pictures were mixed. Although the -test showed no significant differences in behavioral data, there were differences in ERPs. ERP differences involved two effects: P1 of 160-180 ms and P2 of 220-260 ms in the parietal-occipital lobe. These differences are suggested to reflect the neural differences in quantitative processing. Therefore, Chinese singular and plural picture naming consists of word production and implicit quantitative processing simultaneously. To explore the relationship between the two processings, we added a semantic factor (inanimate vs. animate items) to the quantity factor of Experiment 1 and carried out Experiment 2, with the observation indexes unchanged. There were no significant differences in behavioral data among the four conditions. After variance analysis, ERPs results indicated an interaction between semantic and quantitative factors in the central area at 180-280 ms. In summary, we suggest that Chinese singular and plural picture naming includes two simultaneous neural processing tasks: word production and quantitative processing, which interact in the central area at 180-280 ms.
中文名词没有词形变化,无法体现单复数之间的数量关系。然而,图片命名的神经过程与词语不同。我们假设中文单复数图片命名存在差异,且可能涉及数量加工。因此,实验1以图片命名为任务、中文为目标语言进行设计,比较了单复数图片命名(两种类型图片混合)之间的准确性、反应时间和事件相关电位(ERP)。虽然t检验显示行为数据无显著差异,但ERP存在差异。ERP差异涉及两种效应:顶枕叶160 - 180毫秒的P1和220 - 260毫秒的P2。这些差异被认为反映了数量加工中的神经差异。因此,中文单复数图片命名同时包含词语生成和隐性数量加工。为探究这两种加工之间的关系,我们在实验1的数量因素基础上增加了一个语义因素(无生命与有生命物品),进行了实验2,观察指标不变。四个条件下的行为数据无显著差异。方差分析后,ERP结果表明在180 - 280毫秒时中央区域语义和数量因素存在交互作用。总之,我们认为中文单复数图片命名包括两个同时进行的神经加工任务:词语生成和数量加工,它们在180 - 280毫秒的中央区域相互作用。