Department of Anesthesiologia and Reanimation, Malatya Education and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Malatya Turgut Üniversty Malatya, Turkey.
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;25(10):1710-1716. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_190_22.
Studies on the evaluation of the Perfusion Index (PI) and the Pleth Variability Index (PVI) and the success of PI and PVI block in patients undergoing brachial plexus are limited and quite inadequate.
In our study, we aimed to compare PI and PVI between the interscalen block and infraclavicular block and evaluate its use as an early marker in block success.
Single-center prospective randomized controlled trials. Preoperative unit, operating room. Patients over 18 years of age who have had upper extremity surgery. Brachial plexus block (interscalene, infraclavicular). Demographic data, Hemodynamic parameters, Perfusion index and Pleth Variability Index. 40 patients, including ASA1-2, 20 patients over the age of 18, who were planned for upper extremity surgery, in the interscalen group, and 20 in the supraclavicular group, were included in the study. Demographic data of the patients were recorded by measuring PI and PVI values at baseline before the block and at the 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after the block, both simultaneously.
62.5% (n = 25) of the patients included in the study were female. The mean age of the patients was detected as 52.63 ± 16.472, the mean BMI as 26.57 ± 4.423, and the mean entry hemoglobin level as 13.71 ± 1.87 g/dL. The hemodynamic data of the groups were similar across the time periods. The increase in PI increased significantly after 1 minute in both groups. The PVI was similar between the groups at all measurement times.
In our study, we observed an increase in PI from the 1 minute compared to the non-blocked arm in successful block applications. We consider the early indicator of PI in the evaluation of block success. In our study, we did not observe a significant change in the arm that was blocked and the arm that was not treated with PVI.
关于经皮氧分压(PI)和容积脉搏变异指数(PVI)评估以及在臂丛神经阻滞中 PI 和 PVI 阻滞成功的研究有限且远远不够。
在我们的研究中,我们旨在比较经斜角肌间隙阻滞和锁骨下入路阻滞之间的 PI 和 PVI,并评估其作为阻滞成功的早期标志物的作用。
单中心前瞻性随机对照试验。术前单位、手术室。年龄在 18 岁以上且接受过上肢手术的患者。臂丛神经阻滞(经斜角肌间隙、锁骨下入路)。人口统计学数据、血流动力学参数、灌注指数和容积脉搏变异指数。40 名患者,包括 ASA1-2 级,年龄超过 18 岁,计划接受上肢手术,其中 20 名在经斜角肌间隙组,20 名在锁骨下入路组,纳入研究。记录患者的人口统计学数据,在阻滞前、阻滞后 1、5、10、15 和 20 分钟时同时测量 PI 和 PVI 值。
研究纳入的 62.5%(n=25)患者为女性。患者的平均年龄为 52.63±16.472 岁,平均 BMI 为 26.57±4.423,平均入组血红蛋白水平为 13.71±1.87g/dL。组间各时间段的血流动力学数据相似。两组的 PI 在 1 分钟后均显著增加。在所有测量时间,两组的 PVI 均相似。
在我们的研究中,我们观察到在成功阻滞应用中,与非阻滞臂相比,PI 从第 1 分钟开始增加。我们认为 PI 是评估阻滞成功的早期指标。在我们的研究中,我们没有观察到阻滞臂和未治疗臂的 PVI 有显著变化。