Suppr超能文献

左心房计时在双腔起搏器程控中的重要性。

Importance of left atrial timing in the programming of dual-chamber pacemakers.

作者信息

Wish M, Fletcher R D, Gottdiener J S, Cohen A I

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1987 Sep 1;60(7):566-71. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90306-7.

Abstract

To determine the hemodynamic effect of different programmed atrioventricular (AV) delays and the importance of the actual timing of left atrial (LA) depolarization, 16 patients with dual-chamber pacemakers were studied and all were found to have an optimal programmed AV delay for cardiac function. However, randomly chosen AV delays of 150, 200 or 250 ms actually provided worse stroke volume than VVI pacing in 7 patients. The optimal programmed AV delay was variable between patients and was related to the interatrial conduction delay, measured as the time from right atrial pacing artifact to LA depolarization (mean 144 +/- 82 ms, range 70 to 380.) Patients with short interatrial delays (less than or equal to 90 ms) were served better by shorter programmed AV delays (150 ms), and patients with longer interatrial delays (greater than or equal to 120 ms) were served better by longer programmed AV delays (greater than or equal to 200 ms) (p less than 0.05). Furthermore, as pacing mode changed from dual-chamber sequential pacing (DVI) to atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (VDD), the LA to ventricular sequence increased from 6 +/- 81 ms to 137 +/- 50 ms (p less than 0.001). This change in the LA to ventricular sequence with mode change produced a significant decrease in stroke volume (p less than 0.05). Thus, the optimal programmed AV delay in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers is predicted by the relation of LA and ventricular activation. Because interatrial conduction delays vary widely, optimal programming requires knowledge of the LA to ventricular sequence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为了确定不同程控房室(AV)延迟的血流动力学效应以及左心房(LA)去极化实际时间的重要性,对16例双腔起搏器患者进行了研究,发现所有患者均有一个对心功能而言的最佳程控AV延迟。然而,在7例患者中,随机选择的150、200或250毫秒的AV延迟实际上比VVI起搏时的心搏量更差。最佳程控AV延迟在患者之间各不相同,且与房间传导延迟有关,房间传导延迟以从右心房起搏伪差到LA去极化的时间来衡量(平均144±82毫秒,范围70至380毫秒)。房间延迟短(小于或等于90毫秒)的患者采用较短的程控AV延迟(150毫秒)效果更好,而房间延迟长(大于或等于120毫秒)的患者采用较长的程控AV延迟(大于或等于200毫秒)效果更好(p<0.05)。此外,当起搏模式从双腔顺序起搏(DVI)变为心房同步心室起搏(VDD)时,LA至心室的顺序从6±81毫秒增加到137±50毫秒(p<0.001)。随着模式改变,LA至心室顺序的这种变化导致心搏量显著下降(p<0.05)。因此,双腔起搏器患者的最佳程控AV延迟可通过LA与心室激活的关系来预测。由于房间传导延迟差异很大,最佳程控需要了解LA至心室的顺序。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验