Law Sam-Po, Kong Anthony Pak-Hin, Lai Loretta Wing-Shan, Lai Christy
Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Aphasiology. 2015 Jan;29(1):81-100. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.951598.
Differences in processing nouns and verbs have been investigated intensely in psycholinguistics and neuropsychology in past decades. However, the majority of studies examining retrieval of these word classes have involved tasks of single word stimuli or responses. While the results have provided rich information for addressing issues about grammatical class distinctions, it is unclear whether they have adequate ecological validity for understanding lexical retrieval in connected speech which characterizes daily verbal communication. Previous investigations comparing retrieval of nouns and verbs in single word production and connected speech have reported either discrepant performance between the two contexts with presence of word class dissociation in picture naming but absence in connected speech, or null effects of word class. In addition, word finding difficulties have been found to be less severe in connected speech than picture naming. However, these studies have failed to match target stimuli of the two word classes and between tasks on psycholinguistic variables known to affect performance in response latency and/or accuracy.
The present study compared lexical retrieval of nouns and verbs in picture naming and connected speech from picture description, procedural description, and story-telling among 19 Chinese speakers with anomic aphasia and their age, gender, and education matched healthy controls, to understand the influence of grammatical class on word production across speech contexts when target items were balanced for confounding variables between word classes and tasks.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: Elicitation of responses followed the protocol of the AphasiaBank consortium (http://talkbank.org/AphasiaBank/). Target words for confrontation naming were based on well-established naming tests, while those for narrative were drawn from a large database of normal speakers. Selected nouns and verbs in the two contexts were matched for age-of-acquisition (AoA) and familiarity. Influence of imageability was removed through statistical control.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: When AoA and familiarity were balanced, nouns were retrieved better than verbs, and performance was higher in picture naming than connected speech. When imageability was further controlled for, only the effect of task remained significant.
The absence of word class effects when confounding variables are controlled for is similar to many previous reports; however, the pattern of better word retrieval in naming is rare but compatible with the account that processing demands are higher in narrative than naming. The overall findings have strongly suggested the importance of including connected speech tasks in any language assessment and evaluation of language rehabilitation of individuals with aphasia.
在过去几十年里,心理语言学和神经心理学对名词和动词加工的差异进行了深入研究。然而,大多数考察这些词类提取的研究都涉及单个单词刺激或反应的任务。虽然这些结果为解决语法类别区分问题提供了丰富信息,但尚不清楚它们对于理解日常言语交流中连贯言语的词汇提取是否具有足够的生态效度。以往比较名词和动词在单个单词产出和连贯言语中提取情况的研究报告称,要么在两种情境下表现存在差异,即图片命名中存在词类分离而连贯言语中不存在,要么词类没有影响。此外,人们发现找词困难在连贯言语中比在图片命名中不那么严重。然而,这些研究未能在两个词类的目标刺激以及已知会影响反应潜伏期和/或准确性表现的心理语言学变量的任务之间进行匹配。
本研究比较了19名患有命名性失语症的汉语使用者及其年龄、性别和教育程度相匹配的健康对照者在图片命名以及来自图片描述、程序描述和讲故事的连贯言语中名词和动词的词汇提取情况,以了解当目标项目在词类和任务之间的混杂变量上达到平衡时,语法类别对跨言语情境的单词产出的影响。
当AoA和熟悉度达到平衡时,名词的提取优于动词,且图片命名中的表现高于连贯言语。当进一步控制可想象性时,只有任务效应仍然显著。
在控制混杂变量时词类效应的缺失与许多先前的报告相似;然而,命名中单词提取更好的模式很少见,但与叙述中的加工需求高于命名的观点一致。总体研究结果强烈表明,在任何语言评估以及对失语症患者的语言康复评估中纳入连贯言语任务的重要性。