• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么我们不能从环境中预测性状?

Why can't we predict traits from the environment?

作者信息

Anderegg Leander D L

机构信息

Department of Ecology, Evolution & Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93117, USA.

出版信息

New Phytol. 2023 Mar;237(6):1998-2004. doi: 10.1111/nph.18586. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1111/nph.18586
PMID:36308517
Abstract

Plant functional traits are powerful ecological tools, but the relationships between plant traits and climate (or environmental variables more broadly) are often remarkably weak. This presents a paradox: Plant traits govern plant interactions with their environment, but the environment does not strongly predict the traits of plants living there. Unpacking this paradox requires differentiating the mechanisms of trait variation and potential confounds of trait-environment relationships at different evolutionary and ecological scales ranging from within species to among communities. It also necessitates a more integrated understanding of physiological and evolutionary equifinality among many traits and plant strategies, and challenges us to understand how supposedly 'functional' traits integrate into a whole-organism phenotype in ways that may be largely orthogonal to environmental tolerances.

摘要

植物功能性状是强大的生态学工具,但植物性状与气候(或更广泛意义上的环境变量)之间的关系往往非常微弱。这就产生了一个悖论:植物性状支配着植物与环境的相互作用,但环境并不能有力地预测生长在那里的植物的性状。解开这个悖论需要区分性状变异的机制以及在从物种内部到群落之间的不同进化和生态尺度上性状与环境关系的潜在混杂因素。这也需要对许多性状和植物策略之间的生理和进化等效性有更综合的理解,并促使我们去理解所谓的“功能”性状是如何以可能在很大程度上与环境耐受性正交的方式整合到整个生物体表型中的。

相似文献

1
Why can't we predict traits from the environment?为什么我们不能从环境中预测性状?
New Phytol. 2023 Mar;237(6):1998-2004. doi: 10.1111/nph.18586. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
Abundance-weighted plant functional trait variation differs between terrestrial and wetland habitats along wide climatic gradients.丰度加权的植物功能性状变化在沿宽气候梯度的陆地和湿地生境之间存在差异。
Sci China Life Sci. 2021 Apr;64(4):593-605. doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1766-1. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
3
Within-species patterns challenge our understanding of the leaf economics spectrum.种内模式挑战了我们对叶片经济谱的理解。
Ecol Lett. 2018 May;21(5):734-744. doi: 10.1111/ele.12945. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
4
Impacts of climate timescale on the stability of trait-environment relationships.气候时间尺度对性状-环境关系稳定性的影响。
New Phytol. 2024 Mar;241(6):2423-2434. doi: 10.1111/nph.19416. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
5
Can evolutionary history predict plant plastic responses to climate change?进化历史能否预测植物对气候变化的弹性反应?
New Phytol. 2022 Aug;235(3):1260-1271. doi: 10.1111/nph.18194. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
Evolution of the leaf economics spectrum in herbs: Evidence from environmental divergences in leaf physiology across Helianthus (Asteraceae).草本植物叶片经济谱的演化:来自向日葵属(菊科)叶片生理环境差异的证据
Evolution. 2015 Oct;69(10):2705-20. doi: 10.1111/evo.12768. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
7
Intraspecific trait variation influences physiological performance and fitness in the South Africa shrub genus Protea (Proteaceae).种内性状变异影响南非山龙眼属(山龙眼科)植物的生理表现和适应性。
Ann Bot. 2021 Mar 24;127(4):519-531. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa060.
8
Leaf traits and performance vary with plant age and water availability in Artemisia californica.在加利福尼亚蒿属植物中,叶片特征和性能随植物年龄和水分可利用性而变化。
Ann Bot. 2021 Mar 24;127(4):495-503. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa106.
9
Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and environmental trade-offs between leaf productivity and persistence.叶片生产力与持久性之间的分类学、系统发育学和环境权衡
Ecology. 2009 Oct;90(10):2779-91. doi: 10.1890/08-1126.1.
10
Decoupled leaf and root carbon economics is a key component in the ecological diversity and evolutionary divergence of deciduous and evergreen lineages of genus .叶片与根系碳经济的解耦是该属落叶和常绿谱系生态多样性与进化分化的关键组成部分。
Am J Bot. 2017 Jun;104(6):803-816. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700051. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Intra-Specific Variation and Correlation of Functional Traits in at Different Stand Ages.不同林龄下[具体树种未给出]功能性状的种内变异与相关性
Plants (Basel). 2025 Aug 27;14(17):2675. doi: 10.3390/plants14172675.
2
Foliar spectral signatures reveal adaptive divergence in live oaks (Quercus section Virentes) across species and environmental niches.叶片光谱特征揭示了活橡树(栎属绿栎组)在物种和环境生态位间的适应性分化。
New Phytol. 2025 Oct;248(1):370-388. doi: 10.1111/nph.70424.
3
Rapid Climate Acclimation (Not Traits or Phylogeny) Drives Variation in Photosynthesis Temperature Response.
快速气候适应(而非性状或系统发育)驱动光合作用温度响应的变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Sep;31(9):e70474. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70474.
4
Ecological and hydroclimatic determinants of vegetation water-use strategies.植被水分利用策略的生态和水文气候决定因素。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02810-8.
5
Regulatory Coordination of Photophysical, Photochemical, and Biochemical Reactions in the Photosynthesis of Land Plants.陆地植物光合作用中光物理、光化学和生物化学反应的调控协调
Plant Direct. 2025 May 26;9(5):e70080. doi: 10.1002/pld3.70080. eCollection 2025 May.
6
All the light we cannot see: Climate manipulations leave short and long-term imprints in spectral reflectance of trees.我们看不见的所有光:气候操纵在树木的光谱反射率中留下短期和长期印记。
Ecology. 2025 May;106(5):e70048. doi: 10.1002/ecy.70048.
7
Strong scale-dependent relationships between fine-root function and soil properties uncovered with spatially coupled sampling.通过空间耦合采样发现细根功能与土壤性质之间存在强烈的尺度依赖关系。
New Phytol. 2025 Jun;246(6):2506-2521. doi: 10.1111/nph.70143. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
8
Cumulative Ecological Impact of Cascade Hydropower Development on Fish Community Structure in the Main Stream of the Xijiang River, China.梯级水电开发对中国西江干流鱼类群落结构的累积生态影响
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 10;15(4):495. doi: 10.3390/ani15040495.
9
Aboveground and belowground trait coordination across twelve boreal forest tree species.12种北方森林树种地上与地下性状的协调性
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):680. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84162-0.
10
Does optimality partitioning theory fail for belowground traits? Insights from geophysical imaging of a drought-release experiment in a Scots Pine forest.最优分配理论在地下性状方面是否失效?来自苏格兰松树林干旱解除实验地球物理成像的见解。
New Phytol. 2025 Jan;245(2):546-558. doi: 10.1111/nph.20245. Epub 2024 Nov 18.