Suppr超能文献

一种基于胆汁样本的多病原体PCR检测方法可指导胆汁淤积性肝病的经验性抗菌策略。

A Multipathogen Bile Sample-based PCR Assay Can Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Strategies in Cholestatic Liver Diseases.

作者信息

Jahn Michael, Özçürümez Mustafa K, Dolff Sebastian, Rohn Hana, Heider Dominik, Dechêne Alexander, Canbay Ali, Rath Peter M, Katsounas Antonios

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Department of Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2022 Oct 28;10(5):788-795. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00337. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques provide rapid detection of pathogens. This pilot study evaluated the diagnostic utility and clinical impact of multiplex real-time PCR (mRT-PCR, Septi) vs. conventional microbial culture (CMC) in bile samples of patients with chronic cholestatic liver diseases (cCLDs), endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), and peri-interventional-antimicrobial-prophylaxis (pAP).

METHODS

We prospectively collected bile samples from 26 patients for microbiological analysis by CMC and mRT-PCR. Concordance of the results of both methods was determined by Krippendorff's alpha (α) for inter-rater reliability and the Jaccard index of similarity.

RESULTS

mRT-PCR and CMC results were concordant for only (α=0.8406; Jaccard index=0.8181). mRT-PCR detected pathogens in 8/8 cases (100%), CMC in 7/8 (87.5%), and CMC in 5/8 (62.5%) with clinical signs of infection. mRT-PCR, CMC, and CMC had identical detection results in 3/8 (37.5%) with clinical signs of infection (two spp. and one ). The total pathogen count was significantly higher with mRT-PCR than with CMC (62 vs. 31; χ=30.031, <0.001). However, pathogens detected by mRT-PCR were more often susceptible to pAP according to the patient infection/colonization history (PI/CH) and surveillance data for antibiotic resistance in our clinic (DARC). Pathogens identified by mRT-PCR and resistant to pAP by PI/CH and DARC were likely to be clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

mRT-PCR in conjunction with CMCs for bile analysis increased diagnostic sensitivity and may benefit infection management in patients with cholestatic diseases. Implementation of mRT-PCR in a bile sample-based diagnostic routine can support more rapid and targeted use of antimicrobial agents in cCLD-patients undergoing ERCP and reduce the rate/length of unnecessary administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

摘要

背景与目的

聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术可快速检测病原体。本前瞻性研究评估了多重实时PCR(mRT-PCR,Septi)与传统微生物培养(CMC)在慢性胆汁淤积性肝病(cCLD)患者胆汁样本、内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)及围手术期抗菌预防(pAP)中的诊断效用及临床影响。

方法

我们前瞻性收集了26例患者的胆汁样本,采用CMC和mRT-PCR进行微生物分析。两种方法结果的一致性通过Krippendorff's α(α)评估评分者间信度,以及Jaccard相似性指数来确定。

结果

mRT-PCR和CMC结果仅在……时一致(α=0.8406;Jaccard指数=0.8181)。mRT-PCR在8/8例(100%)中检测到病原体,CMC在8/8例中的7例(87.5%)中检测到病原体,CMC在有感染临床体征的8/8例中的5例(62.5%)中检测到病原体。mRT-PCR、CMC和CMC在有感染临床体征的8/8例中的3例(37.5%)中检测结果相同(两种……菌属和一种……菌属)。mRT-PCR检测到的病原体总数显著高于CMC(62对31;χ=30.031,<0.001)。然而,根据患者感染/定植史(PI/CH)和我们诊所的抗生素耐药监测数据(DARC),mRT-PCR检测到的病原体对pAP更敏感。mRT-PCR鉴定出且根据PI/CH和DARC对pAP耐药的病原体可能具有临床相关性。

结论

mRT-PCR联合CMC进行胆汁分析可提高诊断敏感性,可能有益于胆汁淤积性疾病患者的感染管理。在基于胆汁样本的诊断常规中实施mRT-PCR可支持对接受ERCP的cCLD患者更快速、有针对性地使用抗菌药物,并降低广谱抗生素不必要使用的频率/时长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/150e/9547272/ed40a9571232/JCTH-10-0788-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验