Chandra Subhash, Klair Jagpal Singh, Soota Kaartik, Livorsi Daniel J, Johlin Frederick C
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa,
Dig Dis. 2019;37(2):155-160. doi: 10.1159/000493579. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
Only a small proportion of patients with biliary tree infection grow microorganisms in blood cultures. Antibiotics chosen or tailored based on organisms identified on blood cultures have a potential for under-treatment and unfavorable outcomes, including recurrent infection and early stent occlusion. In our current practice, we collect bile for culture if an Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP) is performed in patients with suspected cholangitis. In this study, we compare the microbial yield of blood cultures and ERCP-obtained bile cultures in patients with ascending cholangitis.
We reviewed medical records of all the patients treated for ascending cholangitis who had blood cultures and ERCP-obtained bile cultures at a tertiary care center between 2010 and 2016. Bile was collected for culture before injecting contrast, via a catheter after discarding the initial 3 mL.
Ninety-three patients were included with mean age of 71 (±15) years. Out of 93 patients, 11 (12%) had prior sphincterotomy, 29 (31%) had an indwelling biliary stent, and malignant obstruction was the most common etiology (34%). ERCP-obtained bile cultures were positive in 90 out of 93 (97%) patients with monomicrobial growth in 34 out of 93 (39%) patients. Mixed intestinal flora was noted in 3 patients. Blood cultures were positive in only 30 out of 93 patients (32%) and 24 out of 93 (26%) patients had monomicrobial growth. Totally 26 out of 30 patients (87%) grew the same organism as the bile culture, 3 grew an organism different from bile cultures, and one had no growth in the bile culture. On multivariable analysis, the presence of an indwelling biliary stent was the lone factor associated with polymicrobial growth, 83 vs. 52%, p = 0.007.
ERCP-obtained bile cultures are a reliable and feasible mechanism to evaluate patients with suspected biliary tree infection. This technique has a significantly higher yield when compared to blood culture. Selection and tailoring of antibiotics based on bile culture in the management of ascending cholangitis are advised.
在胆道感染患者中,仅有一小部分患者血培养可培养出微生物。根据血培养中鉴定出的微生物选择或调整的抗生素有治疗不足及导致不良结局的风险,包括反复感染和早期支架闭塞。在我们目前的临床实践中,对于疑似胆管炎的患者,如果进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP),我们会采集胆汁进行培养。在本研究中,我们比较了急性胆管炎患者血培养和ERCP获取的胆汁培养的微生物检出率。
我们回顾了2010年至2016年期间在一家三级医疗中心接受急性胆管炎治疗且进行了血培养和ERCP获取胆汁培养的所有患者的病历。在注入造影剂前,通过导管弃去最初3 mL胆汁后收集胆汁进行培养。
纳入93例患者,平均年龄71(±15)岁。在93例患者中,11例(12%)曾行括约肌切开术,29例(31%)有留置胆管支架,恶性梗阻是最常见的病因(34%)。93例患者中有90例(97%)ERCP获取的胆汁培养阳性,93例患者中有34例(39%)为单一微生物生长。3例患者发现混合肠道菌群。93例患者中仅有30例(32%)血培养阳性,93例患者中有24例(26%)为单一微生物生长。30例血培养阳性患者中有26例(87%)培养出与胆汁培养相同的微生物,3例培养出与胆汁培养不同的微生物,1例胆汁培养无生长。多变量分析显示,留置胆管支架是与多微生物生长相关的唯一因素,比例分别为83%和52%,p = 0.007。
ERCP获取的胆汁培养是评估疑似胆道感染患者的可靠且可行的方法。与血培养相比,该技术的检出率显著更高。建议在急性胆管炎的治疗中根据胆汁培养选择和调整抗生素。