Schaefer C F, Biber B, Brackett D J, Schmidt C C, Fagraeus L, Wilson M F
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1987 Aug;31(6):550-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1987.tb02619.x.
A standardized rat endotoxin shock model was used to assess the differential effects of four commonly used anesthetics upon hemodynamics before and during endotoxin shock. Forty-nine male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 307 +/- 4 g were divided into five groups:freely-moving conscious, enflurane (2%), isoflurane (1.4%), pentobarbital (6 mg.kg-1.h-1 i.v.), and ketamine (45 mg.kg-1.h-1 i.v.). Anesthetic doses were chosen as 1.0 MAC equivalent. Anesthetized rats were intubated and ventilated with oxygen. The right carotid artery was cannulated with a thermocouple-catheter for aortic blood pressure, heart rate, and thermodilution cardiac output measurements. The right jugular vein was cannulated for measurement of central venous pressure and for i.v. injections. Data were collected over a 30-min baseline period and for 4 h after an i.v. bolus of endotoxin (40 mg.kg-1, LD100 within 24 h). Gross small intestinal pathology was rated on a 0-4 scale. Anesthetic effects were judged in terms of significant deviations from the awake data on each parameter. Despite differing patterns, total deviations were similar for enflurane, ketamine, and pentobarbital, although the latter drug was the least preferable due to particularly high systemic vascular resistance. Significantly less hemorrhagic small intestinal pathology occurred with enflurane. Ketamine offered no advantage over the inhalation anesthetics. Among the four anesthetics tested, results were closest to the awake pattern with isoflurane anesthesia, thus making it the logical choice for hemodynamic studies in experimental shock research.
采用标准化的大鼠内毒素休克模型,评估四种常用麻醉剂在内毒素休克前及休克期间对血流动力学的不同影响。49只体重为307±4g的雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠被分为五组:自由活动清醒组、安氟醚(2%)组、异氟醚(1.4%)组、戊巴比妥(6mg·kg-1·h-1静脉注射)组和氯胺酮(45mg·kg-1·h-1静脉注射)组。麻醉剂量选择为1.0MAC当量。麻醉后的大鼠进行气管插管并给予氧气通气。用热电偶导管插入右颈动脉,用于测量主动脉血压、心率和热稀释法心输出量。插入右颈静脉用于测量中心静脉压和静脉注射。在30分钟的基线期以及静脉注射内毒素(40mg·kg-1,24小时内的LD100)后4小时收集数据。小肠大体病理学按0-4级评分。根据每个参数与清醒数据的显著偏差来判断麻醉效果。尽管模式不同,但安氟醚、氯胺酮和戊巴比妥的总偏差相似,不过由于后者的全身血管阻力特别高,是最不理想的药物。安氟醚导致的出血性小肠病理学改变明显较少。氯胺酮与吸入性麻醉剂相比没有优势。在所测试的四种麻醉剂中,异氟醚麻醉的结果最接近清醒模式,因此使其成为实验性休克研究中血流动力学研究的合理选择。