• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本消费包装产品的生命周期环境影响。

Life cycle environmental impacts of consumer packaging products in Japan.

作者信息

Pragati Pooja, Maeda Yasunobu

机构信息

Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Management of Business Development, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, Japan.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2023 Aug;43(8):1682-1693. doi: 10.1111/risa.14031. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1111/risa.14031
PMID:36307375
Abstract

Several Japanese companies and the government are recently promoting a plastic ban and imposing a tax levy to curb litter and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This has led to a rapid rise of nonplastic packaging alternatives. While plastics and litter are pressing concerns, it is paramount to examine environmental risks of other alternatives before wide application and legislative action, to not further the risk of environmental damage. This study aims to quantify and compare plastic products such as polyethylene-terephthalate (PET) bottles and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bags with widely available alternatives in Japan like glass bottles, aluminum bottles, paper bags, and textile bags, to find a product with the least environmental impact. A life cycle assessment is conducted from a cradle-to-grave environmental impact approach that includes raw material extraction, production, transportation, end-of-life treatment, and disposal. Sixteen impact categories including climate change, acidification, aquatic-toxicity, so forth, and weighing is assessed using the MiLCA software. The functional unit is one piece of each packaging product, and impacts of product-filling, storage, recycling, and reuse are excluded for a consistent comparison. HDPE bags performed better than paper and textile bags in 15 of the 16 analyzed impact categories. Similarly, PET bottles outperformed aluminum and glass bottles in 12 out of the 16 impact categories analyzed. Weighted results also highlight the heightened negative environmental impacts of replacing plastic packaging with widely available alternatives.

摘要

几家日本公司和政府最近正在推动塑料禁令并征收税款,以遏制垃圾并减少温室气体排放。这导致了非塑料包装替代品的迅速兴起。虽然塑料和垃圾是紧迫问题,但在广泛应用和立法行动之前,检查其他替代品的环境风险以避免进一步造成环境破坏风险至关重要。本研究旨在对聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(PET)瓶和高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)袋等塑料制品与日本广泛使用的替代品(如玻璃瓶、铝瓶、纸袋和纺织袋)进行量化和比较,以找到对环境影响最小的产品。从摇篮到坟墓的环境影响方法进行生命周期评估,包括原材料提取、生产、运输、生命周期结束处理和处置。使用MiLCA软件评估包括气候变化、酸化、水生毒性等在内的16个影响类别,并进行加权。功能单元是每个包装产品的一件,为了进行一致的比较,排除了产品填充、储存、回收和再利用的影响。在分析的16个影响类别中的15个类别中,HDPE袋的表现优于纸袋和纺织袋。同样,在分析的16个影响类别中的12个类别中,PET瓶的表现优于铝瓶和玻璃瓶。加权结果还凸显了用广泛使用的替代品取代塑料包装会加剧负面环境影响。

相似文献

1
Life cycle environmental impacts of consumer packaging products in Japan.日本消费包装产品的生命周期环境影响。
Risk Anal. 2023 Aug;43(8):1682-1693. doi: 10.1111/risa.14031. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Replacing Plastics with Alternatives Is Worse for Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Most Cases.在大多数情况下,用替代品替代塑料会导致温室气体排放增加。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Feb 13;58(6):2716-2727. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c05191. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
3
Plastic (PET) vs bioplastic (PLA) or refillable aluminium bottles - What is the most sustainable choice for drinking water? A life-cycle (LCA) analysis.塑料(PET)与生物塑料(PLA)或可重复灌装的铝瓶——饮用水的最可持续选择是什么?生命周期(LCA)分析。
Environ Res. 2021 May;196:110974. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110974. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
4
Jute and kenaf carrier bags: an eco-friendly alternative to plastic bags in India.黄麻和红麻购物袋:印度塑料袋的环保替代品。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(22):61904-61912. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26436-0. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
5
Recycling potential of post-consumer plastic packaging waste in Finland.芬兰消费后塑料包装废物的回收潜力。
Waste Manag. 2018 Jan;71:52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.033. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
Life cycle assessment of pharmaceutical packaging addressing end-of-life alternatives.药品包装生命周期评估,着眼于生命周期终结时的各种替代方案。
Waste Manag. 2024 Mar 1;175:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.12.022. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
7
Comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of four disposal scenarios for used polyethylene terephthalate bottles in Mauritius.毛里求斯四种废弃聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯瓶处理方案的生命周期评价和生命周期成本比较。
Environ Technol. 2012 Sep;33(16-18):2007-18. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2012.655321.
8
Environmental life cycle assessment of nutraceuticals: A case study on methylcobalamin in different packaging types.营养保健品的环境生命周期评估:以不同包装类型的甲钴胺为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Oct 1;893:164780. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164780. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
9
Environmental taxation of plastic bags and substitutes: Balancing marine pollution and climate change.塑料袋和替代品的环境税:平衡海洋污染和气候变化。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;359:120868. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120868. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
10
The Cradle-to-Cradle Life Cycle Assessment of Polyethylene terephthalate: Environmental Perspective.聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯的从摇篮到摇篮生命周期评估:环境视角。
Molecules. 2022 Feb 28;27(5):1599. doi: 10.3390/molecules27051599.

引用本文的文献

1
How does plastic compare with alternative materials in the packaging sector? A systematic review of LCA studies.在包装领域,塑料与其他替代材料相比如何?生命周期评估研究的系统综述。
Waste Manag Res. 2025 Mar;43(3):339-357. doi: 10.1177/0734242X241241606. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Prospects for Recyclable Multilayer Packaging: A Case Study.可回收多层包装的前景:一个案例研究
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;15(13):2966. doi: 10.3390/polym15132966.